The Prophet Abraham was a non-Brahmin Indian!!!

--- Dr. Pratap Chatse, BAMCEF Supporter, India

(Abraham/A-Braham/A-Brahma/A-Brahman/Ibrahim Zeradust (@ 2000 - 1800 BCE)

1) Introduction

Abraham is one of the most central figures of Judaism, Islam and Christianity. Abraham is believed to have lived around 2000 BCE, and died at the age of 175 years, according to the Bible and Muslim sources. Abraham is of great importance to Judaism because he is the Patriarch of the Jews, through the line of his ‘Legitimate’ son, Isaac, Father of Jacob, who later became “Israel”. Abraham also is important to the Muslims because he is a prophet of the same message from God as Mohammed and the Father of ‘Ishmael’, his elder ‘illegitimate’ son, for whom God also had made a promise. In essence, Abraham is believed to be the Patriarch of Muslim’s through his son Ishmael. As God promised, Ishmael became the father of 12 princes (Gen 25:12-17), as well as a daughter, Mahalath, who later married Essau, son of Isaac (Gen 28:6-9). Ishmael was the father of the ISHMAELITES, who were the nomadic peoples that lived in northern Arabia. Modern-day Arabs claim descent from Ishmael. Ishmael died at the age of 137 (Gen 25:12-17). Thus, Abraham is the father of Jews and Arabs.

Abraham is understood by some as, “A-Brahma” meaning “a Brahmin”. However, this is completely a false meaning! The true meaning of “Abraham” is “non-Brahmin”. The aboriginal Indians were known as Asuras, Rakshasas, Dasas, and Dasyus; whereas, the invader Brahmins were known as Devas. The numerous Brahmanical religious texts like Vedas, Puranas, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Smrutis and Shruties are full with the struggles between Devas and Asuras. Thus, ‘Devas’ means ‘invader Brahmins in India; whereas, ‘Asuras’ means ‘aboriginal Indians. The Brahmins were calling Asuras as “A-Brahma”; means that, they are not Brahmins (A-Brahma= non-Brahmin). The word “Abraham” is derived from the root word “A-Brahma”. Thus, it means that, Abraham was not a Brahmin at all but as like the Asuras, he was an aboriginal Indian. His native place was known as “Ur”. The tribal republic (Gan- Parishad) of non-Brahmins was known as “Ur”, whereas; the tribal republic (Gan- Parishad) of Brahmins was known as “Brahma-deya”. Abraham was from ‘Ur’- it simply means that, he was the ancestor of aboriginal Indians.

The present Bactria (a region of ancient Afghanistan) was the locality of a prototypical Jewish nation called as ‘Juhuda or Jaguda’, also called ‘Ur-Jaguda’. This region was the part of ancient Indus civilization and its residents were known by various names like Asuras, Panis and Malihas. These peoples were the followers of Shraman religion. They worshipped their dead ancestors in the name of ‘Kula-Devas’. The word ‘Kula-Devas’ became ‘Chaldeans’ in later Hebrew language. Thus, “Ur” meant "place or town" and “Chaldeans” meant “Kula-Devas”. Therefore, the bible was correct in stating that, Abraham came from the "Ur of Chaldeans".

The genealogy of all Arabians and Jews starts from Abraham. It means that, the entire Arabs as well as Jews are the descendants of aboriginal Indians; they are not the descendants of Brahmins!

2) The native place of Abraham was Indus valley of India

The Indus civilization of India was an ancient civilization of the World. It was flourished in between 6000 to 4000 BC. The religion of Indus civilization was ‘Shraman religion’ and its priests were known as the ‘Shramanas’ and its philosophy was known as the ‘Shraman philosophy’. The priests of Indus civilization were the ruling kings of their times; who were known as the “priest-kings (Rajarshi)”. Ahi-vratra, Shambhar, Nimi, etc were such kind of priest-kings or Rajarshis of Indus civilization. Abraham was also the priest-king (Rajarshi) of Khaiber region of Indus civilization. After the fall of Indus, he and his peoples fled to the Middle-East and also carried their Indus religion with them. That’s why; it is stated in Exodus that, the Hebrews had started their career in history as a “Kingdom of Priests” (Exodus/19/6).

Abraham was the native of Khaibar region of Indus civilization. The Indus peoples were the worshippers of their dead ancestors to whom they were calling as the ‘Kula-Devas’. Since being the Indus resident, Abram and his family were also the worshippers of Kaul-Devas. This was his heritage. The word “Kula-devas” became “Chaldeans” in Hebrew language. Hence, Bible calls Abraham and his peoples as ‘Chaldeans’. Thus, Abraham and his peoples had inherited their culture from Sumeria (Shramana= Shramanaria= Shramaria= Sumeria), who inherited them directly from India. This shows that, Abraham and his follower Jews were the aboriginals of Indus civilization of India.

There are many striking similarities between the Brahmin god, Brahma and his daughter/consort/wife, Saraswathi, as compared with the Jewish, Abraham and his sister/wife, Sarai that seem more than mere coincidences. However, some Indian Brahmin thinkers are trying to equate their God Brahma and Saraswathi with the Biblical Abraham and Sarai. This is not true at all. It must be mentioned in this respect that, while Saraswathi is said to be the daughter of Brahma inAccordance with the Indian tradition, her Biblical counterpart, Sarai, has been described as the sister of Abraham.

Here, Sarai or Saraswathi is the name of Saraswathi River of ancient times. This Saraswathi river is depicted mythically as the daughter/consort/wife of Brahma in Puranas and as sister/wife Sarai of Abraham in Bible. It simply means that, the Brahma of Brahmins and Abraham of Jews dwelt on the banks of river Saraswathi during their early lives. Abraham was an aboriginal Indian ‘Asura’ (a non-Brahmin); hence, he was being called as ‘A-Brahma’ which became ‘Abraham’ in later times.

The Aryan Brahmins were originally the residants of the Prussian regions of Eurasian belt. They started invading India through the Khaiber pass in around 3100 B.C. They started an open war against Indus peoples in around 2000 B.C. Since then, there was an ongoing struggle between the invader Brahmins and native non-Brahmin Indians till the fall of Indus Empire in 1900 B.C. The invader Brahmins destroyed Indus dams to cause the downfall of Indus Empire. The destruction of Indus dams resulted in changing courses of Indus and Saraswathi River flows, which resulted

in drying up of the Saraswathi bed. The Biblical time-frame roughly corresponds to this drying up of Saraswathi River, which triggered mass migrations of Indians in both eastward and westward directions. The Brahmins migrated towards India in South-East direction with their leader Brahma; whereas, the Jews migrated towards the Middle-East in North-West direction with their leader Abraham. That’s why; Bible says that, Abraham and Sarai went to the Middle East to escape a terrible flood that had taken place in their original homeland of Indus civilization.

Joshua said unto all the people, “Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor, and they served other Gods. And I took your father Abraham from the other-side of the flood and led him throughout all the land of Canaan, and multiplied his seed.” - Joshua 24:2&3

It means that, Abraham and his peoples were originally residing on the Eastern side of Indus River (Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time). However, the heavy Indus flood caused them to migrate in the Western direction towards the Middle-East (And I took your father Abraham from the other-side of the flood). They served the other Gods means that, they were the followers of Indus religion and they worshipped the Indus Gods.

As like the Jews, the Persians and Arabs also claim Ibrahim (Abraham) as their founder. Thus, according to the ancient history, the Persians, Jews, and Arabians are the descendants of Abraham.

In ancient India, the Aryan cult of invader Brahmins was called as “Brahm-Aryan.” The Brahmins worshiped multiple gods. Since being an aboriginal Indian (Asura), Abraham was against the polytheism of Brahmins. That’s why; the Brahmins were calling him as “A-Brahm” (means, “not a Brahmin at all”). The Aryans were calling entire aboriginal Indians as Asuras i.e. “Ah-Brahm”. Therefore, we can logically assume that, Abraham, his fathers and his descendants were the peoples of Indus civilization, who were essentially the proto-Semitics.

Another interesting fact is that, one tributary of river Saraisvati was known as Ghaggar in India. Another tributary of the same river is Hakra. The bible states that, Ishmael was son of Hagar, and his descendants lived in India. "... (Genesis 25:17-18.) It means that, the Ishmaelites (Ishmaelites =peoples of Ishmael= Arabs) were the aboriginal residents of Hakra or Ghaggar, which was the small tributary of Saraswati river. The Hakra or Ghaggar was a small tributary of the big river Saraswati; hence, it is depicted mythically in Bible as the cocubin of Saraswati and its residents (Ishmaelites) were depicted mythically in Bible as illegitimate sons of Abraham. The Jews were the aboriginal residents of big river Saraswati, whose ruler-king was Abraham. Hence, it is depicted in Bible that, the Jews were the legitimate sons of Abraham.

The Indus peoples were known as Ahi peoples. They were the worshippers of snake deities (Naga or Ahi); hence, they were known as the Ahi peoples or Naga peoples (Ahi means Naga snake). Their chief king was Ahi-vritra, who was killed by the invader Brahmin leader, Indra. In later times, the word ‘Ahi’ became ‘Abhir’ (Ahi- ahir- abhir). From their name ‘Abhir’, the name of their locality came to be known as ‘Khaiber’ (Abhir= Aibhir= Ibhir= Iber= Ibri= Khibri=

Khaibri= Khaiber). These Ahi peoples of Khaiber region were known as the ‘Hebrews’ in later times (Khaibers= Khibreus= Khibrews= Hibrews= Hebrews).

Ahi peoples of Indus civilization were also known as the ‘Bhars’. This ‘Bhar’ word became ‘Bharat’, which is the name of India. (Ahi= Ahir= Abhir= Abhar= Bhar) (Bhar= Bharhut= Bharhat= Bharat)

To understand the significance of this, one must understand that, Bharata was not a nation but it was a collection of nations. India is the modern name of the land once called by its indigenous peoples named as “Ahis”- not in the context of a nation or country but as a collection of independent semi-cooperative individual nations, just as Europe is a collection of nations.

The Buddhists say that, the Abhira peoples (Abhiraans) spoke the language of “Abhira”. This Abhira language came to be known as Ahirani, Aramic and Hebrew languages in later times. (Abhira= Abhirani= Ahirani) (Abhira= Abhiramic =Ahiramic= Ariramic= Araimic) (Abhira= Abhiru= Aibrue= Hibrue= Hebrew)

The Yadavas, a seemingly proto-Hebraic people’s still living in India, also claim to have spoken a language called Abhiri or Sabari. Today, Israeli Jews whose roots sink deep into Israeli soil are called “Sabaras.”

3) Why Abraham abandoned India and migrated to the West?

The Indus civilization of India was an ancient civilization of the World. It was flourished in between 6000 to 4000 BC. However, the Prussian Brahmins invaded India through Khaibar Pass in around 3100 B.C. and they started attacking upon Indus civilization. A struggle between them and Aboriginal Indians lasted for more than thousand years and it was over in around 1500 BC. The invader Brahmins destroyed an Indus Empire in around 1900 B.C. and defeated the Aboriginal Indians. They started enslaving entire Indians in the name of ‘Shudra Varna’ within their Varna system. To escape from this Brahmanical slavery, some Aboriginal Indians started migrating in two different directions: one group migrated in the South-East direction and was known as the Shudra/Ati-shudras (today, they are known as Hindus); whereas, the other group migrated in the North-West direction towards the Middle-East and Europe and was known as Jews, Gypsy, Romani or Roma; Phoenicians, Greeks, Celts and so on. The evidence of this struggle and the migrations of aboriginal Indians are given in the Brahmins sacred books like Vedas, and later in the mythical epics like Mahabharata and Ramayana, various Smritis and Puranas which are in Sanskrit.

The Pani’s were aboriginal Indus trading peoples and were selling their things for their value. The word “Pani” indicates the dark skinned inhabitants of Indus valley civilization, i.e. they were an aboriginal Indians. As like the Pani’s, the Yuddhis were the warriors of Indus civilization. It is true that, the Pani’s were aboriginal Indus traders and the Yuddhis were Indus warriors and both of them were against the Vedic sacrifices of Brahmins like the Yagnyas and animal killings. Due to invasion of Prussian Brahmins, some of the Pani’s, as well as, the Yuddhi’s migrated towards

the Middle-East and Europe; they were known as the Phoenicians and Jews, respectively. The European aboriginals were calling them as Panih and the Romans were calling them as Punic. According to Gupta, the origin of Phoenicians lies in Afghanistan. Actually, before the Prussian Brahmins invasion, the Panis were residing in the regions of present Afghanistan, which was the North-Western part of Indus Civilization. It means that, the Phoenicians are the descendants of the Pani’s of Indus civilization.

Malati J. Shendge in her book named ‘Civilized Demons, the Harappans in Rig Veda’, states that, The Panis participated in the international trade, taking the caravans from place to place, supplying goods according to demand by bringing them from places where they were in surplus. (p. 222). Due to their rich trade, even Panama was named after them. In short, word ‘pani’ means ‘traffic’ i.e. moving from one place to another. The same meaning is found in the Nahuatl language: pan (means external location); pano; opano (means crossing to the other side), etc. (See Angel Maria GaribayÃs Llave del Nahuatl.) Even in our English language, the prefix ‘pan’ means crossing over or joining altogether, etc. E.g.Pan- America.

It means that, the Panis had transmitted their Indus civilization and culture all over the Western World up to its limits. That’s why; we can see numerous evidences of Indus culture among the Arabs, Egyptians, Greeks, Jews, Germans, Celts and all other Europeans.

Up to second century BCE, the Phoenicians still practiced child sacrifice. There are many archaeological evidences, which show that, the Canaanites of second millennium BCE followed the custom of child sacrifice owing to excavations of a shrine near the city of Gezer which has yielded clay jars containing the charred bones of babies. Note that the Celts, as indigenous peoples in Britain, were engaged in sacrifice (where apparently the victims were willing participants), right up to the Roman conquests. Similarly, the Incas were found performing the child sacrifices during the Spanish conquest. It means that, Celts as well as Incas were following the Indus culture since the times of Phoenicians. The tradition of ‘Child sacrifice’ is an Indus tradition. The children were sacrificed to the Indus mother Goddess named ‘Hariti’. This tradition was widely followed by Tibetans also. The aboriginal Indians are known as the ‘Sons of Hariti’; similarly, the entire Tibetans are also known as the ‘Sons of Hariti’. It shows that, the Tibetans are also the descendants of Indus civilization as like the aboriginal Indians.

Prof. Keightly says that, the Phoenicians called themselves as ‘Kedmus’. In the Semitic language, ‘Kedmus’ means ‘the East’. Actually, the Phoenicians had come from the East; so, they might have glorified themselves in the name of Kedmus, i.e., the Eastern people. This again shows that, the Romani as well as the Phoenician civilization had travelled from the East (from India) and not from Egypt.

Pockock in his famous book 'India in Greece' states that, (page 218), "There to the north dwelt the singularly ingenious and enterprising people of Phoenicia, and their first home was Afghanistan”.

It means that, the Phoenicians went from Afghanistan to the coast of Persian Gulf, from the Persian Gulf to the borders of Red Sea in Arabia and thence to Phoenicia, their last colony and home. Before colonizing Phoenicia, they had colonized Egypt, then, the islands of Mediterranean

Sea, then, they had colonized the Greece and in the adjacent countries. In short, the Phoenicians or Pani’s had travelled from East to the West. It simply means that, the Pani’s or Panih of Rig Veda were the same people as the ancient Phoenicians of Afghanistan.

The Brahmins were calling aboriginal Indians as “Asuras”. Some Asuras also migrated along with the Panis to the West after the fall of their Indus civilization. They were known as Azura, ahura and Assyrians in Persia. Thus, Assyrians are the aboriginal Indus peoples.

Signs of flooding were discovered during the excavations of Indus cities, mainly in the form of slit deposits. Since then, it was thought that, flooding was the basic cause for the fall of Indus cities and was considered as the most viable alternative to the idea of a Brahmin invasion. However, in later times, it was discovered that, the flooding had resulted due to invasion of Brahmins. The Brahmins had destroyed Indus dams and irrigation systems during their attacks and it was the basic reason for the flooding, fall of the Indus Empire and massive genocide. The evidences of these destructions are numerous in the Rig-Veda of Brahmins. Some of the examples are as follows:

He smote Vratra who encompassed the waters [RgV VI.20.2]. 

He smote Vratra who enclosed the waters, like a tree with the bolt [RgV II.14.2]. He is referred to as `conquering the waters' (apsujit), which is his prime attribute. Indra let loose the streams after slaying Vrtra [RgV IV.19.8]. He cleaves the mountian, making the streams flow [RgV I.57.6; X.89.7], even with the sound of his bolt [RgV VI.27.1] -- [RgV I.57.6; II.14.2; IV.19.8; VI.20.2; VI.27.1; X.89.7] [ST 368]

In the Sanskrit language, `Vrtra' means an `obstacle', and denotes a barrage or blockage [ISISH 70-71]. It is thus a word for `dam'. Dams are now called ‘Gebr-band’, which are found on many water-courses of the western parts of the Indus region. The Prussian Brahmins shattered the dam system of the Indus, leading to silt deposits in Mohenjo-daro [S & T 369].

Vratra is another name to the aboriginal Indians. “He smote Vratra” means the Prussian Indra killed an aboriginal Indian Vratra.

When he [Indra] laid open the great mountain, he let loose the torrents and slew the Danava, he set free the pent up springs, the udder of the mountain. [RgVV.32.1-2] He slew the Danava, shattered the great mountian, broke open the well, set free the pent up waters. [RgV I.57.6; V.33.1] He releases the streams which are like impisoned cows [RgV I.61.10] He won the cows and soma and made the 7 rivers flow. [RgV I.32.12; II.12.12] He releases the imprisoned waters [RgV I.57.6; I.103.2] He dug out channels for the streams with his bolt [RgV II.15.3], let the flood of waters flow into the sea. [RgV II.19.3] 

He caused the waters pent up by Vratra to flow [RgV III.26.6; IV.17.1] -- [MacDonnell] [S & T 368-9 quotg Macdonell]

Another verse explicitly metnions Indra as a destroyer of dams: rinag rodhamsi krtrimani = "he removed artificial barriers". [RgV 2.15.8]

The invader Brahmins destroyed Indus dams of aboriginal Ahi peoples, which caused the everlasting change in the courses of Indus and Saraswathi rivers. The classical geographer, Strabo tells us just how nearly complete the abandonment of Northwestern India was! Aristobolus says that, “when he was sent upon a certain mission in India, he saw a country of more than a thousand cities, together with villages, that had been deserted because the Indus had abandoned its proper bed.”(Strabo’s Geography, XV.I.19.)

The drying up of Saraswathi around 1900 BCE led to the major relocation of entire population centered around and in the Sindhu and Saraswathi valleys, causing a westward migration from India. Besides being driven out of Northern India by floods, the Aryans also forced Indian merchants, artisans, and educated classes to flee to the West Asia. It is soon after this time that, the Indic element begins to appear all over the West Asia, Egypt, and eventually, even Greece. Edward Picocke writes in India in Greece, “...in no similar instance have events occurred with consequences of such magnitude, as those flowing from the great religious war which, for a long series of years, raged throughout the length and breadth of India. That contest ended by the expulsion of vast bodies of men; many of them skilled in the arts of early civilization, and still greater numbers, warriors by profession. Driven beyond the Himalayan Mountains in the north, and to Ceylon, their last stronghold in the south, swept across the Valley of Indus on the west, this persecuted people carried with them the germs of European arts and sciences. The mighty human tide that passed the barrier of Punjab, rolled on towards its destined channel inEurope and in Asia, to fulfill its beneficent office in the moral fertilization of the world. The distance of the migratory movement was so vast, the disguise of names so complete, and Grecian information so calculated to mislead that, nothing short of a total disregard of theoretic principles, and the resolution of independent research, gave the slightest chance of a successful elucidation.”

Thus, the Prussian Brahmins had destroyed entire Indus civilization through flooding by destroying the Indus dams and releasing the dam water to flow freely. This incidence of “Indus flood” is known as “the great flood” in various religious books. We know that a flood drove Abraham out of India. "...Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, Even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor; and they served other gods. And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood, and led him throughout all the land of Canaan." (Joshua 24:2-3.)

It means that, Abraham was an aboriginal Indian and was residing on the Indian side of the flood. He and his peoples were following other Gods, means that, they were following aboriginal Indus culture. However, the invading Brahmins attacked on the Indus civilization and destroyed Indus dams leading to flooding. Due to these floods, Abraham had to abandon Indus and had to flee to Canan.

The aboriginal Indians peoples were knowns as “Yadavas” which are still seem among the O.B.C.’s of India. Lord Krishna himself was Yadava. These Yadavas were known as Judas in the region of Afghanistan. Judas then became Jews. Thus, Jews are the brothers of aboriginal Indian Yadavas!

All the above findings suggest that, the Jews, Phoenicians, Assyrians, and Arabs are the descendants of aboriginal Indus peoples. Also, all the Arabs, Jews, Egyptians, Greek-Romans and other Europeans were and are following the Indus culture and traditions!

The aboriginal Indus peoples were the followers of Ahi-vratra; hence, they were known as the peoples of Yah (Ahi= Yah). On the other hand, the invader Brahmins was not the followers of Ahis but they were the followers of Brahma; hence, they were known as the peoples of Brahma. The Ahi peoples (peoples of Yah) were the followers of one God (Monotheism); whereas, the Brahmin peoples (peoples of Brahma) were the followers of many Gods like Brahma, Vishnu, etc (Polytheism). Also, the Ahi peoples (peoples of Yah) were not idol worshippers; whereas, the Brahmin peoples (peoples of Brahma) were idol worshippers. The Ahi peoples were well developed, civilized, and were scientific and rational in thinking. That’s why; they were successful in creating a well developed Indus civilization during ancient times. On the other hand, the Brahmins were underdeveloped, uncivilized, barbaric, and evil and wandering peoples; they wandered from one place to another in search of food and shelter. Since being underdeveloped and barbaric, they were cruel and violent. They were attacking upon the settled and developed civilizations (like Indus, Mesopotamia and Mediterranean civilizations) to get food and shelter. That’s why; they attacked upon Indus civilization in around 2000 B.C. which caused a heavy food in Indus basic resulting in migration of Indus settlers in different directions throughout the World. Thus, the Jews (peoples of Ahi or Yaha) and the Brahmins (peoples of Brahma) are completely opposite to each other and there is an everlasting enmity between them since the fall of Indus civilization. The Abraham as well as Moses had started rebellion against the idol worship of Brahmins due to these reasons only!!

According to Akshoy Kumar Mazumdar in his ‘The Hindu History’, the Brahma was a spiritual leader of Aryan Brahmins. As an Aryan (Not of Yah), he naturally believed in idols. The Bible says that, he even manufactured them. Upon seeing how increasing idol worship and religious guesswork were contributing to the further downfall of his people, Abraham started opposing the devastating Aryanism and its evil idol worship. He also started re-embracing the ancient Indian (Yah) philosophy known as the Shraman Dharma, which was based on Matriarchal system (Cult of the Material Universe). The Indus civilization was Matriarchal; so, its cult was naturally based on the maternal worship.

This is paralleled in a story about Abraham in the Koran, when he turned away from his father’s business of manufacturing idols. The religion of Aryan Brahmins was an idol based, evil, barbaric oppressive, and enslaving in nature. The peoples were becoming corrupt, evil, selfish and oppressive due to the influence of such an evil religion. On the other hand, the religion of Indus civilization was based on equality, fraternity, brotherhood, justice and humanity. So, the wise men and educated people among the aboriginal Indians (proto-Semitics) isolated themselves from the masses. Abraham was also shocked at the barbarism and blind selfishness of the general people. Dr. Mazumdar wrote that, “The moral fall was rapid. The seers and sages

lived apart from the masses. They seldom married and were mostly given to religious contemplation. The masses, without proper light and leader, soon became vicious in the extreme. Rape, adultery, theft, etc., became quite common. Human nature ran wild”.

Abraham became very upset to see the downfall of his peoples. So, he decided to reform and to restore his faith and his people. He started a rebellion against the idol worship of Aryan Brahmanism and liberated his peoples.

One of the most important things is that, both Aryan Brahmins (believers of the Aryan faith) and Ahiyan Jews (believers of the Ahiyan faith) were the worshippers of God. The Jews and Indians were worshipping nature as a God (Monotheism) to pay tribute and respect to it. On the contrary, the Brahmins were worshipping nature in different forms (Polytheism) to fool the aboriginal Indians; so as to increase their influence in India. So, the single God worshipper Indians came under their bad influence and became Polytheistic until today. The migrated Indians in western direction (Jews) were also becoming the worshippers of many Gods (Polytheistic). Abrahams father himself had become such a kind of Polytheistic and idol worshipper. However, Abraham was aware of original Indus roots and its faith. So, he did a rebellion in his new settlement of Ur against this Brahmanical system and liberated his peoples. Thus, Abraham and his peoples (Jews) actually survived the original Indus civilization till now! We all aboriginal Indians must thank to them for this noble work!!!

The aboriginal Indians of Indus civilization were the worshippers of God; hence, they were regarded as the “peoples of God”. The Brahmins were worshippers of many Gods; hence, they were known as “the peoples of many Gods”. That’s why; even today, the Jews are known as ‘the peoples of God’; whereas, the invader Brahmins are known as the “peoples of Gods”.

4) The similarities between Jews and Indians

The peoples of Abraham were known as Jews. They are basically the descendants of Indus civilization. The aboriginal Indians (or Mulnivasi Bahujans) are also the descendants of Indus civilization. So, there are lot of similarities between the Jews and aboriginal Indians, because both of them are descendants of Ahi peoples of Indus civilization.

In his History of the Jews, the Jewish scholar and theologian Flavius Josephus (37 - 100 A.D.) wrote that, the Greek philosopher Aristotle had said: "...These Jews are derived from the Indian philosophers; they are named by the Indians, Calani."(Book I:22.)

Clearchus of Soli wrote, "The Jews descend from the philosophers of India. The philosophers are called in India, Calanians and in Syria, Jews. The name of their capital is very difficult to pronounce. It is called 'Jerusalem.'"

"Megasthenes, who was sent to India by Seleucus Nicator, about three hundred years before Christ, and whose accounts from new inquiries are every day acquiring additional credit, says that, the Jews 'were an Indian tribe or sect called Kalani...'" (Anacalypsis, by Godfrey Higgins, Vol. I; p. 400.)

Martin Haug, Ph.D., wrote in The Sacred Language, Writings, and Religions of the Parsis, "The Magi are said to have called their religion Kesh-e-Ibrahim. They traced their religious books to Abraham, who was believed to have brought them from heaven." (p. 16.)

The Magis are actually related to the Meghs of Norther India, who are treated as untouchables in Rajasthan. Both Magis and Meghs are the migrated Magadhan peoples (Magadhans= peoples of Maghadha).

Edward Peckoke writes, “Disastrous weather conditions appeared to fight on the side of Brahm-Aryans or Devas, as the enemies of the Kheeberis were called in those days. Serious flooding inundated the lowlands; a devastating earthquake caused the Indus River to change its proper bed. The existing coastline and seaports sank under the sea which moved inland by more than fifty miles. These natural calamities, plus about 1,500 years of fighting, finally brought the Indus Valley civilization to its knees in approximately 1,900 BC. Most of the Panis and Yuddhis abandoned India forever.

Abraham and Sarah, the ancestors of Hinduism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity, left with them. These hordes of refugees were mainly Javan (Yavana), young people, who were high caste leaders (Khatti, Kshatriya, or "Hittites" as we know them), warriors (Yuddhi or "Jews"), Panis (Phoenicians), skilled craftsmen, clerks, and other high level commoners (Marutta or "Amorites"), Kaul-Devas (Chaldeans or the priestly caste)  all of whom were Cabeiris or Quiviras (Phoenicians and Jews) i.e. Yadavas. Joining the descendants of those who had left India after the Great Flood, they brought new blood and vigor to Sumeria, Greece, Egypt, Israel, and Rome; to Mayapán, in Yucatan, the lands of the Incas and Moshicas in Peru, Chinese civilization, and to every other civilization on earth”.

The above passage states that, there was an enmity between Abraham and invading Aryan Brahmins. Indra, the chief army commander of invading Brahmins killed Ahi-Vritra (Yah-weh), the God-king of Indus civilization. He also destroyed the big Indus dams, which caused a heavy and disastrous flooding. This resulted in disastrous weather condition for Abraham and his Khaiberi peoples (Jews). Adverse conditions plus continuous attacks from Brahmins forced Abraham and Jews to abandon Indus and to take refuge in Cannan. These hordes of refugees were mainly Javan or young (Yavana); today, they are known as the Greeks (Yavanas or Ionions). Some of them were the earriors (Yuddhi); today, they are known as the Yadavas in India (Yuddhis= Yadus= Yadavas) and Jews in Israel (Yuddhis= Yadus= Judas= Jews). Some of them were the traders on water (Panis); who are known as the Phoenicians today. Some of them were the high level commoners (Maharatthas= Maruts= Amorites). Some of them were the priests of Indus civilizatation, who were known as the Kula-devas (Chaldeans or the priestly caste). All of them were the aboriginals of Khaiber region of Indus civilization; so, they were known as Cabeiri/ Quivira/ Cybera/ Quara/ Kubera/ Quivari/ Kuare, Kuala, Kualama, Kalami, etc, etc.

Meanwhile, back in Khyberia (the Khyber Mountain region), the Kheeberis discovered how to smelt copper; the discovery of copper was probably the greatest historical happening in the history of the world. There was no end to the demand, and the Cabeiris had a monopoly on the market, both national and international.

The boats of Phoenicians, accompanied by their warrior-trader partners, the Yuddhis, cautiously ventured beyond India. Competition in the copper market encouraged more and more Phoenicians to take to the seas. The Phoenician traders began to squabble among themselves, to see who got the best trade routes, seaports, and the like. A king of that time, possibly King Pancika (Phoenician), portrayed in the statue of him and his wife Hariti, shown in this article, ordered them to quit concentrating mainly on India and establish permanent colonies on distant shores.

King Pancika and his wife, Hariti.

For a while, the Khyberis/Cyberis and their subjects, both leaders and commoners, enjoyed the advantages of prosperity unequaled in the history of the world. To get miners and craftsmen, the Quivira ruling and merchant class offered high wages and innumerable fringe benefits. People probably risked their lives emigrating to Khaiberi, just as impoverished workers in Third World countries are now fighting to enter the United States. The miners, who were dwarves, were so vital to the success of the Phoenicians that they became deified, first under the Kassites and Hittites (the leadership caste of Phoenicians), and later among the Greeks as the Cabeiris.

Thus, the severe climatic changes in about 2,000 BC due to biblical flood plus more and more benefits across the World sent many hundreds of thousands of aboriginal Indians fleeing to the other countries. In this way, they became the fathers of Egypt, Greece, Rome, Sumeria, China, and other brilliant civilizations.

The ancient Indian caste divisions didn't work in the old days, just as they don't work now. Not everyone wanted to work at hereditary occupations. Little by little, these castes turned into so-called "ethnicities," becoming for us Brits or British (Bharats), Scots (Scythians), Goths (Jats), Welsh, Visigoths, Hittites, Kassites, Kushites, Amorites, Celts (Kelts), Canaanites, Palestinians, Jutes (Juddhis), Samarians (Shramanara), Scandanavians (Skanda-Nava), Hopi Indians (Hopis), Hispanics (Ishpanis), Nahuas of Mexico (Navajas, Sanskrit for "Sailor"), Ai-Guptos ("Egyptians," a word derived from a Sanskrit word Gupta, meaning a keeper of cattle) and variations of every other so-called "tribe" or "ethnicity" on earth.

Edward Pekocke writes,“Even though these twins had different religious beliefs and practices since remotest times, they

managed to be dedicated one for all - and all for one - musketeers in love, peace, and war for at least 4,000 years, according to authorities on the myths of the ancient Hindus. These two brothers were called Phoenicians and Jews (Hebrews). Webster's New World Hebrew Dictionary defines "Heber" as Kheeber, meaning "Connected; Joined" because they did colonize, rule, and inhabit every country on earth, also founding every civilization on earth, all human societies recognize their ancient hegemony both linguistically and mythically.

Let us now take a view of the maritime portion of this remarkable country, where the most interesting monuments still remain, establishing the fact of that ancient Greek connection with India, so often alluded to by so many writers, so pertinaciously denied by some, so suspected by others. There to the north, dwelt the singularly ingenious and enterprising people of Phoenicia. Their first home was Afghanistan, that is, the land of the Ophi-enses or Serpent Tribe ... whose symbol was the Serpent ... this people were styled Bhainikoi (Phainikoi) or "The Hyas." (pp. 218-219.).

... We have, then, in the Cabeiri, the representatives of a form of Bud-histic worship and Bud'histic chiefs, extending from the Logurh district (Locri) to Cashmir, the object of worship of the Hya (Yah), and the Phoenician race, for they are but one. They are the Khebrew-i, or Hebrews ... The tribe of Yudah (Judah) is in fact the very Yadu (Yadava) ... The people of God were literally taken out from amongst the other tribes, to be especially sanctified for the moral and religious generation of mankind”.

Their Sanskrit names, Pani (Trader) and Yuddhi (Warrior; Conqueror), clearly explain the part that each Hebraic clan had to play in this historic relationship.

In those remotest of times, places like Afghanistan weren't so barren and hostile to human life as they are now. The area was exceedingly fertile. As time went by, the Khyberis or Kheebers came to own all the arable land, creating vast feudal estates. Although their religion preached that mankind should be humanitarian, they became selfish and cruel to landless peasants and nomads. As their wealth in land and cattle grew, the nomads or Abels (not cattle), had less and less free space to graze their sheep and goats. Finally, the Khybers and the Abels began to make war on each other. Little by little, the Abels were absorbed into the feudal system as slaves. An enlightened king of the time, whom we now worship as Yahve or Jehovah, intervened in order to prevent a ghastly genocide. He ordered the settled Ganaana (Canaanites or Kheeberis) to quit monopolizing all the land and look for other ways to get rich, such as trading. Many of the Kheeberis, both traders and farmers, spread out, going down to what is now Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharasthra, and other parts of Western India. On the Western coast of Northern India, they built shipyards and started making trading expeditions abroad. Their Sanskrit names, Pani (Trader) and Yuddhi (Warrior; Conqueror), clearly explain the part that each Hebraic clan had to play in this historic relationship.

The Maruts were Indus peoples whose father was Rudra and mother was Diti. Malita J. Shendge states that, the Maruts were the Indus people. They were the enemies of Indra (Rig. 1.165-166). The Maruts were called as good Davavas (Su-Danav- Rig. 1.63-6). The Khatti (Hittites) and

Maruts (Amorites) functioned as the fathers (protectors) and mothers (helpmates or assistants) of Jerusalem. Thus, Hittites are the Khattis and Amorites are the Maruts of India.

The Varaha (Pig) was worshipped by the aboriginal Indus peoples. Rudra was called as “Amush-Varaha” (Rig. 1.114-5). Smililarly, Avesta calls Mithra as Varaha. The Varaha is worshiped in the form of Seres goddess by British, Siriz, Serideen or Carideen goddesses by the Romans. In Germany, Varaha is considered holy for the Freyer Goddess. In the Yule festival of Germany (Yule from Ilas Goddess of Indus), the Varah is sacrificed to the Goddess. The name of British city Yorkshire is derived from Aofor-wik (means the place of Varaha). Thus, the Indus culture was transmitted by the migrated Indus peoples in Europe.

The aboriginal Indus peoples were also called as Yakshas or Yakshus. Yadu or Yadavas were the descendants of these Yakshus (Yakshu= Yadu- YADAV). They were the worshippers of Varaha. ILA is the mother of Yakshus, Yadus and Yadavas. Yadu or Yadavas were the enemies of Indra (Rig. 7.19.8). YADU becomes YOUDAI-OI in Greece and JUDAS in Afghanistan. JUDAS came to be known as the JEWS in the Middle-East. Thus, the original homeland of the Jews is Afghanistan and they are the descendants of aboriginal Indus peoples.

Malti Shendge states that, "...it may be said that the region from Tigris-Euphrates to the Indus and its east was inhabited by the Akkadian speaking Semites who later called themselves as Asshuraiu. Their Indian name as known from Rigveda is 'Asura'. "The Temple of Mecca was founded by a colony of these aboriginal Indians. It was a sacred place before the time of Prophet Mohamed, and they were making pilgrimages to it for several centuries before him. Its great celebrity as a sacred place long before the time of the prophet cannot be doubted." (Anacalypsis, Vol. I). Thus, the Arabs are also directly linked to the aboriginal Indians.

All the above avoidances show that, there is a direct link between India and the West and there is direct influence of Indus culture on the West. After the fall of Indus civilization, there was a greater migration of aboriginal Indians in the Western direction towards the Middle-East, Europe, Africa and America. The Indus culture also travelled along with those peoples in these remote areas. That’s why; we can see thousands of evidences of its existence in these regions. On the basis of these evidences, some Brahmin intellectuals are trying to connect Brahmins with the peoples of West. However; Brahmins are connected only with Prussians, since, they are originated from them. After getting entered in India, Brahmins didn’t travel to the other countries out of India due to their own imposed religious rules of Brahmanism. The Manusmriti says that, no Brahmin can travel beyond the Oceans and beyond the Attak region of present Pakistan. If this is the situation; then, how Brahmins can claim their lineage with the Jews, Arabs, Greeks, Egyptians and the other Europeans? There are no evidences of this linkage at all. In spite of this, some Brahmin intellectuals are showing Indus evidences as their own evidences. This is nothing but an intellectual corruption and the false propaganda of Brahmins to show the false greatness of their Brahmin culture. All the aboriginal Indians, as well as, the Jews should be aware of this fact that, they both are related to each other and they should try to expose the Brahmins falsehood as well as they should try to find their Indus evidences at the national as well as an international level.

Some Indian Brahmins are trying to show their relations with Jews, which is completely false. Important thing is that, Brahmins try to show their attachments with those peoples who are powerful. Hitler was powerful during his time. At that time, the Indian Brahmins of RSS had contacted to Hitler to wage a war for establishing the Aryan Empire throughout the World. Hitler was considering himself as the tenth Avatar (incarnation) of Brahmin God Vishnu, due to influence of Brahmins! His spiritual teacher was Gayatri Devi, who was the wife of one Bengali Brahmin!! Hitler had massacred about 60 million Jews by coming under the bad and evil influence of Brahmanism!!! In short, Brahmins are responsible for this massive genocide of Jews! If this is the truth, then, how such kind evil Brahmins could be the brothers of the Jews? The Jews have become powerful today, so, the selfish Brahmins are trying to connect them with the Jews. This is the historical fact of the cunning Brahmins! During ancient times, the Vaishyas (traders) were not powerful; so, the Brahmins had declared them as the Shudras. On the other hand, the native Indian warrior Kshatriyas were powerful in India at that time. So, the Brahmins had done alliance with these Kshatriyas to be the supreme rulers of India. Now, the Kshatriyas have lost their importance and the Vaishyas have gained importance due to the era of Capitalism. So, the Brahmins have left Kshatriyas dubbing them as the Shudras and they have done alliance with the Vaishyas! See the abrupt change in their behavior!! They can’t be trusted at all!! So, the Jews should never trust upon them because are not trustworthy people!!

If some Brahmin intellectuals are trying to show the false evidences of linkage between the Jews and Brahmins; then, it is nothing else but an intellectual corruption and the false propaganda of Brahmins to show the false greatness of their Brahmin culture! The entire aboriginal Indians and the Jews should try to understand this fact that, both of them are related to each other and hence, they should try to expose the falsehood of Brahmins at the national as well as an international level. Similarly, both of them should try to connect with each other through our movement of BAMCEF and Bharat Mukti Morcha. As the representatives of aboriginal Indians (Mulnivasi Bahujans), we appeal to the entire Jewish brothers and sisters to get connected to us and our aboriginal Indian brothers and sisters…..

--- Dr. Pratap Chatse

References:-

1. See e.g. the fall/winter 1995 issue of Journal of Indo-European Studies, almost entirely devoted to the Xinjiang mummies.

2. I.M. Diakonov: On the Original Home of ther Speakers of Indo-European, Journal of Indo-Europen Studies, 1-2/1985, p.92-174, specifically p. 152-153.

3.  The Languages of Harappans:- Maliti J. Shendge4. India Once Ruled the Americas!—Edward Pococke5. Yadavas through the Ages, p. 90.6. Ancient Geography of Ayodhya- G. D. Pande7. [ Mackay ] = `Further Excavations at Mohenjo-daro', 2 vols. Delhi 1938; is an

investigation

8. 54. Rhys Davids, Thomas W. [1902] 1971. The Buddhist India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

9. J.Marshall, `Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization', London 193110. J.Oosten, `The War of the Gods: the social code in Indo-European

mythology' London 198511. M. Redford,`Egypt, Israel and Canaan in Ancient Times', Princeton 199212. M. Vats, `Excavations at Harappa' Delhi 194013. R.L.Raikes, `The Mohenjo-daro Floods', Antiquity 39 (1965) 196-20314. `The People of India' by Sir H.H.Risley 1915 

2nd ed., edtd. by Sir W. Crooke 196915.  `Ancient India', No.3 (1947) 82, SIr R.E.M.Wheeler16. `Civilization of the Indus and Beyond', London 196617. Donald Kenrick, "Gypsies: from the Ganges to the Thames. (Interface Collection,

Volume 3)," University of Hertfordshire Press, (2004).  18. `The Roots of Ancient India', W.A.Fairservis, Chicago University Press 196219. R.N.Frye, `The History of Ancient Iran', Munich 198420. A. Goetze, `Hethiter, Churriter und Assyrer', Breslau 193621. J. Gonda, `Vedic Literature', Wiesbaden 197522. W. Hale, `Asura in early Vedic religion', Delhi 198623. ` An Introduction To The Study of Indian History' , D.D. Kosambi Bombay 1956 ] =

ISIH24. F.Kaegi,`The Rigveda', London 188625. C.W.J.v.d.Linden, `The concept of deva in the Vedic Age', Utrecht 195426. MacCrossan, Tadgh. The Celts. Hinduism Today, may 1994 27. Berresford Ellis, Peter. A Dictionary of Irish Mythology, Oxford, Oxford University

Press, 1991. 28. historian A. D. Pusalker, whose essay "Traditional History From the Earliest Times" 29. Anacalypsis; Vol. I, p. 396.)30. Edward Pococke- India in Greece31. Indic Ideas in the Graeco-Roman World, by Subhash Kak32. Strabo's Geography, XV.I.19.33. Joshua 24:2-3.34. Martin Haug, Ph.D., wrote in The Sacred Language, Writings, and Religions of the Parsis35. Who Was Abraham? By Gene D. Matlock, B.A., M.A. 36. Anacalypsis, by Godfrey Higgins, Vol. I; p. 400.)37. Hemphill & Christensen: �The Oxus Civilization as a Link between East and West: A

Non-Metric Analysis of Bronze Age Bactrain Biological Affinities�, paper read at the South Asia Conference, 3-5 November 1994, Madison, Wisconsin; p. 13.

38. Vedic Mythology by Alfred Hillebrandt, transl. by Sreeramula Rajeswara Sarma, publ. Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1981 (orig. 1891)

39. Indo-European Language and Society by Émile Benveniste (transl. by Elizabeth Palmer, pp. 445–6; orig. title Le vocabulaire des institutions Indo-Européennes, 1969), University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida, 1973.

40. Sacred Books of the East, transl. by various Oriental scholars, series ed. by Max Müller, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1879–1904.

41. The Journal of Indo-European Studies, publ. by JIES, Washington, DC., 1973 and continuing

42. Mallory. In Search of the Indo-Europeans. 1987. p. 140.43. Lincoln, Bruce. Death, War, and Sacrifice: Studies in Ideology & Practice. 199144. Mallory & Adams 2006 , pp. 702, 780; Gamkrelidze & Ivanov 199545. MacCrossan, Tadgh. The Celts. Hinduism Today, may 1994 46. Berresford Ellis, Peter. A Dictionary of Irish Mythology, Oxford, Oxford University

Press, 1991. 47. R.L.Raikes, `The Mohenjo-daro Floods', Antiquity 39 (1965) 196-20348. Hirsch 1902: "Ur", by Emil G. Hirsch, Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol.12, p.380;

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com.

49. Jastrow Barton 1906: "Calf-Worship," by Morris Jastrow Jr. George A. Barton, Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol.III, p.510-511, http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com.

50. Matlock 2000: "Jesus and Moses are Buried in India, Birthplace of Abraham and the Hebrews", by Gene D. Matlock, Authors Choice Press, San Jose, imprint 5220 S 16th, Ste 200, Lincoln, NE 68512, Nov. 2000, $24, http://www.iuniverse.com.

51. Seligsohn 1902: "Star-Worship", by M. Seligsohn et al, Jewish Encyclopedia, 1902, Vol.11, p.527-528.

52. Shukla 1976: "Hebrews and Vedic Aryans" by Madan Mohan Shukla, (47, Kumar Bhavan, opp. M.M. Hospital, G.T. Road, Ghaziabad), Vishveshvaranand Indological Journal, Vol.XIV, Pt.1 (March 1976), p.41-47.

53. Shukla 1979: "The Hebrews belong to a Branch of Vedic Aryans" by Madan Mohan Shukla, Journal of the Oriental Institute, M.S. (Maharaja Sayajirao) University of Baroda, Baroda, Vol. XXVIII (March-June 1979) Nos. 3-4, p.44-57; Director, Oriental Insitute, Tilak Road, opp. Sayajigunj Tower, Baroda-390002, Gujarat, India; Rs.30/year.

54. Waddell 1929: "The Makers of Civilization in Race and History", by L.A. Waddell, 1929, reprint S. Chand Company, P.O.Box No. 5733, Ram Nagar, 7361, New Delhi-110055, 1986, Rs.400, http://www.schandgroup.com.

55. Walker 1983: "The Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets," by Barbara G. Walker, Harper Row, San Francisco, 1983.

56. The Civilized Demons- Malti J. Shendge

57. The original inhabitants of India- Gustav Opert

58. Vedic mythological tract, R.N. Dandekar, Ajanta Publications, Delhi, 1979

59. Material culture and social formations in Ancient India- R.S. Sharma, Macmillan India Ltd, 1983

60. An early history of Vaishali, from the earliest times to the fall of the Vajjin Republic- Yogendra Mishra, Motilal Banarasidas, Delhi, 1962