Redalyc.The lower Mesozoic record of detrital zircon U-Pb … · 2015-03-25 · *...
Transcript of Redalyc.The lower Mesozoic record of detrital zircon U-Pb … · 2015-03-25 · *...
Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas
ISSN: 1026-8774
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
México
González-León, Carlos M.; Valencia, Victor A.; Lawton, Timothy F.; Amato, Jeffrey M.; Gehrels,
George E.; Leggett, William J.; Montijo-Contreras, Oscar; Fernández, Miguel A.
The lower Mesozoic record of detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of Sonora, México, and its
paleogeographic implications
Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, vol. 26, núm. 2, 2009, pp. 301-314
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Querétaro, México
Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57214961003
How to cite
Complete issue
More information about this article
Journal's homepage in redalyc.org
Scientific Information System
Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal
Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative
Lower Mesozoic detrital zircon geochronology of Sonora, México 301
ThelowerMesozoicrecordofdetritalzirconU-PbgeochronologyofSonora,México,anditspaleogeographicimplications
Carlos M. González-León1,*, Victor A. Valencia2, Timothy F. Lawton3, Jeffrey M. Amato3, George E. Gehrels2, William J. Leggett3,
Oscar Montijo-Contreras4, and Miguel A. Fernández5
1 Estación Regional del Noroeste, Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 1039, 83000 Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
2 Geosciences Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.3 Department of Geological Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88003, USA.
4 Posgrado en Ciencias de la Tierra, Estación Regional del Noroeste, Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 1039, 83000 Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
5 Servicios Industriales Peñoles S.A. de C.V., Blvd. Navarrete 277, Colonia Racquet Club, 83200 Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
ABSTRACT
Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology from each of the formations of the Triassic-Lower Jurassic Barranca and El Antimonio groups of central and northwestern Sonora and from the Lower Jurassic Basomari and Middle Jurassic Lily formations of northern Sonora indicate they contain distinctive zircon populations. A Proterozoic population has peak ages near 1.8, 1.7, 1.6, 1.4, and 1.1 Ga. A population of Permo-Triassic grains with important peak ages near 269, 254, 245, 234 and 227 Ma. A third population of Early Jurassic age (~190 Ma) is only present in the middle member of the Lower Jurassic Sierra de Santa Rosa Formation and in the Basomari Formation. The fourth population of Middle Jurassic zircons with age peaks near 168 and 162 Ma is only present in the Lily Formation. A fifth population of Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic zircons, present only in the Basomari and Lily Formations, has Silurian and Devonian grains (~430 – 380 Ma) and Neoproterozoic grains (590 – 547 Ma). Possible source areas for these populations are Proterozoic igneous and metamorphic basement and/or Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic sandstones of southwestern USA and Sonora, the mostly Triassic magmatic arc of the Mojave Desert in California and the Permo-Triassic arc of northern Mexico, the Jurassic continental magmatic arc of southwestern North America, and the Jurassic eolian sand seas in Arizona.
Regional lithofacies, fossils, and paleocurrents indicate that the Barranca Group records a large fluvio-deltaic system on the margin of the El Antimonio marine basin, and Proterozoic and Permo-Triassic zircon populations common to the Barranca and El Antimonio Groups indicate that detritus was derived from the same source areas to the north. Lithofacies, age, and detrital zircon populations of the Basomari and Lily Formations indicate that they were deposited within the Jurassic magmatic arc of North America. The Basomari and Lilly Formations contain abundant Early Jurassic zircon grains, as does the middle member of the Sierra de Santa Rosa Formation; however, the Sierra de Santa Rosa Formation lacks a Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic grain population present in the Basomari and Lily Formations. The Basomari Formation, which is located north of the proposed trace of the Mojave-Sonora megashear, contains Proterozoic granitic clasts derived from Caborcan basement, which suggests that the Caborca block must have been located close to the Basomari basin by Early Jurassic time, a relation that contradicts the existence of the Mojave-Sonora megashear. The new data also indicate a maximum Early Triassic
Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, v. 26, núm. 2, 2009, p. 301-314
González-León,C.M.,Valencia,V.A.,Lawton.T.F.,Amato,J.M.,Gehrels,G.E.,Leggett,W.J.,Montijo-Contreras,O.,Fernández,M.A.,2009,ThelowerMesozoicrecordofdetritalzirconU-PbgeochronologyofSonora,México,anditspaleogeographicimplications:RevistaMexicanadeCienciasGeológicas,v.26,núm.2,p.301-314.
González-León et al.302
depositional age for the previously undated Arrayanes Formation and correlation with the Antimonio Formation on the basis of a shared young detrital zircon peak age at ~254 Ma. A Coyotes Formation sample fails to confirm its supposed Early Jurassic age as it only yielded Proterozoic grains. Young zircon grain ages in the Lily Formation indicate a maximum Middle Jurassic age for that formation.
Key words: detrital zircon, Barranca Group, El Antimonio Group, Triassic-Jurassic, Sonora, Mexico.
RESUMEN
Nuevas edades obtenidas del fechamiento U-Pb de circones detríticos de cada una de las formaciones de los grupos El Antimonio y Barranca (Triásico-Jurásico), así como de las formaciones jurásicas Basomari y Lily, de Sonora, permiten distinguir las siguientes poblaciones de circones detríticos. Una población proterozoica que da grupos de edad cercanos a 1.8, 1.7, 1.6, 1.4 y 1.1 Ga. Una población permo-triásica que da grupos de edades cercanas a 269, 254, 245, 234 y 227 Ma. Una tercera población de edad jurásica temprana (~190 Ma) que sólo se presenta en el miembro medio de la Formación Sierra de Santa Rosa y en la Formación Basomari. La cuarta población sólo se encuentra en la Formación Lily y consiste en grupos de circones que dan edades de 168 y 162 Ma. La quinta población es de circones neoproterozoicos (edades entre 590 y 547 Ma) y paleozoicos (silúricos y devónicos; edades entre 430 y 380 Ma) y está presente en las formaciones Basomari y Lily. Las posibles áreas fuente para estas poblaciones de circones detríticos son los basamentos proterozoicos y/o las secuencias sedimentarias neoproterozoicas y paleozoicas del suroeste de los Estados Unidos y Sonora; el arco magmático de edad principalmente triásica del Desierto Mojave en California y el arco permo-triásico del norte de México; el arco magmático continental jurásico del suroeste de los Estados Unidos y el norte de México, y los campos eólicos jurásicos del centro-norte de Arizona. Las litofacies, fósiles y datos de paleocorrientes conocidos del Grupo Barranca indican que su deposito se debió a un importante sistema fluvio-deltáico que desembocaba en las áreas marginales de la cuenca marina donde se depositó el Grupo El Antimonio y sus poblaciones de circones proterozoicos y permo-triásicos indican que sus detritos fueron derivados de áreas localizadas hacia el norte de Sonora.
Las litofacies, edad y poblaciones de circones detríticos de las Formaciones Basomari y Lily muestran que estas unidades fueron depositadas dentro del arco magmático jurásico y comparten su población de circones de ~190 Ma con el miembro medio de la Formación Sierra de Santa Rosa, la cual, sin embargo, no contiene los circones neoproterozoicos que sí tienen esas dos unidades. A pesar de estas diferencias, la Formación Basomari que se localiza al norte de la traza propuesta de la megacizalla Mojave-Sonora contiene clastos ígneos del basamento del bloque Caborca, lo cual sugiere que ambas entidades deben haber estado localizadas en posición cercana durante el Jurásico Temprano, no apoyando de esa manera la idea de la existencia de la mencionada falla. Los nuevos datos proveen además una edad máxima del Triásico Temprano para la Formación Arrayanes, ya que la edad más joven de un grupo de sus circones detríticos es de 254 Ma, el cual también está presente en la Formación Antimonio. Los circones datados de la Formación Coyotes no probaron su supuesta edad jurásica temprana ya que sólo proporcionaron edades proterozoicas, mientras que los grupos más jóvenes de circones detríticos de la Formación Lily proporcionaron una edad máxima de Jurásico Medio para esa unidad.
Palabras clave: circones detríticos, Grupo Barranca, Grupo El Antimonio, Triásico-Jurásico, Sonora, México.
INTRODUCTION
Recentadvancesinlaserablationinductivelycoupledmassspectrometrypermitanalysisoflargenumbersofdetritalzirconagesinsedimentaryunits.Determinationofzirconages,combinedwithknowledgeofstratigraphy,sedimentologyandbiostratigraphy,providesusefulinfor-mationthatcontributestotheunderstandingofdifferenttectonicproblems,includingevolutionofbasins,prov-enanceandpaleogeography.Forinstance,adetritalzirconreferenceframehasbeenadvancedintherecentyearsforthe
NeoproterozoictoTriassicstrataofwesternNorthAmericawiththeobjectiveofconstrainingtheterraneevolutionofthatregion(Gehrels,2000);theresultingdatasetprovidesabasisofcomparisonfordatafromawidearea.
AprovenancedatasetfortheNeoproterozoicandPaleozoicmarinesandstonesofSonora,basedonU-Pbgeo-chronologyofdetritalzircons,hasrecentlyemergedastheresultofanumberofseparatestudies.QuartzarenitesfromtheNeoproterozoicLasViboras,ElAguilaandCerroLasBolasgroups(Stewartet al.,2002;IzaguirreandIriondo,2007)thatextendfromnorthwesterntosouth-centralSonora
Lower Mesozoic detrital zircon geochronology of Sonora, México 303
ofSonoramaybetheProterozoicbasementofsouthwesternUSAandSonora(e.g.,Karlstromet al.,1990,2004;GehrelsandStewart,1998;Stewartet al.,2001;Iriondoet al.,2004;AndersonandSilver,2005;Farmeret al.,2005;Nourseet al.,2005;Amatoet al.,2008a,Pooleet al.,2008),althoughPooleet al.(2008)havesuggestedthatsomedetritusinthePermianforedeepsequencemaybederivedfromanevolv-ingaccretionarywedgetothesouth.
PreviouslypublisheddetritalzircongeochronologyforlowerMesozoicstrataofSonoraisrestrictedtoafewsandstonesamplesof theTriassicandLowerJurassicBarrancaandElAntimoniogroups(Figure1).ResultsofdetritalzirconanalysisfromthreesandstonesamplesoftheElAntimonioGroupwerereportedbyGonzález-Leónet al.(2005)andtheresultsofonesamplefromtheSantaClaraFormationoftheBarrancaGroupwerepreviouslyreportedbyGehrelsandStewart(1998).Inthispaper,wereportnewdataondetritalzircongeochronologyfromeachofthesixrepresentativeformationsthatcomposetheTriassic-LowerJurassicBarrancaandElAntimoniogroupsofcentraland
haveyieldeddistinctiveProterozoicpopulationswithpeaksonrelativeprobabilitydistributiondiagrams(Ludwig,2003)near1.7,1.4and1.1–1.0Ga,whereastheNeoproterozoictoearlyPaleozoicCordilleranmiogeoclinalsuccessionofnorthwesternSonorayieldeddetritalzirconpopulationpeakswithagesaround1.1and0.68Ga(Stewartet al.,2001).TheCambrianProveedoraandBolsaQuartziteshaveadominantpopulationwithapeakaround1.1Gaandminorpeaksat1.7,1.4and1.2Ga(GehrelsandStewart,1998;Grosset al.,2000;Stewartet al.,2001).OtherPaleozoicsandstonesfromtheeugeoclinalandmiogeoclinalsucces-sionsofSonoraalsoyieldeddistinctivezirconpopulations.Ordovicianmiogeoclinalandeugeoclinalstratayieldedzirconswithagesthatclusterat~1.8Ga,~1.1GaandanArcheanpeakat~2.7Ga(GehrelsandStewart,1998);theDevonianandPermianmiogeoclinalandeugeoclinalstratayieldedmainagegroupsat~1.9,~1.7-1.6,~1.4and1.1–1.0Ga(GehrelsandStewart,1998;Pooleet al.,2008).ThisreferencedatasetindicatesthatsourceareasformostofthedetritalsedimentsoftheNeoproterozoicandPaleozoicstrata
Figure1.MapofSonorashowinglocalitiesmentionedandmainoutcropsofrockunitsdescribedinthiswork.Msm:proposedtraceoftheMojave-Sonoramegashear(fromAndersonandSilver,1981).
González-León et al.304
northwesternSonora,respectively.WealsoreportnewdataobtainedfromonesamplecollectedfromtheLowerJurassicBasomariFormationandfromtwosamplesoftheMiddleJurassicLilyFormation.ThesenewanalysescontributetoamorecompletedatasetondetritalzircongeochronologyfortheMesozoicstratigraphyofSonora,whichinturnshedslightontheinterpretationofdetritalprovenanceoftheseunits.OurresultsprovideabetterunderstandingoftheTriassicandJurassicpaleogeographyofSonoraandhaveimplicationsfortheexistenceofmajorMesozoicstrike-slipfaultinginSonora,especiallyinviewofthefactthattheBarrancaandElAntimoniogroupsarelocatedsouth,andtheBasomariandLilyformationsarelocatednorthofthehypotheticaltraceoftheMojave-Sonoramegashear(SilverandAnderson,1974).
TRIASSIC AND JURASSIC STRATA
Triassic and Lower Jurassic strata present innorthwesternandcentralSonoraincludetheBarranca(Alencáster,1961a)andElAntimonio(González-Leónet al.,2005)groups(Figure1).TheBarrancaGroupisdividedintotheArrayanes,SantaClaraandCoyotesformations(Alencáster,1961a)andtheElAntimonioGroupconsistsoftheAntimonio,RíoAsunciónandSierradeSantaRosaformations(Hardy,1981;LucasandEstep,1999;González-Leónet al.,2005)(Figure2).StrataoftheBarrancaGroupareestimatedtobe~3.5kmthickandrepresentmostlyalluvial, fluvial, and transitional deltaic to shallow-marine deposits. The lowermost Arrayanes Formation records flu-vialdeposition;MarzolfandAnderson(2005)assignedita
Figure2.StratigraphiccolumnsandcorrelationoftheElAntimonioandBarrancagroups,andtheRanchoBasomariandLilyformations.Starsandnumbersindicatestratigraphicpositionofdatedsamples.
Lower Mesozoic detrital zircon geochronology of Sonora, México 305
MiddletoLateTriassicagebasedontectono-sequencecor-relations.TheSantaClaraFormationistheonlyfossiliferousunit of the group and includes fluvial, deltaic, and shallow-marineterrigenousstratathathaveanabundantLateTriassic(Carnian-Norian?) paleoflora (Weber, 1997, and references therein)anduncommonmarinefossils(Alencáster,1961b).AlluvialconglomerateoftheCoyotesFormationuncon-formablyoverlietheSantaClaraFormationanditsageisinferredtobeEarlyJurassic(Alencáster,1961a;StewartandRoldán-Quintana,1991).
TheElAntimonioGroup(3.5kmthick)isdividedinto14marinesequencesintheSierradelÁlamo(Figures1and2),thelowermostofwhichisLatePermianinage(González-León,1997).TheTriassicAntimonioFormationcomprisessequencesIItoVIandspanstheDienerian(?),Spathian,Anisian,Ladinian(?)andCarnianstagesaccordingtopaleontologicandpaleomagneticdata(summarizedinGonzález-Leónet al.,2005;Steineret al.,2005).TheRíoAsunciónFormationincludessequencesVIItoIX(NoriantoRhaetian).Anerosionaldisconformitythatoverliesse-quenceIXseparatestheLowerJurassicSierradeSantaRosaFormation(sequencesXtoXIV)fromtheTriassicstrata.PartialoutcropsoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormationoccuratseveralotherlocalitiesinnorthwesternSonora,includingthehillssouthofSierraCaracahui,SierraLópez(GameñoFormationofPooleet al.,2000)andPozodeSerna(Figure1),althoughthemostcompletesection,besidesSierradelÁlamo,isatSierradeSantaRosa(Figures1and2),wherethe formation was defined and divided into lower, middle, anduppermembers(Hardy,1981).
OtherJurassicunitsinSonorathatpertaintothisstudyaretheBasomariandLilyformations,whichcropoutnearRanchoBasomari,southwestofCucurpe,andatSierraCopercuin,westofNacozari,respectively(Figures1and2).TheBasomariFormationis~750mthick;itslowermost140mcomprisesdarkpurplemassivesiltstonewithinterbeddedmatrix-supported,poorlysorted,sub-roundedtosubangular,granule-topebble-conglomeratewithlocallargeolistolithicblocksofPaleozoic(?)limestone.Upsection,a340mthickintervalconsistsofgranulesand-stonewithinterbedded,lenticular,poorlysorted,subangu-lar,massive,matrix-toclast-supportedpebbletocobbleconglomerateinbedsupto10mthick.Theupperpartofthisformationconsistsofthickmassivesandstone(upto50mthick)withlensesofgranuleconglomerate,intervals(upto30mthick)ofmassivesiltstoneandrhyolitictuffsintheuppermostpartofthisunit.Clastsintheconglomer-atearequartzite,porphyrygranite,metamorphicrocks,andesite,sandstone,basaltandchert.ItsEarlyJurassicageisindicatedbyarhyolitetuffinitsupperpartthatwasdatedat189.2±1.1Ma(U/Pb;Leggettet al.,2007).Thisformation,whichunderliestheRanchoSanMartinFormation(Leggettet al., 2005), is here interpreted as a flu-vialandalluvialcontinentaldepositbasedonlithologyandabsenceoffossils.
TheLilyFormation(McAnulty,1970)isa500m
thicksuccessioncomposedinitslowerpartofinterbeddedrhyolitic tuff and welded tuff, quartz-rich and arkosic fluvial sandstoneandpolymicticpebbleconglomerate.Itsupperpartconsistsofquartzarenite,conglomerate(withclastsofquartzarenite,andesite,rhyoliteandgraniticrocks)andsubordinate,lacustrinelimestonebeds.Thisunitcropsoutin the western flanks of Sierras Copercuin and Cobriza in northeasternSonora(about10kmwestofNacozari,Figures1and2)whereitisinfaultcontactwiththeCambrianBolsaQuarziteandintrudedbyLaramideplutons.TheageofthisunitisMiddleJurassicaccordingtoaU/Pbageof174MaobtainedbyAndersonet al.(2005)fromatuffcollectedatSierraCopercuin.ThisunitisconsideredcorrelativewiththeRanchoSanMartinFormationwhereLeggettet al.(2007)reportedaU/Pbageof168.4±1.6Mafromarhyolitic ash flow tuff.
DETRITAL ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY
Mineralseparations,andU-Pbgeochronologyonin-dividualdetritalzircongrainsofthesampleswasconductedbylaser-ablation-multicollectorinductivelycoupledplas-ma-massspectrometry(LA-MC-ICP-MS)attheArizonaLaserChronCenterintheDepartmentofGeosciences,UniversityofArizonausingtheproceduresdescribedbyGehrelset al.(2006).AnalyticaldataofthestudiedsamplesarereportedintheTableA1(electronicsupplement)andtheirageprobabilitycurvesarepresentedinrelativeprob-abilitydistributiondiagrams(Ludwig,2003)inFigure3.ThePb/UconcordiaplotsarepresentedinFigure4.Allageerrors are quoted at 1σ (Ma) level, and errors for isotopic ratios are quoted at 1σ (%). All reported UTM sample loca-tionsutilizetheWorldGeodeticSystem1984.
Samples2000-1,2000-0and2000-2fromtheElAntimonioGroup(Figure1)werefirstanalyzedusingisotopedilutionandthermalionizationmassspectrometry(Gehrels,2000)andresultsfrom20grainspersamplewerereportedinGonzález-Leónet al.(2005).Forthepresentstudywereanalyzedca.100grainsfromsamples2000-1and2000-0ofTriassicageandcollectedandanalyzedanewsample(4-5-08-1)fromtheLowerJurassicsequenceXIintheSierradelÁlamo.
Sample2000-1(UTM12R:347580E,3402960N)isfromamedium-grainedsandstoneinthelowerpartofSpathiansequence3oftheAntimonioFormation.EightypercentofthetotalzircongrainsareProterozoicwithagesnear1.7,1.4and1.1Gaandapeakageat1.7Ga.EightgrainsyieldedPermo-Triassicagesbetween267and240Mawith a peak at ~254 Ma, five grains have ages between 640 and420Ma,andthreegrainsyielded,althoughdiscordant,agesbetween2.7and2.6Ga(Figures3aand4).Sample2000-0,collectedfromamedium-grained,shallowmarinesandstoneoftheNoriansequenceVIIoftheRíoAsunciónFormation(UTM12R:351461E,3399957N),yieldedmostly grains with Proterozoic ages (~90%) with a major
González-León et al.306
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Ma
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
5
10
15
20
25
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Ma
0
5
10
15
20
0
5
10
15
20
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
5
10
15
20
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Ma
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Ma MaMa
RIO ASUNCION FORMATION227
1138 1461
1778
ANTIMONIO FORMATION254
1101
12241467
1764
2624
Num
ber o
f Ana
lysi
s Relative
probability
ARRAYANES FORMATION
SANTA CLARA FORMATION
COYOTES FORMATION1428
1637
231
245
1095
1417 17181849
248-254
1090
1436
16371702
BASOMARI FORMATION190
243-257
378-433
1059-11281414-1482
1742
LILY FORMATION 2
LILY FORMATION 1
412-422
547-5901024-1199
1421 1889
164-168
a) b) c)0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
SANTA ROSA FORMATION & 2000-2
234
1115-1148
1713
193
1080
2
6
10
14
200 300
231
244 256
269
0
4
8
12
16
200 300
248-254
2840
2
4
200 300
240
254
0
4
8
200 300
227
238
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
200 300
234228
218
05
10152025
200 300
164-168
217 278 332
261014
200 300 400
214 297
157-162
412-422
157-162
02468
200 300 400
190243-257
302 406433378
4-5-08-1 n=93
2000-0 n=99
Mina La Lourdes n=87
Lily 2 n=88
2000-1 n=103
7-26-07-1 n=98
Lily 1 n=93
WL01405Z n=95
7-28-07-1 n=92
peakat1.7Ga,andasmallpopulationofTriassicgrains(~10%) with a peak at 227 Ma (Figure 3a). Sample 4-5-08-1 wascollected(UTM12R:351169E,3399907N)fromabedof medium-grained, fluvial sandstone that overlies a 20-m-thickclastsupportedconglomerate(lowerpartofunit17inGonzález-León,1997)locatedatthebaseofsequenceXIoflateSinemurianage(PálfyandGonzález-León,2000;Tayloret al.,2001).Thissampleyieldedazirconpopulationof Proterozoic grains (78% of the grains) with peaks at 1.7 and 1.1 Ga and a Triassic population (22% of the grains) withapeakat234Ma(Figure3a).Sample2000-2fromtheyounger(lowerPliensbachian,PálfyandGonzález-León,2000)middlememberoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormationatSierradeSantaRosa(Figure2)wasreportedbyGonzález-Leónet al.(2005)tocontainLowerJurassicgrainswithapeak at 193 Ma (~55% of the grains) and Proterozoic grains withapeakat~1.1Ga(Figure3a).
ZirconswereseparatedfromsandstonesamplesoftheArrayanes,SantaClaraandCoyotesformationsoftheBarrancaGroup,yieldingthenextresults(Figure3b).Anarkosic,medium-grainedsandstonefromtheLowerMemberoftheArrayanesFormation(sample7-
26-07-1)collectedintheSanJavier-LaBarrancaregion(Figures1and2)(UTM12R:634347E,3167294N)yieldedProterozoic grains (~60%) with age peaks near 1.7, 1.6, 1.4 and 1.1 Ga, the largest peak at 1.4 Ga. 33% of the grains are TriassicandPermianwithagesbetween288and239Maandapeakat250-254Ma.Threegrains(althoughtwoofthemarediscordant)haveagesbetween~465and~300Maandtwootherswithagesbetween2.8and2.6Ga(Figure3b).Onequartzarenitic,coarse-grainedsandstonefromtheSantaClaraFormationcollectedinthelocalityofminaLaLourdesarea(UTM12R:549022E,3163600N;MontijoContreras,2007)yieldedzircongrainswithagesbetween297 and 205 Ma (50% of the grains) with peak ages at 269, 245and231Ma,andProterozoicgrainswithapeakat1.1Gaandsubordinatepeakagesat1.7and1.4Ga(Figure3b).Onepebble-sandstonesamplefromtheCoyotesFormation(sample7-28-07-1)collectedabout2.5kmsouthofthetownofSanJavier(Figure1),alongthemainroad(UTM12R:622512E,3162331N),yieldedonlyProterozoicgrainsintwo populations with peak ages near 1.4 Ga (~60% of the grains) and 1.6 Ga (~30% of the grains) (Figure 3b).
Asandstonesample(WL01405Z)collectedfromthe
Figure3.AgeprobabilitydiagramsforTriassicandJurassicsamples.a:samplesfromtheAntimonio,RíoAsunciónandSierradeSantaRosaforma-tionsoftheElAntimonioGroup,includingsample2000-2(thick,grayline)fromthemiddlememberoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormationreportedinGonzález-Leónet al.(2005).b:SamplesfromtheArrayanes,SantaClaraandCoyotesFormationsoftheBarrancaGroup.c)SamplesfromtheBasomariandLilyFormations.
Lower Mesozoic detrital zircon geochronology of Sonora, México 307
207Pb/235U
206 P
b/23
8 U20
6 Pb/
238 U
206 P
b/23
8 U
207Pb/235U
ARRAYANES
SANTA CLARA
COYOTES
0 4 8 12 16 20
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
0
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
ANTIMONIO
RIO ASUNCION
SANTA ROSA
0 4 8 12 16 20
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
a)
b)
LILY 1
LILY 2
BASOMARI
4 8 12 16 20
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
0
3000
2600
2200
1800
1400
1000
c)
207Pb/235U
lowerpartoftheBasomariFormation(Figure2)yieldedEarly Jurassic grains (17%) with a major peak age near 190 Ma, Triassic and Permian grains (13%) with peaks near 243–257 Ma, Paleozoic and Neoproterozoic grains (20%) withagesbetween645to310Ma,andProterozoicgrains(~50%) with peaks near 1.7, 1.4, 1.1 and 1.0 Ga (Figure 3c). ZirconsfromtwodifferentsandstonesamplesoftheLilyFormation collected from the southwestern flank of Sierra Copercuin(sampleLily1locatedatUTM12R622131E,3361530N;andsampleLily2at621809E;3362217N)yieldedamaximumlateMiddleJurassicageforthisunit.Both samples yielded Jurassic zircons (25–43% of the total grains)withagesbetween195and160Maandpeakages~164and160Ma,respectively,TriassicandPermiangrainswith ages between 300 and 200 Ma (<10% of the grains) thatshowsubordinateconcentrationofagesat214and217Ma, Paleozoic and Neoproterozoic grains (11–22% of the grains)withagesbetween954and385Maandconcentra-tionsat590–547and412–422Ma,andProterozoicgrains(27% of the grains) with concentration of ages near 1.8, 1.4 and1.0-1.2Ga(Figure3c).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Zircon populations
ThenewdetritalzircongeochronologydatareportedhereinfromninesamplesofTriassicandLowerandMiddleJurassicstratapermitnewinferencesregardingtheearlyMesozoicprovenanceandpaleogeographyofSonora.ThesedataalsoprovideamaximumEarlyTriassic(IUGS-ICSchart,2007)depositionalageforthepreviouslyundatedArrayanesFormation,whichaccordingtoitsyoungerzirconpeakageitmustbeyoungerthanabout250Ma.ThisdataalsoindicatethattheArrayanesmaybeaboutthesameageastheAntimonioFormation,asbothunitsshareacommondetritalzirconpeakageat~254Ma.Ontheotherhand,allofthezirconsanalyzedfromtheCoyotesFormationareProterozoic,andthusinconclusivewithregardtoitsinferredEarlyJurassicage.Thezirconpopulationofthissamplemaybebiasedtoolderagebecauseitcontainsabundantquartzarenitepebblesrecycledfromolderstrata.
Thefollowingdistinctivezirconpopulationsidenti-fied in the analyzed samples are described and discussed according to their decreasing abundance. The first popu-lation(Figure3d)belongstoProterozoiczirconswhoseabundance varies between 30 and 100% in the analyzed samples,andhaspeakagesaround1.8,1.7,1.6,1.4,and1.1Ga.ProterozoiczirconsaremoreabundantintheTriassicsamples where they compose 50–90% of the analyzed grains butdecreaseintheJurassicsampleswheretheycompose30–50 % of the analyzed grains. The exception to this trend istheCoyotesFormationwhich,asnoted,maybebiasedbytheabundanceofquarzareniteclaststhatarerecycledfromProterozoicand/orPaleozoicsedimentaryunitsin
Figure4.U-Pbconcordiaplotsfordetritalzirconsfrom(a)ElAntimonioGroup,(b)BarrancaGroup,and(c)BasomariandLilyformations.Errorsareshownatthe2-sigmalevel.
González-León et al.308
Sonora,whichhavesimilardetrital-zirconagepopulations(GehrelsandStewart,1998;Stewartet al.,2002)tothisunit.ProterozoicgrainsintheElAntimonioGroupsampleshavedominantpeakagesnear1.7,1.4and1.1Ga,whereasthoseoftheBarrancaGrouphaveadominantpeakagenear1.4Gaandsubordinatepeaksat~1.7and1.1Ga.TheJurassicBasomariandLilyformationshavedispersedProterozoicpeaksnear1.8,1.7,1.2,and1.0Ga.
AseconddistinctiveagepopulationconsistsofPermian and Triassic zircons that make up between 8% and 50% of the analyzed samples. This population is prominent intheTriassicformationsanditsabundancedecreasesintheJurassicformations.ThePermo-TriassicgrainsaremoreabundantintheBarrancaGroup,inwhichtheycomposeup to 50% of the analyzed grains, than in the El Antimonio Group in which they compose no more than 22% of the analyzedgrains.PermiangrainsdominateovertheTriassicgrainsintheArrayanesandSantaClarasamples,andarelargelyabsentfromtheformationsoftheElAntimonioGroupexceptforuncommongrains in theAntimonioFormation.TriassicgrainsintheElAntimonioGroupin-crease in abundance upsection from 3% in the Antimonio Formation, 10% in the Río Asunción Formation and 22% inthelowerpartoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormation,butarenotpresentintheMiddleMemberoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormation(sample2000-2inGonzález-Leónet al.,2005;Figure3a).ThePermo-TriassicgrainsintheBasomari Formation make up nearly 13% of the analyzed grains,butTriassicgrainsarescarce.Thissamepopulationcomposes about 10% of the total analyzed grains in the LilyFormation.
ThePermo-TriassiczircongrainsoftheBarrancaGrouphavepeakagesnear284,269,254,~246and231Ma,peakagesnear254,239,234and227MaintheElAntimonioGroup,andpeakagesnear257–243MaintheBasomariFormation.Aminorpeakageat~217MaispresentintheLilyFormation(Figure3).
ThethirdzirconpopulationofEarlyJurassicageispresentinthemiddlememberoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormationandintheBasomariFormation.Themid-dlememberoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormationhasaprominent Jurassic age population (55%) with a peak age near190Ma,similartotheBasomariFormationthathasa population (17%) with a peak age at 190 Ma (Figure 3). It is also present, but subordinate (<10%), in the Lily Formation and was not identified in the lower part of the SierradeSantaRosaFormation(sample4-5-08-1),whereabiostratigraphiclateSinemurianageisthesameasthegeochronologicage(189.2±1.1Ma)ofatuffintheup-perpartoftheBasomariFormation(Leggettet al.,2007;Figure2).ThefourthpopulationisonlypresentintheLilyFormationandconsistsofMiddleJurassiczirconswithagepeaksat168(sampleLily1,Figure3)and162Ma(sampleLily 2, Figure 3) and has an abundance of ~30% of the total analyzedgrains.
A fifth population that consists of Neoproterozoic and
PaleozoiczircongrainsispresentintheBasomariandLilyformations.ThePaleozoicgrainsareSilurianandDevonianin age and compose ~13% of the analyzed grains in the Basomari Formation and ~10% of the grains in the Lily Formation.TheBasomarihaspeakagesat433–378MaandtheLilyshowsconcentrationsofagesat422–412Ma.The Neoproterozoic zircons compose up to 10% in the Lily Formation,inwhichtheyshowconcentrationsat590–547Ma and they compose ~6% in the Basomari Formation, inwhichtheyshowasubordinatepeakat612Ma(notindicatedinFigure3c).Veryscarcegrainswithscatteredagesbetween~400and~1000MaoccurintheArrayanes(n=1),SantaClara(n=2),Asunción(n=1)andAntimonioformations(n=6).AsmanyasthreegrainswithArcheanagesbetween2.8and2.6GaarepresentineachoftheLily,ArrayanesandtheAntimonioformations.
Provenance
TheprominentpopulationofdetritalzirconswithProterozoicageswithpeaksnear1.7,1.6,1.4,and1.1GawasprobablyderivedfromProterozoicigneousandmeta-morphicbasementofthesouthwesternUSAandSonora.ThisbasementincludestheYavapaiandMazatzalprovincesand~1.1and~1.4Gagraniticplutonsthatintrudethem(seereferencescitedabove).ThegrainsalsomayhavebeenrecycledfromNeoproterozoicandPaleozoicsandstonesthatcontainsimilargrain-agepopulations(referencescitedabove).Thenearabsenceof1.8Gazirconsthatcouldreflect provenance of the Mojave province, however, is noteworthy;uncommongrainsofthatageoccuronlyintheSantaClaraandLilyformations.Thiscouldindicatethat theProterozoicgrainsweremostlyrecycledfromNeoproterozoicandPaleozoicsedimentaryrocksofSonoraandthesouthwesternUSA,inwhichgrainsolderthan~1.7Gaarenearlyabsent(GehrelsandStewart,1998;Grosset al.,2000;Stewartet al.,2001).
PossiblesourceareasforthePermo-TriassiczirconpopulationintheBarrancaandElAntimoniogroupsaremorecontroversialanduncertain,buttheyincludethemost-lyTriassicmagmaticarcoftheMojaveDesertinCalifornia(BarthandWooden,2006)andthePermo-TriassicarcofnorthernMexico(Torreset al.,1999).ThesecondregionwasconsideredbyGehrelsandStewart(1998)tohavebeenthesourceofPermo-TriassicdetritalzirconsintheBarrancaGroup and the first region was considered by González-Leónet al.(2005)asasourceareafortheElAntimoniostratazircons.Permo-TriassicrocksoftheMojaveDesertaregraniticplutonsthatrangeinagefrom~210Mato~260Ma(Barthet al.,1990,Milleret al.,1995,Barthet al.,1997,Barthet al.,2001;Walkeret al.,2002;BarthandWooden,2006),whereasthePermo-TriassicmagmaticarcofnorthernMexicointhenearbystatesofChihuahuaandCoahuilaincludesmostlygraniticintrusivesandrhyoliticrockswithagesbetween270to220Ma(thepublished
Lower Mesozoic detrital zircon geochronology of Sonora, México 309
dataarepresentedinTable1,whilefourotherK/Aragesbetween~266and~250MaofgraniticintrusivesfromthatregionwerereportedbyTorreset al.,1999,astakenfromPEMEXinternalreports).Inaddition,graniticclastswithintheSanMarcosFormationinnorth-centralMexicoaredatedbetween225and213Maandwereprobablyderivedfromthatarc(inMcKeeet al.,1990,McKeeet al.,1999).ThePermo-TriassiczirconpopulationfromtheBarrancaandElAntimoniogroupshaspeakagesnear269,~250,~240,~234and227Ma,someofwhicharecommontobothgroups.TheJurassicBasomariandLilyformationsshowclosesimilarpeakagesat257,243,and~217Ma.
UpperTriassicstratainthewesterninteriorUSA,forexampletheChinleFormationinArizonaandequivalentOsobbFormationinNevada,andDockumGroupandSantaRosaFormationinNewMexicoandTexas,respectively,yieldsimilarPermo-Triassicpopulationsofdetritalzircons(GehrelsandDickinson;1995;Riggset al.,1996;Foxet al.,2005;Foxet al.,2006).TheChinleandDockumgroupsinNewMexicoandTexashaveagepeaksat280–220Ma(FoxandLehman,2005)and295–225Ma(Foxet al.,2006);thesourcesofdetritusinthesestratahavebeeninterpretedasthemagmaticarcofnortheasternMexicoandtheCordilleranmagmaticarcinsouthwesternUSA.Similarly,TriassicdetritalzirconpopulationsintheLateTriassicformationsoftheLuningandPineNutassemblagesofsouthernNevadayieldzirconswithagesbetween243and218Maandpeakprobabilityagesat231Maand223Ma(Manuszaket al.,2000),whoseprovenancewasassignedtoarc-typerelatedmagmatismoftheSierra-KlamathregioninsouthwesternUSA(Manuszaket al.,2000).
TheEarlyJurassiczirconpopulation(agepeaknear190Ma)iswellrepresentedintheBasomariandmiddlememberoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormation(Figure3a
and3c).ThispopulationispoorlyrepresentedintheLilyFormationandisabsentfromthelowermostpartoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormation(sample4-5-08-1).ThispopulationprobablyrecordstheinceptionoftheJurassiccontinentalmagmaticarcofsouthwesternNorthAmerica,whoseoldest,althoughscarce, igneousrecordoccursinsouthernArizonaandintheMojaveDesertregions(Asmeromet al.,1990;RiggsandBusby-Spera,1990;Riggset al.,1993;Milleret al.,1995).TheMiddleJurassiczirconpopulationisabundantintheLilyFormationandisalsoconsideredtobederivedfromtheJurassicconti-nentalmagmaticarc,whichbyMiddleJurassictimewaswelldevelopedinsouthwesternUSAandnorthernSonora(Andersonet al.,2005).
TheNeoproteozoicandPaleozoiczirconpopulationrepresentedintheBasomariandLilyformationsisnearlyabsentinformationsoftheElAntimonioandBarrancagroups.ZirconsoftheseageswereprobablytransportedbywindintotheJurassicmagmaticarc(Riggset al.,1993)ofSonora from Jurassic eolian sand fields in Arizona (Wingate, NavajoandEntradasandstones),wheregrainsofpopula-tionBofDickinsonandGehrels(2003),withanagerangebetween747and309Ma,arewellrepresented.TheLilyFormation records fluvial, alluvial and lacustrine deposition concomitantwithrhyoliticvolcanismoftheCordilleranvolcanic arc, but the fluvial quartz-rich beds likely record reworkingofeoliandeposits.JurassiceolianitedepositswithinthisarcarepresentinnorthernSonorawithintheRanchoSanMartinFormation(whoseyoungestdetritalzirconshaveagesnear169±6Ma;Leggettet al.,2005),intheElenitaFormation(Valentine,1936)nearCananeaandinotherlocalitieslikeSierraSanAntonio,eastofNogales(C.G-L.unpublisheddata),andatPlanchasdePlata,westofNogales(RiggsandBusby-Spera,1991).
Locality Rock Age (Ma) Reference
SanMarcos(Ch) GneissclastinSMF 230±3(Rb/Sr) McKeeet al.(1990)Aldama(Ch) Granite 250±20(K/Ar) inTorreset al.(1999)Carrizalillo(Ch) Granite 267±21(K/Ar) inTorreset al.(1999)Plomosas(Ch) Rhyolite 270±30 (Pb-α) deCsernaet al.(1970)SierraMojada(Co) QmdclastinSMF 213±14(Rb/Sr) McKeeet al.(1990)SierraMojada(Co) QmdclastinSMF 215±2(U/Pb) inMcKeeet al.(1999)S.LosRemedios(Co) Tonalite 216(Ar/Ar) MolinaGarza(2005)
ca.220(U/Pb) Joneset al.,1995(inMolinaGarza,2005)ElCoyote(Co) Granodiorite 220±4(U/Pb) inMcKeeet al.(1999)PozoMayran1(Co) Rhyolite 222±2(Rb/Sr) inGrajales-Nishimuraet al.(1992)SierraMojada(Co) QmdclastinSMF 225±4(Rb/Sr) McKeeet al.(1990)PozoPaila1(Co) Ignimbrite 236±39(Rb/Sr) inGrajales-Nishimuraet al.(1992)PotreroMula(Co) Granite 238±2(U/Pb) inMcKeeet al.(1999)LasDelicias(Co) Granodiorite 256±20(K/Ar) inTorreset al.(1999)LasDelicias(Co) DaciteclastinLDF 268±6(U/Pb) inMcKeeet al.(1999)PozoTarahumara(Co) Andesite 272±22(?) Morenoet al.(2000)
Ch:Chihuahua,Co:Coahuila,Za:Zacatecas,Ta:Tamaulipas,SMF:SanMarcosFormation(LowerCretaceous),Qmd:Quartzmonzodiorite,LDF:LasDeliciasFormation(UpperPermianinMolina-Garza,2005).
Table1.PermianandTriassicigneousrocksreportedfromnorthernMexico.
González-León et al.310
29° 00’
Gu l f
o f
Ca l i f o r n i a
CucurpeCaborca
Alamos
Antimoniopaleobay
S O N O R A
Outcrop and inferred extension of the fluvial, deltaicand marginal marine strata of the Barranca Group
Outcrops and inferred extension of marine depositionof the Triassic and Lower Jurassic El Antimonio Group
Bivalves and ammonites in Triassic marine strata
Proposed trace for the Mojave-Sonora megashear
Speculative Triassic drainage systemfor the Barranca Group
Fossil plants and coal in Triassic strata
100 km
USA
Pacific Ocean
Gul
fofM
exic
o
MEXICO
Sonora
ColoradoPlateau
MS m
A R I Z O N A
Permo-TriassicCordilleranmagmatic
arc
Permo-Triassicmagmatic arcof northern
Mexico
MS m
San Marcialbasin
HERMOSILLO
27° 00’
31° 00’
113° 00’ 111° 00’
Figure5.InferredpaleogeographyofSonoraduringTriassicandEarlyJurassictimeifdisplacementbytheMojave-Sonoramegashearisnotsupported.ArrowsininsetmapindicateinferredprovenancefordetritalzirconsintheTriassicandJurassicformationsofSonora,asdiscussedinthemanuscript.
Detrital zircon ages and paleogeography
Alencáster (1961a) first proposed that the Barranca GroupincentralSonorawasdepositedintheSanMarcialbasinthatconnectedtothenorthwestwiththeElAntimoniopaleo-bay(“paleobahíadelAntimonio”),wheretheElAntimonioGroupwasdeposited(Figure5).StewartandRoldán-Quintana(1991)proposedthatdepositionoftheBarrancaGroupoccurredbylargefluvialsystemsinariftbasinadjacenttohigh-reliefupliftsincentralSonora.Stewartet al.(1997)alsoproposedthattheembaymentcon-nectionbetweentheSanMarcialbasinandElAntimoniopaleo-baywasrecordedbytheUpperTriassic–LowerJurassic(?)successionoftheSierraSantaTeresa(Figures1and5)thatlithologicallyresemblesstrataoftheBarrancaGroupandcontainsstrataandfossilsofsequenceVIIoftheRíoAsunciónFormation(Goodwin,1999).BasedonnewlydescribedsectionsoftheBarrancaGroupincentralSonoraandoncorrelationwiththeElAntimoniostrata,Montijo-Contreras(2007)proposedthatstrataoftheBarranca Group were deposited in a large fluvio-deltaic and shallowmarinesettingthatgradedsouthwardandwestwardintoopenmarineenvironments(Figure5).Previously,StanleyandGonzález-León(1995)consideredthattheElAntimoniosuccessionwasdepositedadjacenttosouthernCalifornia,intheUSA,laterthrustedoveritsCordilleranmiogeoclinalbasementoftheCaborcablock,andsubse-
quentlytranslatedsoutheastwardtoitspresentpositionbytheMojave-SonoramegashearinMiddleJurassictime(SilverandAnderson,1974;AndersonandSilver,2005).StanleyandGonzález-León(1995)alsosuggestedthattheElAntimoniostrataweredepositedcloseto,andcorrelatedwithTriassicstrataof,southwesternUSA,liketheLuningFormationofNevada,basedonpaleontologicsimilarities.Otherauthors,basedonpaleontologicandlithologiccriteriaalsocorrelatedtheTriassicstratabetweenthesetworegions(Lucaset al.,1997;BlodgettandFrýda,2001;González-Leónet al.,2005;MarzolfandAnderson,2005;BlodgettandStanley,2006;Scholzet al.,2008).
FollowingtheMojave-Sonoramegashearhypothesis,theElAntimonioandBarrancagroupsarelocatedsouthofthetraceofthisfault,whiletheLowerandMiddleJurassicBasomariandLilyformations[alongwithotherunitsinnorthernSonoraliketheRanchoSanMartin(Leggettet al.,2005)andtheElenitaformations(Valentine,1936)]that record fluvial and eolian deposition associated with silicicmagmatismoftheNorthAmericaJurassicvolcanicarcarelocatednorthofthefault(Figure5).Alternatively,iftheMojave-Sonoramegasheardidnotexist,theBarrancaandElAntimoniogroupsrecordmarginalmarinetodistalmarinefaciesofabasinthatdevelopedclosetoitspresentposition,southofwheretheJurassicarcdeveloped(Lucaset al.,1999),althoughtectonicaccretionoftheElAntimoniostrataduringMiddletoLateJurassictimeissuggestedby
Lower Mesozoic detrital zircon geochronology of Sonora, México 311
paleomagneticdata(Molina-GarzaandGeissman,1996;1999).
DetritalzircondatareportedhereindicatethattheTriassicandLowerJurassicbasinsofSonorawerefedabundantlywithdetritusderivedfromexposedProterozoicbasementand/orfromtheNeoproterozoicandPaleozoicstratasuccessionofSonoraandsouthwesternUSA.Thepresentgeographicdistributionofthesebasementprov-inces,indicatethatthesedimentsourceareaswerelocatedtothenorthofthebasins,aninferencealsosupportedbypredominantlySW-directedpaleocurrentdirectionsavail-ableonlyfortheBarrancaGroup(StewartandRoldán-Quintana,1991).Ifa12to50ºJurassicclockwiserotationoftheCaborcablock(Molina-GarzaandGeissman,1996;1999;MolinaGarzaandIriondo,2005)isrestored,paleo-currentsindicatethatthelargeriversystemthatdepositedthe Barranca Group would have flowed southward into theSanMarcialbasin.Also,ifmarginalmarinetoshallowmarinedepositiononapassivemarginisconsideredfortheTriassicformationsofSonora(González-Leónet al.,2005),then the San Marcial fluvial system was contemporaneous with a large fluvial system that fed the Potosí submarine fan incentralMexico(Centeno-García,2005).Bothofthesefluvial systems drained interior North America. However, thepassivemarginmodeliscontradictedbyevidenceforthedevelopmentofanearbyTriassiccontinentalmagmaticarcinsoutheasternCaliforniaandsouthwesternArizona(BarthandWooden,2006)thatextendedintonorthwest-ernSonora,asindicatedbythepresenceofa~233Ma(U/Pb)granite inSierraLosTanques innorthwesternSonora(Figure1;CampbellandAnderson,2003).Indeed,conglomerateandsandstoneoftheElAntimonioGroup’sTriassicformationscontainabundant igneousdetritus(González-Leónet al.,2005)thatmaybederivedfromtheactiveTriassicarc.
Accordingtodifferencesinsandstonepetrography,conglomerateclastcompositionandPermianzirconsoftheBarrancaandElAntimoniogroups,differentsourceareasforsedimentsofthetwosuccessionsarepossible.Commonigneousgrainsandclasts influvial toshallowmarinesandstoneandconglomerateoftheElAntimonioGroupformations(González-Leónet al.,2005)areabsentfromtheBarrancaGroup,wheresandstonecompositionrangesfromsubarkosictoquartz-richandclastsintheconglomeratebedsareexclusivelyquartzarenite,chertandquartz(StewartandRoldán-Quintana,1991;CojanandPotter,1991).Similarly,PermiandetritalzirconsthatareabundantintheBarrancaGroup formations (up to 23% of the total grains) are absent intheElAntimonioGroupformations,althoughTriassicgrainsinbothgroupsoccurinsimilarproportions.ThePermiandetritalzirconsintheBarrancaGroupmorecloselyresembleagesofthecontinentalmagmaticarcofnorthernMexico,wherePermianages(Table1)areolderthanintheMojavearc.Forthisreason,thePermian-Triassicmag-maticarcofnorthernMexicoisconsideredastheprobablesourceareafortheBarrancaPermianzircons.TheTriassic
zirconpopulationoftheElAntimonioandBarrancagroupshowever,couldhavebeenderivedfromeitherthenorthernMexicoortheCalifornia-Arizonamagmaticarcs,whoselatestPermian-Triassicagesoverlap.Althoughbotharcsareconsideredseparateentitiesbecauseigneousrocksof Permian and Triassic ages have not been identified in northernSonoraandsouthernArizona,itcouldhavebeenacontinuousarcthatwasobliteratedbyyoungereventslikethedevelopmentoftheJurassicmagmaticarc,orbecauseitiscoveredbyyoungerrocks,orsimplybecauseitsrockshavenotyetbeendated.
Theinformationprovidedbythenewdetritalzircondata,however,donotconclusivelysupportorrejectleft-lateraldisplacementoftheTriassic-LowerJurassicforma-tionsoftheBarrancaandElAntimoniogroups,eitherbytheMiddleJurassicMojave-Sonoramegashear(AndersonandSilver,2005)orthePermian-TriassicCalifornia-Coahuilatransformfault(DickinsonandLawton,2001),bothmodelsrequiringsoutheastwarddisplacementoftheCaborcablockbynearly1,000km.However,strikingdifferencesinzirconpopulationsarepresentintheLowerJurassicformationslocatedonoppositesidesoftheproposedfaults.WhiletheLowerJurassicBasomariFormationlocatedtothenorthof the Mojave-Sonora megashear contains a significant PaleozoicandNeoproterozoicdetritalzirconpopulationthatisalsopresentintheMiddleJurassicLilyFormation,thatpopulationisnotpresentintheLowerJurassicSierradeSantaRosaFormationlocatedtothesouthoftheinferredstrike-slipfault.IftheNeoproterozoicandearlyPaleozoicagepopulationrecordseoliantransportintotheJurassicarcofnorthernSonorafromsandseasintheColoradoPlateauashereininferred,thesesandsdidnotreachtheElAntimoniopaleo-bay,possiblybecauseofaninterveninggeographicbarrierorbecausethemarinefaciesweredepositedoffshore,far from the influence of those wind systems. In addition, theEarlyJurassiczirconpopulation(peakat~190Ma)thatispresentinthelowerpartoftheBasomariFormationandMiddleMember(lowerPliensbachian)oftheSierradeSantaRosaFormationisnotpresentinthelowerstrataoftheSierradeSantaRosaFormation(sample4-5-08-1,lateSinemurian),whichcouldindicatethatJurassicmagmaticdetritusdidnotreachthebasinbythattime,butratherar-rivedsomewhatlaterduringdepositionofthemiddlepartoftheformation.
FurtherevidencethatmayindicatetheElAntimonioandBarrancagroupswerenotdisplacedbytheMojave-SonoramegashearcomesfromtheBasomariFormation.Thisunitislocated40kmnorthoftheproposedtraceofthisfaultandU-PbagesandNdisotopicvaluesobtainedform its granitic clasts indicate they share affinity with the basementoftheCaborcablock(Amatoet al.,2009).TheageandcompositionoftheseProterozoicclastssuggestedtoAmatoet al.(2009)thattheCaborcablockmusthavebeenlocatedclosetotheBasomaribasininSonorabyEarlyJurassictime,alocationnotpredictedbythepreviousmodel(SilverandAnderson,1974;AndersonandSilver,
González-León et al.312
2005)postulatingMiddleJurassicdisplacementalongtheMojave-Sonoramegashear.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
González-LeónacknowledgesinternalsupportfromInstitutodeGeología,UNAM,andIndustriasPeñoles,S.A.thatfundedforgeochronologyanalysisofsamplesfromtheLilyFormation.ThisstudywaspartiallysupportedbyNSFEAR-0229565toLawtonandAmato.AZLaserChronispartiallysupportedbyNSF-EAR0443387and0732436.WeappreciatecriticalreviewsbyNancyRiggs,AlexanderIriondoandEditorSusanaAlanizthatgreatlyimprovedthemanuscript.
APPENDIX A. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
TableA1canbefoundatthejournalwebsite<http://satori.geociencias.unam.mx/>,inthetableofcontentsofthisissue(electronicsupplement26-2-01).
REFERENCES
Alencáster,G.,1961a,EstratigrafíadelTriásicoSuperiordelapartecentraldelEstadodeSonora,inAlencáster,G.(ed.),PaleontologíadelTriásicoSuperiordeSonora:UniversidadNacionalAutónomadeMéxico,InstitutodeGeología,PaleontologíaMexicana,11,1-18.
Alencáster,G.,1961b,FaunafósildelaFormaciónSantaClara(Cárnico)delEstadodeSonora,inAlencáster,G.(ed.),PaleontologíadelTriásicoSuperiordeSonora:UniversidadNacionalAutónomadeMéxico,InstitutodeGeología,PaleontologíaMexicana,11,19-45.
Amato,J.M.,Boullion,A.O.,Serna,A.M.,Sanders,A.E.,Farmer,L.E.,Gehrels,G.E.,Wooden,J.L.,2008a,EvolutionofMazatzalprov-inceandthetimingoftheMazatzalorogeny:insightsfromU-PbgeochronologyandgeochemistryofigneousandmetasedimentaryrocksinsouthernNewMexico:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,120,328-346.
Amato,J.,Lawton,T.,Leggett,W.,Mauel,D.,Gonzalez-León,C.,Heizler,M.,Farmer,G.L.,2008b,CaborcanProterozoicbasementintheranchoLaLaminaregion,Sonora,Mexico:U-Pbages,Ndisotopiccomposition,40Ar/39Arthermochronology,andclastprovenanceindicatepre-EarlyJurassicarrivalandLaramideexhumation(abstract),inCordilleranSection(104thAnnual)andRockyMountainSection(60thAnnual)JointMeeting,19–21March2008:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,AbstractswithProgram,40(1),48.
Amato,J.M.,Lawton,T.F.,Mauel,D.,Leggett,González-León,C.M.,W.,Farmer,G.L.,Wooden,J.L.,2009,TestingtheMojave-Sonoramegashearhypothesis:EvidencefromPaleoproterozoicigneousrocksanddeformedMesozoicstratainSonora,Mexico:Geology37(1),75-78;doi:10.1130/G25240A.1.
Anderson,T.H.,Silver,L.T.,1981,AnoverviewofPrecambrianrocksinSonora:UniversidadNacionalAutónomadeMéxico,RevistadelInstitutodeGeología,5(2),131-139.
Anderson, T.H., Silver, L.T., 2005, The Mojave-Sonora megashear –field andanalyticalstudiesleadingtotheconceptionandevolutionofthehypothesis,inAnderson,T.H.,Nourse,J.A.,McKee,J.W.,Steiner,M.B.(eds.),TheMojave-SonoraMegashearHypothesis:development,assessmentandalternatives:GeologicalSocietyof
America,SpecialPaper393,1-50.doi:10.1130/2005.2393(02).Anderson,T.H.,Rodríguez-Castañeda,J.L.,Silver,L.,2005,JurassicRocks
inSonora,Mexico:relationstotheMojave-Sonoramegashearanditsinferrednorthwestwardextensión,inAnderson,T.H.,Nourse,J.A.,McKee,J.W.,Steiner,M.B.(eds.),TheMojave-SonoraMegashearHypothesis:development,assessmentandalternatives:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper393,51-95.
Asmerom, Y., Zartman, R.E., Damon, P.E., Shafiqullah, M., 1990, Zircon U-Th-Pbandwhole-rockR-SragepatternsoflowerMesozoicigneousrocksintheSantaRitaMountains,southeasternArizona:implicationsforMesozoicmagmatismandtectonicsinsouth-ernCordillera:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,102,961-968.
Barth,A.P.,Wooden,J.L.,2006,Timingofmagmatismfollowingintialconvergenceatapassivemargin,southwesternU.S.Cordillera,andagesoflowercrustalmagmasources:TheJournalofGeology,114,231-245.
Barth,A.P.,Tosdal,R.M.,Wooden,J.L.,1990,ApetrologiccomparisonofTriassicplutonismintheSanGabrielandMuleMountains,southernCalifornia:JournalofGeophysicalResearch,95,20075-20096.
Barth,A.P.,Tosdal,R.M.,Wooden,J.L.,Howard,K.A.,1997,Triassicplu-tonisminsouthernCalifornia:southwardyoungingofarcintiationalongatruncatedcontinentalmargin:Tectonics,16,290-304.
Barth,A.P., Jacobson,C.E.,Coleman,D.S.,Wooden, J.L., 2001,ConstructionandtectonicevolutionofCordillerancontinentalcrust:examplesfromtheSanGabrielandSanBernardinoMountains,inDunne,G.,Cooper,J.(comp.),GeologicExcursionsin theCaliforniaDesertsandAdjacentTransverseRanges:Fullerton, CA, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Pacific Section,Book88,17-53.
Blodgett,R.B.,Frýda,J.,2001,UpperTriassicgastropodbiogeographyofwesternNorthAmerica(abstract), inGeologicalSocietyofAmerica,CordilleranSection,97thAnnualMeeting,andAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists, Pacific Section: GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,AbstractswithPrograms,33(3),A-53.
Blodgett,R.B.,Stanley,G.D.,2006,LateTriassicgastropodsfaunasofwesternNorthAmerica–ausefultoolinterraneanalysis(abstract),in102ndAnnualMeetingoftheCordilleranSection,GeologicalSociety of America; 81st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Section, AmericanAssociationofPetroleumGeologists,andtheWesternRegionalMeetingoftheAlaskaSection:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,AbstractwithPrograms,38(5),81.
Campbell,P.A.,Anderson,T.H.,2003,Structureandkinematicsalongaseg-mentoftheMojave-Sonoramegashear:astrike-slipfaultthattrun-catestheJurassiccontinentalmagmaticarcofsouthwesternNorthAmerica:Tectonics,22(6),1077,doi:10.1029/2002TC1367.
Centeno-García,E.,2005,ReviewofUpperPaleozoicandLowerMesozoicstratigraphyanddepositionalenvironmentsofcentralandwestMexico:constraintsonterraneanalysisandpaleogeography,inAnderson,T.H.,Nourse,J.A.,McKee,J.W.Steiner,M.B.(eds.),TheMojave-SonoraMegashearHypothesis:development,assess-mentandalternatives:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper393,233-258.
Cojan,I.,Potter,P.E.,1991,Depositionalenvironments,petrology,andprovenanceoftheSantaClaraFormation,UpperTriassicBarrancaGroup,easternSonora,Mexico,inPérez-Segura,E.,Jacques-Ayala,C.(eds.),StudiesinSonoranGeology:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper254,37-50.
DeCserna,Z.,Rincón-Orta,C.,Solorio-Munguía,J.,Schmitter-Villada,E.,1970,UnaedadradiométricapérmicatempranadelaregióndePlacerdeGuadalupe,norestedeChihuahua:BoletínSociedadGeológicaMexicana,31,65-73.
Dickinson,W.R.,Gehrels,G.E.,2003,U–PbagesofdetritalzirconsfromPermianandJurassiceoliansandstonesoftheColoradoPlateau,USA:paleogeographicimplications:SedimentaryGeology,163,29–66.
Dickinson,W.R.,Lawton,T.F.,2001,CarboniferoustoCretaceousassem-
Lower Mesozoic detrital zircon geochronology of Sonora, México 313
blyandfragmentationofMexico:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,113,1142–1160.
Farmer,G.L.,Bowring,S.A.,Matzel,J.,Espinosa-Maldonado,G.,Fedo,C.,Wooden,J.,2005,PaleoproterozoicMojaveprovinceinnorthwesternMexico?IsotopicandU-Pbzircongeochrono-logicstudiesofPrecambrianandCambriancrystallineandsedimentaryrocks,Caborca,Sonora,inAnderson,T.H.,Nourse,J.A.,McKee,J.W.Steiner,M.B.(eds.),TheMojave-SonoraMegashearHypothesis:development,assessmentandalterna-tives:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper393,259-282.doi:10.1130/2005.2393(5).
Fox,J.,Stair,K.N.,Lehman,T.M.,2005,DetritalzirconsinUpperTriassicstrataoftheUpperChinleandDockumGroups,NewMexicoandTexas(abstract),in101stAnnualMeetingoftheCordilleranSection,GeologicalSocietyofAmerica:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,AbstractwithPrograms,38(5),10.
Fox,J.D.,Anderson,C.,Stair,K.,Dickinson,W.R.,2006,ProvenancecontrastsrevealedbyU-PbagepopulationsofdetritalzirconsinChinlesandstonesofthefourcornersregion,southwestUS(abstract),in102ndAnnualMeetingoftheCordilleranSection,Geological Society of America; 81st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Section,AmericanAssociationofPetroleumGeologists,andtheWesternRegionalMeetingoftheAlaskaSection:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,AbstractswithPrograms,37(4),46.
Gehrels,G.E.,2000,IntroductiontodetritalzirconstudiesofPaleozoicandTriassicstratainwesternNevadaandnorthernCalifornia,inSoreghan,M.J.,Gehrels,G.E.(eds.),PaleozoicandTriassicPaleogeographyandTectonicsofWesternNevadaandNorthernCalifornia:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper347,1-17.
Gehrels,G.E.,Dickinson,W.R.,1995,DetritalzirconprovenanceofCambriantoTriassicmiogeoclinalandeugeoclinalstratainNevada:AmericanJournalofScience,295,18-48.
Gehrels,G.E.,Stewart,J.H.,1998,DetritalzirconU-PbgeochronologyofCambriantoTriassicmiogeoclinalstrataofSonora,Mexico:JournalofGeophysicalResearch,103,2741-2487.
Gehrels,G.,Valencia,V.,Pullen,A.,2006,DetritalZirconGeochronologybyLaserAblationMulticollectorICPMSattheArizonaLaserChronCenter, inOlszewski,T. (ed.),Geochronology:EmergingOpportunities:PaleontologySocietyPapers,2,67-76.
Gehrels,G.E.,Valencia,V.A.,Ruiz,J.,2008,Enhancedprecision,ac-curacy, efficiency, and spatial resolution of U-Pb ages by laser ablationmulticollectorinductivelycoupledplasmamassspec-trometry:GeochemicalGeophysicalGeosystems,9,Q03017,doi:10.1029/2007GC001805.
González-León,C.,1997,Sequencestratigraphyandpaleogeographicset-tingoftheAntimonioFormation(LatePermian-EarlyJurassic),Sonora,Mexico:RevistaMexicanadeCienciasGeológicas,14(2),136-148.
González-León,C.,Stanley,G.D.,Gehrels,G.E.,Centeno-García,E.,2005,Newdataonthelithostratigraphy,detritalzirconandNdisotopeprovenance,andpaleogeographicsettingoftheElAntimonioGroup,Sonora,Mexico,inAnderson,T.H.,Nourse,J.A.,McKee,J.W.Steiner,M.B.(eds.),TheMojave-SonoraMegashearHypothesis:development,assessmentandalternati-ves:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper393,259-282.doi:10.1130/2005.2393..
Goodwin,D.G.,1999,Paleontology,paleoecology,anddepositionalenvi-ronmentswithintheUpperTriassic(Norian)carbonatestrataoftheAntimonioFormation,northwestSonora,Mexico:UniversityofMontana,M.Sc.thesis,209p.
Grajales-Nishimura,N.,Terrell,D.J.,Damon,P.E.,1992,EvidenciasdelaprolongacióndelarcomagmáticocordilleranodelTriasicotardío-JurásicoenChihuahua,DurangoyCoahuila:BoletíndelaAsociaciónMexicanadeGeólogosPetroleros,42,1-18.
Gross,E.L.,Stewart,J.H.,Gehrels,G.E.,2000,Detritalzircongeochro-nologyofNeoproterozoictoMiddleCambrianmiogeoclinalandplatformalstrata:NorthwestSonora,Mexico:GeofísicaInternacional,39,295-308.
Hardy,L.R.,1981,GeologyofthecentralSierradeSantaRosa,Sonora,
Mexico,inOrtlieb,L.,Roldán-Quintana,J.(eds.),GeologyofNorthwesternMexicoandSouthernArizona:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,CordilleranSectionAnnualMeeting,FieldGuidesandPapers,73-98.
InternationalComissiononStratigraphy-InternationalUnionofGeologicalSciences(ICS-IUGS),2007,InternationalStratigraphicChart:Paris, UNESCO and International Union of GeologicalSciences.
Iriondo,A.,Premo,W.R.,Martínez-Torres,L.M.,Budahn,J.R.,Atkinson,Jr.,W.W.,Siems,D.F.,Guarás-González,B.,2004,Isotopic,geochemicalandtemporalcharacterizationofPrecambrianbase-mentrocksintheQuitovacregion,northwesternSonora,Mexico:itsimplicationsforthetectonicreconstructionofsouthwesternNorthAmerica:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,116,154-170.
Izaguirre-Pompa,A.,Iriondo,A.,2007,Mesoproterozoic(~1.2Ga)quar-tziteandintrudinganorthosite(~1.08Ga)fromSierraPrieta,NWSonora:MexicanadditionstothePrecambrianhistoryofSWLaurentia(abstract),inOresandOrogenesis;AsymposiumhonoringthecareerofWilliamR.Dickinson:Tucson,Arizona,ArizonaGeologicalSociety,Programwithabstracts,257.
Karlstrom,K.E.,Doe,M.F.,Wessels,R.L.,Bowring,S.A.,Dann,J.C.,Williams,M.L.,1990,JuxtapositionofProterozoiccrustalbloc-ks:1.65-1.60Mazatzalorogeny,inGehrels,G.E.,Spencer,J.E.(eds.),GeologicExcursionsthroughtheSonoraDesertRegion,ArizonaandSonora:ArizonaGeologicalSurvey,SpecialPaper7,114-123.
Karlstrom,K.E.,Amato,J.M.,Williams,M.L.,Heizler,M.,Shaw,C.,Read,A.,Bauer,P.,2004,ProterozoicevolutionoftheNewMexicoregion:Asynthesis,inMack,G.H.,Giles,K.A.(eds.),TheGeologyofNewMexico:Ageologichistory:NewMexicoGeologicalSociety,SpecialPublication11,1-34.
Leggett,W.,Lawton,T.F.,Amato,J.,González-León,C.,2005,TheRanchoSanMartinformationnearCucurpe,Sonora,Mexico:arecordofMiddleJurassicarcmagmatismandcontinentaldepositioninarapidlysubsidingbasin:Geos,25,166.
Leggett,W.J.,Lawton,T.F.,Amato,J.M.,González-León,C.M.,2007,NewageconstraintsandgeochemicaldataonEarlytoMiddleJurassicstratanearCucurpe,Sonora,Mexico:ArecordoftheCordilleran-Nazasarcinnorth-centralSonora:OresandOrogenesis(abstract),inOresandOrogenesis;AsymposiumhonoringthecareerofWilliamR.Dickinson:Tucson,Arizona,ArizonaGeologicalSociety,Programwithabstracts,148.
Lucas,S.G.,Estep,J.W.,1999,Permian,Triassic,andJurassicstratigra-phy,biostratigraphy,andsequencestratigraphyintheSierradelÁlamoMuerto,Sonora,Mexico,inBartolini,C.,Wilson,J.L.,Lawton,T.F.(eds.),MesozoicSedimentaryandTectonicHistoryofNorth-CentralMexico:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper340,271-286.
Lucas,S.G.,Estep,J.W.,González-León,C.,Paull,R.K.,Silberling,N.J.,Steiner,M.B.,Marzolf,J.E.,1997,EarlyTriassicammonitesandconodontsfromSonora,northwesternMexico:NeuesJahrbuchfürGeologieundPaläontologie,Abhandlungen,9,562-574.
Lucas,S.G.,Estep,J.W.,Molina-Garza,R.S.,1999,EarlyJurassicammo-nitesatCerroPozosdeSerna,Sonora,Mexico:NeuesJahrbuchfürGeologieundPaläontologie,Monatshefte,6,357-37.
Ludwig,K.R.,2003,Isoplot/Ex3.00:AgeochronologicaltoolkitforMicrosoftExcel:BerkeleyGeochronologyCenter,SpecialPublication4.
Manuszak, J.D., Satterfield, J.I., Gehrels, G.E., 2000, Detrital zircon geochronologyofUpperTriassicstratainwesternNevada,inSoreghan,M.J.,Gehrels,G.E.(eds.),PaleozoicandTriassicPaleogeographyandTectonicsofWesternNevadaandNorthernCalifornia:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper347,109-118.
Marzolf,J.E.,Anderson,T.H.,2005,LowerMesozoicfaciesandcross-cuttingsequenceboundaries:constraintsondisplacementoftheCaborcaterrane,inAnderson,T.H.,Nourse,J.A.,McKee,J.W.,Steiner,M.B.(eds.),TheMojave-SonoraMegashearHypothesis:development,assessmentandalternatives:GeologicalSocietyof
González-León et al.314
America,SpecialPaper393,283-308.McAnulty,W.,1970,GeologyofthenorthernNacozaridistrict,Sonora,
Mexico:Albuquerque,USA,TheUniversityofNewMexico,Ph.D.thesis,103p.
McKee,J.W.,Jones,N.W.,Long,L.E.,1990,StratigraphyandprovenanceofstrataalongtheSanMarcosfault,centralCoahuila,Mexico.GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,102,593-614.
McKee,J.W.,Jones,N.W.,Anderson,T.H.,1999,LatePaleozoicandearlyMesozoichistoryoftheLasDeliciasterrane,Coahuila,México,inBartolini,C.,Wilson,J.L.,Lawton,T.F.(eds.),MesozoicSedimentaryandTectonicHistoryofNorth-CentralMexico:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper,340,161-189.
Miller,J.S.,Glazner,A.F.,Walker,J.D.,Martin,M.W.,1995,GeochronologicandisotopicevidenceforTriassic-JurassicemplacementoftheeugeoclinalallochthonintheMojaveDesertregion,California:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,107,1441-1547.
Molina-Garza,R.S.,2005,PaleomagneticreconstructionofCoahuilaMexico: the Late TriassicAcatita intrusives: GeofísicaInternacional,44,197-210.
Molina-Garza,R.S.,Geissman,J.W.,1996,TimingofdeformationandaccretionoftheAntimonioterrane,Sonora,frompaleomagneticdata:Geology,24,1131-1134.
Molina-Garza,R.S.,Iriondo,A.,2005,LaMegacizallaMojave-Sonora:lahipótesis,lacontroversiayelestadoactualdeconocimiento:BoletíndelaSociedadGeológicaMexicana,57(1),1-26.
Molina-Garza,R.S.,Geissman,J.W.,1999,PaleomagneticdatafromtheCaborcaterrane,Mexico:ImplicationsfortheCordillerantecton-icsandtheMojave-Sonoramegashearhypothesis:Tectonics,18,293-325,doi:10.1029/1998TC900030.
Montijo-Contreras, O., 2007, Estratigrafía y depósitos de grafito del Grupo Barranca,áreaLaLourdes-LaCumbre;LaColorada,Sonora:México,UniversidadNacionalAutónomadeMéxico,PosgradoenCienciasdelaTierra,M.Sc.Thesis,83p.
Moreno,F.A.,Mickus,K.L.,Keller,G.R.,2000,Crustalstructureandloca-tionoftheOuachitaorogenicbeltinnorthernMexico:GeofísicaInternacional,39,229-246.
Nourse,J.A.,Premo,W.R.,Iriondo,A.,Stahl,E.R.,2005,ConstrainingProterozoicbasementcomplexesnearthetruncatedmarginofLaurentia,northwesternSonora-Arizonainternationalborderregion,inAnderson,T.H.,Nourse,J.A.,McKee,J.W.andSteiner,M.B.(eds.),TheMojave-SonoraMegashearHypothesis:develop-ment,assessmentandalternatives:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper393,123-182,doi:10.1130/2005.2393.
Pálfy,J.,González-León,C.,2000,LowerJurassicammonoidbiostratigra-phyoftheAntimonioterrane,Sonora,northwesternMexico,inCalmus,T.,Pérez-Segura,E.(eds.),CuartaReuniónsobrelaGeologíadelNoroestedeMéxicoyÁreasAdyacentes,LibrodeResúmenes:InstitutodeGeología,UNAM,EstaciónRegionaldelNoroeste,PublicacionesOcasionales,2,87–88.
Poole,F.G.,Amaya-Martínez,R.,Page,W.R.,2000,SilurianandDevoniancarbonate-shelfrocksandLowerJurassicsequencenearRanchoPlaceritos,west-centralSonora:4thMeetingontheGeologyofNorthwestMexicoandAdjacentAreas,FieldTrip2,24p.
Poole, F.G., Gehrels, G.E., Stewart, J.H., 2008, Significance of detrital zirconsinUpperDevonianocean-basinstrataoftheSonoraallochthonandLowerPermiansynorogenicstrataoftheMinaMéxicoforedeep,centralSonora,México,inBlodgett,R.B.,Stanley,G.D.Jr.(eds.),TheTerranePuzzle:NewperspectivesonpaleontologyandstratigraphyfromtheNorthAmericanCordillera:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper442,121–131,doi:10.1130/2008.442(08).
Riggs,N.R.,Busby-Spera,C.J.,1990,Evolutionofmulti-ventvol-caniccomplexwithinasubsidingarcgrabendepression:MountWrightsonFormation,Arizona:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,102,1114-1135.
Riggs,N.R.,Busby-Spera,C.J.,1991,Faciesanalysisofanancient,dismembered,largecalderacomplexandimplicationsforintra-arcsubsidence:MiddleJurassicstrataofCobreRidge,southernArizona,USA:SedimentaryGeology,74,39-68.
Riggs,N.R.,Mattison,J.M.,Busby-Spera,C.J.,1993,Correlationof
JurassiceolianstratabetweenthemagmaticarcandtheColoradoPlateau:newU-PbgeochronologicdatafromsouthernArizona:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,105,1231-1246.
Riggs,N.R.,Lehman,T.M.,Gehrels,G.E.Dickinson,W.R.,1996,DetritalzirconlinkbetweenheadwatersandterminusoftheUpperTriassicChinle-Dockumpaleoriversystem:Science,273,97-100.
Scholz,A.,Aberhan,M.,González-León,C.M.,2008,EarlyJurassicbivalvesof theAntimonio terrane (Sonora,NWMexico):Taxonomy,biogeography,andpaleogeographicimplications,inBlodgett,R.B.,Stanley,G.D.(eds.),TheTerranePuzzle:NewperspectivesonpaleontologyandstratigraphyfromtheNorthAmericanCordillera:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper442,267–310,doi:10.1130/2008.442(14).
Silver,L.T.,Anderson,T.H.,1974,Possibleleft-lateralearlytoMiddleMesozoicdisruptionofthesouthwesternNorthAmericancratonmargin:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,AbstractswithPrograms,6(7),955-956.
Stanley,G.D.Jr.,González-León,C.M.,1995,PaleogeographicandtectonicimplicationsofTriassicfossilsandstratafromtheAntimonioFormation,northwesternSonora:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper301,17-20.
Steiner,M.B.,Pinos,O.,Lucas,S.G.,Marzolf,J.E.,Estep,J.W.,2005,PossibleEarlyTriassiclocationoftheCaborcablock,inAnderson,T.H.,Nourse,J.A.,McKee,J.W.Steiner,M.B.(eds.),TheMojave-SonoraMegashearHypothesis:development,assess-mentandalternatives:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,Special,Paper393,309-328.
Stewart,J.H.,Roldán-Quintana,J.,1991,UpperTriassicBarrancaGroup;nonmarineandshallowmarinerift-basindepositsofnorthwest-ernMexico:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper254,19-36.
Stewart,J.H.,Amaya-Martínez,R.,Stamm,R.G.,Wardlaw,B.R.,Stanley,G.D., Stevens, C.H., 1997, Stratigraphy and regional signifi-canceofMississippiantoJurassicrocksinSierraSantaTeresa,Sonora,Mexico:RevistaMexicanadeCienciasGeológicas,14(2),115-135.
StewartJ.H.,Gehrels,G.E.,Barth,A.P.,Link,P.K.,Christie-Blick,N.,Wrucke,C.T.,2001,DetritalzirconprovenanceofMesoproterozoictoCambrianarenitesinthewesternUnitedStatesandnorth-westernMexico:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,113,1343–1356.
StewartJ.H.,Amaya-Martínez,R.,Palmer,A.R.,2002,NeoproterozoicandCambrianstrataofSonora,Mexico:RodiniansupercontinenttoLaurentianCordilleranmargin,inBarth,A.(ed.),ContributionstocrustalevolutionofthesouthwesternUnitedStates:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper365,5-48.
Taylor,D.G.,Guex,J.,Rakus,M.,2001,HettangianandSinemurianam-monoidzonationforthewesternCordilleraofNorthAmerica:BulletindeGéologieLaussane,350,381-421.
Torres,R.,Ruiz,J.,Patchett,P.J.,Grajales,J.M.,1999,Permo-TriassiccontinentalarcineasternMéxico:Tectonicimplications,forreconstructionsofsouthernNorthAmerica, inBartolini,C.,Wilson,J.L.,Lawton,T.F.(eds.),MesozoicSedimentaryandTectonicHistoryofNorth-CentralMexico:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,SpecialPaper340,191-196.
Valentine,W.G.,1936,GeologyoftheCananeaMountains,Sonora,Mexico:GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBulletin,47,53–86.
Walker,J.D.,Martin,M.W.,Glazner,A.F.,2002,LatePaleozoictoMesozoicdevelopmentoftheMojaveDesertandenvirons,California,inGlazner,A.F.,Walker,J.D.,Bartley,J.M.(eds.),GeologicEvolutionoftheMojaveDesertandSouthwesternBasinandRange:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica,Memoir195,1-18.
Weber, R., 1997, How old is the Triassic flora of Sonora and Tamaulipas and news on Leonardian floras in Puebla and Hidalgo, Mexico: RevistaMexicanadeCienciasGeológicas,14(2),225-243.
Manuscriptreceived:September30,2008Correctedmanuscriptreceived:February15,2009Manuscriptaccepted:February17,2009