Comparasion_IEEEvsIEC

7/21/2019 Comparasion_IEEEvsIEC

1/12

Comparison of Standards ANSI / IEEE and IEC

Prepared by the Task Force under the Standards

SubcommitteeIEEE Transformers Committee


2/12

TF eport Summary The comparisons are based on the !atest pub!ished standards

un!ess identi"ed other#ise

It is the directi$e of the Standards Subcommittee to pub!ishthis comparison study each time a ma%or standard &IEEEC'()*+),,- C'()*+).,- or IEC ,,(0*1 is appro$ed andpub!ished

The purpose of this study is to pro$ide !ist of ma%or di2erencesbet#een IEEE and IEC standards to the members of the 3roup#orkin3 on these documents

In addition to these ma%or documents- #e #i!! inc!udecomparisons of other standards and 3uides common!y used forPo#er Transformers

It is hoped that the readers #ou!d consider harmoni4in3 thestandards as best as they can as they de$e!op these standardsfor the industry)


3/12

Inc!uded in 5arch +,** eport are6

C57.12.00-2010 with IEC 600076-1 (2000) By Vinay Mehrotra / Waukeha E!e"tri" #yte$

%ran&or$er %etin' C57.12.00-2010 e"tion * an+ C57.12.*0-2010

with IEC 600076-1 (2000) an+ IEC60076-,(2000) By ith Var'hee / Waukeha E!e"tri" #yte$

+urin' a"tory (%e$erature 3ie) %et o& Minera! 4i! I$$ere+E!e"tri"a! Eui$ent By a!i Mo!eki / # Myer In".

i'h %e$erature iui+-I$$ere+ %ran&or$er 3. 8. Marek / u8ont Ener'y #o!ution

C57.1,1-1**5 V. IEC 60219-1 Co$arion Bi!! ennin' / Waukeha E!e"tri" #yte$

%e$erature 3ie

:or+$an / BB %ran&or$er IEC 602*6 an+ IEC 60922 Co$arion to IEEE C57.106-2006

;i$ %ho$on / %3 #er


4/12

I$u!e %etin'

IEEE IEC

i'htnin'#euen"e

ine A 3W CW CW W:eutra! A 3W W W( &or 200BI)

ine A 3W W W Wire"t!y Earthe+ :eutra! A :ot3e"o$$en+e+.:ot +ire"t!y earthe+ A I$u!ee"ti


5/12

In+u"e %etIEEE IEC

IEEE C!a I /IEC C# uration A 7200 "y"!e FMa= %et ti$e A 60 e":o 8 Meaure$ent

uration A 120 J ( 3ate+ re /%et &reuen"y )Min tet ti$e A 15 e"

%heoreti"a! Ma= tet ti$e A 120e":o 8 Meaure$ent

IEEE C!a II /IEC 72.5 KV

7200 Cy"!e L 1.72 $ &o!!owe+@y 1 r L1.5 $8 ""etan"e !i$it A 500 C L1 hr

G 170 KV C# A C %et Vo!t&o!!owe+ @y 1., $ &or 5 $in8 ""etan"e !i$it A,00 C L1., $8 ""etan"e !i$it A100 C L1.1 $

170 KV CA 1.7 $&o!!owe+ @y 1.5 $ &or 60 $in

or ,0 $in (G ,00 KV )8""etan"e !i$it L 1.5$ A500 C8 ""etan"e !i$it L 1.1 $ A100 C

:on ni&or$Inu!ate+win+in'

:ot +e?ne+ %wo tet reuire+ A8hae to Earth8hae to hae


6/12

""etan"e "riteriaIEEE IEC

3atio an+o!arity Within /-0.5 D o& :a$e !ate .or a!! &or Vo!t er turn e="ee+0.5 D o& :8


7/12

""etan"e "riteria ( "ontP+)IEEE IEC

oe :o !oa+ H not to e="ee+ 10 D o&e"i?e+oa+ !o H not to e="ee+ 6 D:ot a "riteria &or ree"tion

%ota! !oe A 10 D within+i


8/12

No !oad test

IEEE IEC

Wa


9/12

7oad test

IEEE IEC

Min oa+"urrent

50 D o& rate+ "urrent

$@ient"on+ition &ortet

%o an+ Bt$ 4i! +i>eren"e notto e="ee+ 50".reuen"y o& tet our"e within/- 0.5 D o& no$ina!

%o an+ Bt$ 4i! +i>eren"e ha!!@e $a!!

I$e+an"e on4ther %a

E=tre$e ta $eaure$entreuire+ on ?rt unit.

I& tain' ran'e e="ee+ /- 5 D i$e+an"e on two e=tre$eta are a!o reuire+

8eroSe9uenceTest 0nit o&$eaure

3eorte+ in D o& KV @ae E=ree+ in oh$ er hae

%et ro"e+ure

&or win+in'with twoneutra!

Mini$u$ o& three tet are

e"i?e+ to arri


10/12

#oun+ %et

IEEE IEC

Metho+ #oun+ 8reure !eerent!y

Meaure$ent"ontour

0., $ &ro$ oun+ ro+u"in'ur&a"e F2 $ &or &anBe!ow 2.9 $ an+ @e!ow - at

ha!& hei'ht at 1/, an+ 2/, &orhi'her hei'ht unit. Mi"rohone2 $eter aart F $in 9

0., $ &ro$ oun+ ro+u"in'ur&a"e F2 $ &or &anBe!ow 2.5 $ an+ @e!ow - at

ha!& hei'ht at 1/, an+ 2/, &orhi'her hei'ht.Mi"rohone 2 $eter aart F $in6

3ate+ /3e+u"e+

Current %et

:o $etho+o!o'y ro


11/12

#oun+ %et

IEEE IEC

#oun+ IntenityMeaure$ent

:ot +e?ne+ 8ro"e+ure out!ine+

#oun+ 8ower!e


12/12

Mi"e!!aneou %etIEEE IEC

%a "han'er :o +e?ne+ %et ro"e+ure or"riteria e-ener'iTe+ "y"!e F +e-ener'iTe+ an+ 5 D u=Vo!ta'e 1 "y"!e F ener'iTe+ 1"y"!e F rate+ "urrent 10oeration a"rore

Comparasion_IEEEvsIEC

Documents

Transcript of Comparasion_IEEEvsIEC