Proyecto “Implementación del Programa de Acción Estratégico del

Gran Ecosistema Marino del Golfo de México

Creacion de una Red de áreas marinas protegidasMéxico- Estados Unidos- Cuba

Alejandra NavarreteCoordinadora Nacional del Proyecto

2

Objetivo

Enfoque

ecosistémic

o

Esfuerzo

regional

Manejo del

GoM LME

Reducir la contaminación

Restaurar hábitats

Recuperar recursos marinos vivos

3

NAP

Análisis Diagnóstico

Transfronterizo

Programa deAcción

Estratégico (Bi-Nacional)

Programas de Acciones

Nacionales

2009-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

Estructura del proyecto: Componentes

TDA SAP

Productividad

Pesca y pesquerías

Monitoreo y salud del ecosistema

Gobernanza

Socio economía

Cambio climático y elevación del nivel del mar

Ed

ucació

n y D

ifusió

n

Implementar

acciones

en

cada país

Reducción de Contaminantes

Recuperación de RMVs

Restauración ecosistemas

Políticas y Estrategias

Multisectoriales

Mejora de la calidad de vida

Mitigación y Adaptación

National Project Coordinator

Secretarial Support Staff/Part time

CHAIR: SEMARNAT NOAA

Implementing Agency UNIDO

Proyect Steering Committee

Project AssistantNational Contract

Monitoring

Consultants

IMTA

NCPC

CONABIO INAPESCA FAO

CINVESTAV

UADY

INECOL

CONAGUA

HQ - VIENNA

• Lan Anh

Administrative-

Project Management

• Gabriela Cordova

International TEST

expert / Component

1

• Aymen

Procurement Officer

• Jesse Evaluator officer

• Christian Susan

Project Manager

6

Component 1

Improve water quality

GOAL Improve water quality through

EBM approaches

Output 1.1: Assess water pollution indicators and reinforce water quality monitoring mechanismsOutput 1.2: Strengthen the dialogue between government and industryOutput 1.3: Implementation of the TEST methodologyOutput 1.4: Implementation of the Environmental Monitoring Programme

7

Component 2: Avoid depletion and recover living marine resources (LMR ‐ Fish and shellfish)Output 2.1: Implementation of a joint stock assessmentOutput 2.2: Develop (Mexico)/amend (US) management plansOutput 2.3: Technical support to implement already existing management plansOutput 2.4: Implementation of FAO Voluntary Guidelines on Small Scale Fisheries

Component 2

8

Component 3: Conserve and restore the quality of coastal and marine ecosystems through community involvement and enhanced bilateral cooperation

Output 3.1 ‐ Community education programmes on domestic wastewater and solid waste sourcesOutput 3.2 ‐ Community based wetland restoration in selected sitesOutput 3.3 ‐ Improved coordination and bilateral cooperation through strengthening of networksOutput 3.4 ‐ Support effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas by linking them into networks

TOTAL: 7 activities

Component 3

9

Component 4: Monitoring, Evaluationand Dissemination of Results

Type of M&E activity Responsible Parties Budget US$ Time frameProject Steering CommitteeMeetings and Inceptionworkshop

Project Manager Project Team UNIDO Partner executing agencies

1st PSC Meeting will beconvened as an inceptionworkshop and PSC meeting.

1st PSC Meeting willserve as Inceptionworkshop and will beheld within first twomonths of project startup.

Inception Report Project Manager Project Team UNIDO Partner executing agencies

None Immediately followinginception workshop

Measurement of indicators setin the Logframe (ProjectProgress and Performance tobe measured on an annualbasis)

GEF IW Task Manager Project Manager

Costs to be determined aspart of the Annual WorkPlan's preparation.

Annually prior toAPR/PIR and to thedefinition of annualwork plans

APR and PIR Project Manager and ProjectTeam

Project GEF IW Task Manager Partner executing agencies UNIDO

None Annually

SUPPORT EFFECTIVENESS OF MARINE PROTECTED AREAS BY

LINKING THEM INTO NETWORKS

CONANP – NOAA National Marine Sanctuaries Work Group

Mexico focal points:

Ricardo Gómez Lozano; José Carlos Pizaña

USA focal points:

Bill Kiene; Other To Be Determined

Taking advantage of NOAA-Marine Sanctuaries Condition

Reports and CONANP’s INDIMAPA to create a tool for

improving the management strategies of Network sites.

The working group will hold thematic meetings each year to

develop and perform MPA condition evaluations and other

beneficial projects identified by the Work Group.

12

First meeting in Veracruz in September-October

2017.

Objectives:

• Share the methodological frameworks of NOAA-

Sanctuaries (ecosystem evaluation) – INDIMAP

(management effectiveness).

• Combine methodologies to develop an integrated

evaluation protocol.

• Identify the first MPAs to evaluate.

The second workshop planned for January-February

2018 will carry out the evaluation of the first MPAs

selected with the adapted methodology.

The methodology will be replicated in additional

MPAs in years 3 and 4 of the Project.

13

Products:

• Report of ecosystem condition at MPA sites.

• Identify strengths and weaknesses of MPA conservation strategies.

• Propose appropriate MPA management actions based on these

results.

• Design a toolkit for long-term evaluation and improvement of MPA

ecosystem and management performance that can be applied to a tri-

national Mexico-US-Cuba MPA Network.

• Create a state-of-the art atlas showing the habitats and communities

represented and protected by the Network of MPAs in the Gulf of

Mexico.

• Establish a tri-national agreement between Mexico, US and Cuba to

formally recognize the Gulf of Mexico MPA Network.

14

Hacia el cumplimiento de la Meta 11 de Aichi del Convenio de Diversidad Biológica

México

9

igura1. istribucióndelas reasdeConservaciónpropuestasparalacontabilidadhaciaelcumplimientodelaMeta11deAichienelconte todel

Conveniode iversidad iológica

CONANPCOMISIÓN NACIONAL

DE ÁREAS NATURALES

PROTEGIDAS

15

16

16

17

18

Workshops with experts to determine status and trends through answers to key questions

19

20

21

Alejandra Navarrete

a.navarrete@unido.org