@_RaulFerrer

Uso de las TIC y herramientas 2.0 en

Fisioterapia y ENFERMERÍA

#TICsFTPyENF

ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE

FISIOTERAPIA EN ATENCIÓN PRIMARIA

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

35%2.638 millones de personas

conectadas en 2014

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

35%2.638 millones de personas

conectadas en 2014

S9%

30% nativos digitales

“la población de jóvenes conectados de 15 a 24 años de edad, con cinco o más años de experiencia en línea”

Unión internacional de Telecomunicaciones (UIT). Naciones Unidas

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

V Estudio Anual de Redes Sociales de IAB Spain Enero 2014

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

SV Estudio Anual de Redes Sociales de IAB Spain Enero 2014

76,2%de las Personas en España

entre 16 y 74 añosUsan internet

+26mill

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFV Estudio Anual de Redes Sociales de IAB Spain Enero 2014

Usan redes sociales a diario

Los ciudadanos ante la e-sanidad. Instituto ONTSI. Julio de 2012

48,3%Internautas buscaron

sobre SALUD

#TICsFTPyENF

“Una Revolución no se produce cuando la sociedad adopta nuevas herramientas, ocurre cuando la sociedad adopta nuevos comportamientos”

Clay Shirky

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFHesse B, Moser R, Rutten L. Surveys of Physicians and Electronic HealthInformation. NEJM 2010 Mar 4;362(9):859-60

Lo primero que se consulta es internet.

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFGráfico original de Los ciudadanos ante la e-sanidad. Instituto ONTSI. Julio de 2012

Tipos de INFORMACIÓN que buscan los pacientes

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJ Med Internet Res 2014 vol. 16 issue. 8

Original Paper

Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: ContentAnalysis and Evaluation of User Engagement

Timothy M Hale1, PhD; Akhilesh S Pathipati2, BA; Shiyi Zan1, BS; Kamal Jethwani1, MD, MPH1Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare, Inc, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States

Corresponding Author:Timothy M Hale, PhDCenter for Connected HealthPartners HealthCare, IncHarvard Medical School25 New Chardon Street, Suite 300Boston, MA, 02114United StatesPhone: 1 617 643 9852Fax: 1 617 726 7530Email: tmhale@mgh.harvard.edu

AbstractBackground: A sizable majority of adult Internet users report looking for health information online. Social networking sites(SNS) like Facebook represent a common place to seek information, but very little is known about the representation and use ofhealth content on SNS.Objective: Our goal in this study was to understand the role of SNS in health information seeking. More specifically, we aimedto describe how health conditions are represented on Facebook Pages and how users interact with these different conditions.Methods: We used Google Insights to identify the 20 most searched for health conditions on Google and then searched eachof the resulting terms on Facebook. We compiled a list of the first 50 Facebook “Pages” results for each health condition. Afterfiltering results to identify pages relevant to our research, we categorized pages into one of seven categories based on the page’sprimary purpose. We then measured user engagement by evaluating the number of “Likes” for different conditions and types ofpages.Results: The search returned 50 pages for 18 of the health conditions, but only 48 pages were found for “anemia” and 5 pageswere found for “flu symptoms”, yielding a total of 953 pages. A large number of pages (29.4%, 280/953) were irrelevant to thehealth condition searched. Of the 673 relevant pages, 151 were not in English or originated outside the United States, leaving522 pages to be coded for content. The most common type of page was marketing/promotion (32.2%, 168/522) followed byinformation/awareness (20.7%, 108/522), Wikipedia-type pages (15.5%, 81/522), patient support (9.4%, 49/522), and generalsupport (3.6%, 19/522). Health conditions varied greatly by the primary page type. All health conditions had somemarketing/promotion pages and this made up 76% (29/38) of pages on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The largestpercentage of general support pages were cancer (19%, 6/32) and stomach (16%, 4/25). For patient support, stroke (67%, 4/6),lupus (33%, 10/30), breast cancer (19%, 6/31), arthritis (16%, 6/36), and diabetes (16%, 6/37) ranked the highest. Six healthconditions were not represented by any type of support pages (ie, human papillomavirus, diarrhea, flu symptoms, pneumonia,spine, human immunodeficiency virus). Marketing/promotion pages accounted for 46.73% (10,371,169/22,191,633) of all Likes,followed by support pages (40.66%, 9,023,234/22,191,633). Cancer and breast cancer accounted for 86.90%(19,284,066/22,191,633) of all page Likes.Conclusions: This research represents the first attempts to comprehensively describe publicly available health content and userengagement with health conditions on Facebook pages. Public health interventions using Facebook will need to be designed toensure relevant information is easy to find and with an understanding that stigma associated with some health conditions maylimit the users’ engagement with Facebook pages. This line of research merits further investigation as Facebook and other SNScontinue to evolve over the coming years.

(J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182) doi:10.2196/jmir.3275

J Med Internet Res 2014 | vol. 16 | iss. 8 | e182 | p.1http://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e182/(page number not for citation purposes)

Hale et alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH

XSL•FORenderX

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJ Med Internet Res 2014 vol. 16 issue. 8

Original Paper

Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: ContentAnalysis and Evaluation of User Engagement

Timothy M Hale1, PhD; Akhilesh S Pathipati2, BA; Shiyi Zan1, BS; Kamal Jethwani1, MD, MPH1Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare, Inc, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States

Corresponding Author:Timothy M Hale, PhDCenter for Connected HealthPartners HealthCare, IncHarvard Medical School25 New Chardon Street, Suite 300Boston, MA, 02114United StatesPhone: 1 617 643 9852Fax: 1 617 726 7530Email: tmhale@mgh.harvard.edu

AbstractBackground: A sizable majority of adult Internet users report looking for health information online. Social networking sites(SNS) like Facebook represent a common place to seek information, but very little is known about the representation and use ofhealth content on SNS.Objective: Our goal in this study was to understand the role of SNS in health information seeking. More specifically, we aimedto describe how health conditions are represented on Facebook Pages and how users interact with these different conditions.Methods: We used Google Insights to identify the 20 most searched for health conditions on Google and then searched eachof the resulting terms on Facebook. We compiled a list of the first 50 Facebook “Pages” results for each health condition. Afterfiltering results to identify pages relevant to our research, we categorized pages into one of seven categories based on the page’sprimary purpose. We then measured user engagement by evaluating the number of “Likes” for different conditions and types ofpages.Results: The search returned 50 pages for 18 of the health conditions, but only 48 pages were found for “anemia” and 5 pageswere found for “flu symptoms”, yielding a total of 953 pages. A large number of pages (29.4%, 280/953) were irrelevant to thehealth condition searched. Of the 673 relevant pages, 151 were not in English or originated outside the United States, leaving522 pages to be coded for content. The most common type of page was marketing/promotion (32.2%, 168/522) followed byinformation/awareness (20.7%, 108/522), Wikipedia-type pages (15.5%, 81/522), patient support (9.4%, 49/522), and generalsupport (3.6%, 19/522). Health conditions varied greatly by the primary page type. All health conditions had somemarketing/promotion pages and this made up 76% (29/38) of pages on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The largestpercentage of general support pages were cancer (19%, 6/32) and stomach (16%, 4/25). For patient support, stroke (67%, 4/6),lupus (33%, 10/30), breast cancer (19%, 6/31), arthritis (16%, 6/36), and diabetes (16%, 6/37) ranked the highest. Six healthconditions were not represented by any type of support pages (ie, human papillomavirus, diarrhea, flu symptoms, pneumonia,spine, human immunodeficiency virus). Marketing/promotion pages accounted for 46.73% (10,371,169/22,191,633) of all Likes,followed by support pages (40.66%, 9,023,234/22,191,633). Cancer and breast cancer accounted for 86.90%(19,284,066/22,191,633) of all page Likes.Conclusions: This research represents the first attempts to comprehensively describe publicly available health content and userengagement with health conditions on Facebook pages. Public health interventions using Facebook will need to be designed toensure relevant information is easy to find and with an understanding that stigma associated with some health conditions maylimit the users’ engagement with Facebook pages. This line of research merits further investigation as Facebook and other SNScontinue to evolve over the coming years.

(J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182) doi:10.2196/jmir.3275

J Med Internet Res 2014 | vol. 16 | iss. 8 | e182 | p.1http://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e182/(page number not for citation purposes)

Hale et alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH

XSL•FORenderX

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJ Med Internet Res 2014 vol. 16 issue. 8

Original Paper

Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: ContentAnalysis and Evaluation of User Engagement

Timothy M Hale1, PhD; Akhilesh S Pathipati2, BA; Shiyi Zan1, BS; Kamal Jethwani1, MD, MPH1Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare, Inc, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States

Corresponding Author:Timothy M Hale, PhDCenter for Connected HealthPartners HealthCare, IncHarvard Medical School25 New Chardon Street, Suite 300Boston, MA, 02114United StatesPhone: 1 617 643 9852Fax: 1 617 726 7530Email: tmhale@mgh.harvard.edu

AbstractBackground: A sizable majority of adult Internet users report looking for health information online. Social networking sites(SNS) like Facebook represent a common place to seek information, but very little is known about the representation and use ofhealth content on SNS.Objective: Our goal in this study was to understand the role of SNS in health information seeking. More specifically, we aimedto describe how health conditions are represented on Facebook Pages and how users interact with these different conditions.Methods: We used Google Insights to identify the 20 most searched for health conditions on Google and then searched eachof the resulting terms on Facebook. We compiled a list of the first 50 Facebook “Pages” results for each health condition. Afterfiltering results to identify pages relevant to our research, we categorized pages into one of seven categories based on the page’sprimary purpose. We then measured user engagement by evaluating the number of “Likes” for different conditions and types ofpages.Results: The search returned 50 pages for 18 of the health conditions, but only 48 pages were found for “anemia” and 5 pageswere found for “flu symptoms”, yielding a total of 953 pages. A large number of pages (29.4%, 280/953) were irrelevant to thehealth condition searched. Of the 673 relevant pages, 151 were not in English or originated outside the United States, leaving522 pages to be coded for content. The most common type of page was marketing/promotion (32.2%, 168/522) followed byinformation/awareness (20.7%, 108/522), Wikipedia-type pages (15.5%, 81/522), patient support (9.4%, 49/522), and generalsupport (3.6%, 19/522). Health conditions varied greatly by the primary page type. All health conditions had somemarketing/promotion pages and this made up 76% (29/38) of pages on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The largestpercentage of general support pages were cancer (19%, 6/32) and stomach (16%, 4/25). For patient support, stroke (67%, 4/6),lupus (33%, 10/30), breast cancer (19%, 6/31), arthritis (16%, 6/36), and diabetes (16%, 6/37) ranked the highest. Six healthconditions were not represented by any type of support pages (ie, human papillomavirus, diarrhea, flu symptoms, pneumonia,spine, human immunodeficiency virus). Marketing/promotion pages accounted for 46.73% (10,371,169/22,191,633) of all Likes,followed by support pages (40.66%, 9,023,234/22,191,633). Cancer and breast cancer accounted for 86.90%(19,284,066/22,191,633) of all page Likes.Conclusions: This research represents the first attempts to comprehensively describe publicly available health content and userengagement with health conditions on Facebook pages. Public health interventions using Facebook will need to be designed toensure relevant information is easy to find and with an understanding that stigma associated with some health conditions maylimit the users’ engagement with Facebook pages. This line of research merits further investigation as Facebook and other SNScontinue to evolve over the coming years.

(J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182) doi:10.2196/jmir.3275

J Med Internet Res 2014 | vol. 16 | iss. 8 | e182 | p.1http://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e182/(page number not for citation purposes)

Hale et alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH

XSL•FORenderX

29%(n=280)

No tenían nada que versobre la condición de

SALUD

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJ Med Internet Res 2014 vol. 16 issue. 8

Original Paper

Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: ContentAnalysis and Evaluation of User Engagement

Timothy M Hale1, PhD; Akhilesh S Pathipati2, BA; Shiyi Zan1, BS; Kamal Jethwani1, MD, MPH1Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare, Inc, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States

Corresponding Author:Timothy M Hale, PhDCenter for Connected HealthPartners HealthCare, IncHarvard Medical School25 New Chardon Street, Suite 300Boston, MA, 02114United StatesPhone: 1 617 643 9852Fax: 1 617 726 7530Email: tmhale@mgh.harvard.edu

AbstractBackground: A sizable majority of adult Internet users report looking for health information online. Social networking sites(SNS) like Facebook represent a common place to seek information, but very little is known about the representation and use ofhealth content on SNS.Objective: Our goal in this study was to understand the role of SNS in health information seeking. More specifically, we aimedto describe how health conditions are represented on Facebook Pages and how users interact with these different conditions.Methods: We used Google Insights to identify the 20 most searched for health conditions on Google and then searched eachof the resulting terms on Facebook. We compiled a list of the first 50 Facebook “Pages” results for each health condition. Afterfiltering results to identify pages relevant to our research, we categorized pages into one of seven categories based on the page’sprimary purpose. We then measured user engagement by evaluating the number of “Likes” for different conditions and types ofpages.Results: The search returned 50 pages for 18 of the health conditions, but only 48 pages were found for “anemia” and 5 pageswere found for “flu symptoms”, yielding a total of 953 pages. A large number of pages (29.4%, 280/953) were irrelevant to thehealth condition searched. Of the 673 relevant pages, 151 were not in English or originated outside the United States, leaving522 pages to be coded for content. The most common type of page was marketing/promotion (32.2%, 168/522) followed byinformation/awareness (20.7%, 108/522), Wikipedia-type pages (15.5%, 81/522), patient support (9.4%, 49/522), and generalsupport (3.6%, 19/522). Health conditions varied greatly by the primary page type. All health conditions had somemarketing/promotion pages and this made up 76% (29/38) of pages on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The largestpercentage of general support pages were cancer (19%, 6/32) and stomach (16%, 4/25). For patient support, stroke (67%, 4/6),lupus (33%, 10/30), breast cancer (19%, 6/31), arthritis (16%, 6/36), and diabetes (16%, 6/37) ranked the highest. Six healthconditions were not represented by any type of support pages (ie, human papillomavirus, diarrhea, flu symptoms, pneumonia,spine, human immunodeficiency virus). Marketing/promotion pages accounted for 46.73% (10,371,169/22,191,633) of all Likes,followed by support pages (40.66%, 9,023,234/22,191,633). Cancer and breast cancer accounted for 86.90%(19,284,066/22,191,633) of all page Likes.Conclusions: This research represents the first attempts to comprehensively describe publicly available health content and userengagement with health conditions on Facebook pages. Public health interventions using Facebook will need to be designed toensure relevant information is easy to find and with an understanding that stigma associated with some health conditions maylimit the users’ engagement with Facebook pages. This line of research merits further investigation as Facebook and other SNScontinue to evolve over the coming years.

(J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182) doi:10.2196/jmir.3275

J Med Internet Res 2014 | vol. 16 | iss. 8 | e182 | p.1http://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e182/(page number not for citation purposes)

Hale et alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH

XSL•FORenderX

29%(n=280)

No tenían nada que versobre la condición de

SALUD

168 32,2% Del resto, sólo de MARKETING

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFGráfico original de Los ciudadanos ante la e-sanidad. Instituto ONTSI. Julio de 2012

Barreras de INTERNET como fuente de información en SALUD

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFGráfico original de Los ciudadanos ante la e-sanidad. Instituto ONTSI. Julio de 2012

Barreras de INTERNET como fuente de información en SALUD

83,1%

INFOXICACIÓN

content curation

¿Cómo afecta la información encontrada?

61%Pacientes de

Atención Primaria buscaron en Internet

Marin-Torres V, et al. Internet como fuente de información sobre salud en pacientes de atención primaria y su influencia en la relación médico-paciente. Aten Primaria.Volume 45, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 46–53

92,4% encontró respuesta a sus dudas

#TICsFTPyENF

Marin-Torres V, et al. Internet como fuente de información sobre salud en pacientes de atención primaria y su influencia en la relación médico-paciente. Aten Primaria. 2012.

Cambios en el comportamiento entre los pacientes que utilizan internet como fuente de información de salud

53,5% Refiere haber cambiado algúna vez

la forma de pensar y en el 30% la de comportarse:

¿Por qué parece entonces que nos

cuesta adaptarnos?

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption ofInformation and Communication Technologies by HealthcareProfessionals

Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada, Centre de recherche du CHUQ, Hôpital St-FrançoisD’Assise, 10, rue de L’Espinay, D6-734, Québec City, QC G1L 3L5, Canada

Marie Desmartis,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada

Michel Labrecque,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Josip Car,Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London,London, UK

Claudia Pagliari,Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Pierre Pluye,Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

Pierre Frémont,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department ofRehabilitation, Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Johanne Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Nadine Tremblay, andQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada

France LégaréQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, CanadaMarie-Pierre Gagnon: marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca

Abstract

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010Correspondence to: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca.

PubMed Central CANADAAuthor Manuscript / Manuscrit d'auteurJ Med Syst. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 06.

Published in final edited form as:J Med Syst. 2012 February ; 36(1): 241–277. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4.

PMC

Canada Author M

anuscriptPM

C C

anada Author Manuscript

PMC

Canada Author M

anuscript

84MOTIVOS

en 101 estudios incluidos

se describen

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption ofInformation and Communication Technologies by HealthcareProfessionals

Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada, Centre de recherche du CHUQ, Hôpital St-FrançoisD’Assise, 10, rue de L’Espinay, D6-734, Québec City, QC G1L 3L5, Canada

Marie Desmartis,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada

Michel Labrecque,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Josip Car,Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London,London, UK

Claudia Pagliari,Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Pierre Pluye,Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

Pierre Frémont,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department ofRehabilitation, Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Johanne Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Nadine Tremblay, andQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada

France LégaréQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, CanadaMarie-Pierre Gagnon: marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca

Abstract

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010Correspondence to: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca.

PubMed Central CANADAAuthor Manuscript / Manuscrit d'auteurJ Med Syst. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 06.

Published in final edited form as:J Med Syst. 2012 February ; 36(1): 241–277. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4.

PMC

Canada Author M

anuscriptPM

C C

anada Author Manuscript

PMC

Canada Author M

anuscript

1 Factores Relacionados con las TIC

Factores Individuales (conocimientos y actitudes)2

Factores del entorno humano (pacientes)

Factores relacionados con la organización

3

4

Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption ofInformation and Communication Technologies by HealthcareProfessionals

Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada, Centre de recherche du CHUQ, Hôpital St-FrançoisD’Assise, 10, rue de L’Espinay, D6-734, Québec City, QC G1L 3L5, Canada

Marie Desmartis,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada

Michel Labrecque,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Josip Car,Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London,London, UK

Claudia Pagliari,Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Pierre Pluye,Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada

Pierre Frémont,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department ofRehabilitation, Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Johanne Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada

Nadine Tremblay, andQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada

France LégaréQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, CanadaMarie-Pierre Gagnon: marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca

Abstract

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010Correspondence to: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca.

PubMed Central CANADAAuthor Manuscript / Manuscrit d'auteurJ Med Syst. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 06.

Published in final edited form as:J Med Syst. 2012 February ; 36(1): 241–277. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4.

PMC

Canada Author M

anuscriptPM

C C

anada Author Manuscript

PMC

Canada Author M

anuscript

¿Y dónde dices que puedo

encontrar esa información?

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFInforme Janssen Top Ten en Salud 2.0 2015

¿Cómo estamos repartidos en Twitter?

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

Busca a los “Influencers” de tu sector

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

Busca a los “Influencers” de tu sector

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

Cuest. fisioter. 2014, 43(2):79-88

43,8%De los fisioterapeutas

encuestados (n=189) tenían perfil en Linked en 2012

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

!"#"$%&'()"(*+*&,%$',$#*-./0*)&,&%'(1"2,*3&*4(*'&3*)'$5&#"$,(4*6",7&3",*&,%'&*4$#*5"#"$%&'()&8%(#*&#)(9$4&#*

!"#$%&'"()*+#,*-.,/01,(-2%)&-3(-'$4,+(-(')*'%&-,&5,6%-7(.%-,+)&5($$%&-*8,-('9&)7,*3&-:,$+*-%$",+"#$%&'"()*+%$'$

:.*;(<2=>(?'(. !"#"$%&'()&*%(+,-$#)"%(.,/$#%(,0&.,1$.,234&56"(,1(5"%('"(,/$#%(,0&.,1$.7+,8$6(.,0&,/$9*5"6(6":5,;,<&0&#,1$=6"(.&#,&5,&.,>.*#%'&,/$.&4"$,?'$@&#"$5(.,0&,!"#"$%&'()&*%(#,0&,350(.*6A(+,BC.(4(+,D#)(E(

@.*!&''&'=:&9(. !"#"$%&'()&*%(+,/+1+,D5%'&FA(#,21D<B317+,?'&#"0&5%&,0&,.(,3#$6"(6":5,!"#"$%&'()"(,1"5,<&0+,?'$@&#$',G"%*.(',0&,.(,H5"F&'#"0(0,3*%:5$9(,0&,B(0'"0,/1DH=I(,1(..&+,B(0'"0+,D#)(E(

>$''&#)$,3&,1"(0 <&6"J"0$K,LM,N*5"$,OMLP

?(J.$,Q(F:,/(J'( 36&)%(0$K,OR,5$F"&9J'&,OMLP)(J.$0(F$6(J'(S49(".+6$9

A'"B",(4

/*&#%+,@"#"$%&'+,OMLTU,TP2O7K,VW=XX

CD

@EFGHEI

!"#$%&'(()*"+ &5,.(,(6%*(."0(0,&#,*5,Y&6Y$,Z*&,.$#,&5%$'5$#,O+M,;,.(#,'&0&#,#$6"(.&#,0&,*#$,)'$@&#"$5(.,#&,Y(56$5F&'%"0$,&5,*5,&.&9&5%$,9C#,0&5%'$,0&,.(,F"0(,0&,9*6Y$#,@"#"$%&'()&*%(#+,,-./#)0%1K,#&,)'$)$5&,'&(."[(',*5,&#%*=0"$,0&#6'")%"F$,%'(5#F&'#(.,)('(,F&',.(,)&5&%'(J"."0(0,Z*&U,&5,5$F"&9J'&,0&,OMLOU,%"&5&,.(,'&0,#$6"(.,I"5\&0"5,2I]7,&5%'&.$#,@"#"$%&'()&*%(#,&#)(E$.&#+,23#/$)3456578#%&%K,#&,(09"5"#%'(,*5,6*&#%"$5('"$,0"#&E(0$,3&9:%(5(,POW,@"#"$%&'()&*=%(#,Z*&,(#"#%"&'$5,(,0$#,&F&5%$#,6"&5%A@"6$#,'&.(6"$5(0$#,6$5,&5%$'5$#,O+MU,&5,&.,Z*&,#&,.&#,)'&4*5%(J(,#$J'&,#*#YCJ"%$#,0&,*%"."[(6":5,0&,"5%&'5&%,;,'&0&#,#$6"(.&#U,;,&5,&#)&6"(.,#$J'&,I]+,;/1'4#3&%1+5&.,XOUV,^,#&,6$5&6%(J(,9C#0&,L,Y$'(,(.,0A(,(,"5%&'5&%U,&.,TPUX,^,%&5A(,)&'@".,0&,I]U,&.,XVUO,^,%&5A(,9&5$#,0&,LMM,6$5%(6%$#,0&5%'$,0&,#*,'&0+,H5VXUV,^,'&@"'":,_9&N$'(',#*,'&0,0&,6$5%(6%$#`,6$9$,)'"56")(.,'([:5,)('(,0('#&,0&,(.%(,&5,I]+,D.,aVUR,^,0&,.$#,#*N&=%$#,6$5,)&'@".,&5,I],@$'9(J(,)('%&,0&,(.4b5,4'*)$,&#)&6"(."[(0$U,)&'$,&.,VV,^,'&@"'":,5$,)('%"6")(',5*56(U,$,0&,@$'9(9*;,$6(#"$5(.U,&5,.$#,0&J(%&#,Z*&,#&,9(5%"&5&5,0&5%'$,0&,&#%$#,4'*)$#+,<%"(4'1)%"/1K,&c"#%&,*5,J*&5,5"F&.,0&,)&=5&%'(6":5,0&,)&'@".&#,0&,I],0&5%'$,0&,5*&#%'(,9*&#%'(,(*5Z*&,5$,&#,&c%'()$.(J.&,(,.(,)$J.(6":5,%$%(.,0&,@"#"$%&'()&*%(#&#)(E$.&#+,?('&6&,Z*&,I],#&,)$#%*.(,6$9$,*5(,J*&5(,Y&''(9"&5%(,)('(,&.,0&#(''$..$,)'$@&#"$5(.,0&,.$#,@"#"$%&'(=)&*%(#U,(#A,6$9$,)('(,&#%(J.&6&',*5(,J*&5(,'&0,0&,6$5%(6%$#,;,&#%(',"5@$'9(0$#,#$J'&,#*#,"5%&'&#&#,)'$@&#"$5(.&#+1$5,5&6&#('"$#,@*%*'$#,&#%*0"$#,)('(,4&5&'(',&F"0&56"(,#$J'&,.(,*%"."0(0,0&,.(#,'&0&#,#$6"(.&#,;,.$#,&5%$'5$#,O+M6$9$,Y&''(9"&5%(,0&.,0&#(''$..$,@"#"$%&'()d*%"6$+

!*8*;)*$,<8*2(4 6*&#%"$5('"$U,9&0"$#,0&,6$9*5"6(6":5,#$6"(.&#U,!"#"$%&'()"(+

=>?@A=B@

e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

Cuest. fisioter. 2014, 43(2):79-88

67,5%forman parte de algún

GRUPO

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJournal of Nursing Education • Vol. 50, No. 7, 2011

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJournal of Nursing Education • Vol. 50, No. 7, 2011

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJournal of Nursing Education • Vol. 50, No. 7, 2011

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJournal of Nursing Education • Vol. 50, No. 7, 2011

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJournal of Nursing Education • Vol. 50, No. 7, 2011

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJournal of Nursing Education • Vol. 50, No. 7, 2011

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJournal of Nursing Education • Vol. 50, No. 7, 2011

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENFJournal of Nursing Education • Vol. 50, No. 7, 2011

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

10 Abril 2015

#TICsFTPyENF

Muchas Gracias

@_RaulFerrer #TICsFTPyENF