C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales
-
Upload
sebstian -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
260 -
download
0
description
Transcript of C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales
![Page 1: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
VOTACIÓN PRESIDENCIAL
![Page 2: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF ANTIOQUIA
porcentage number of votesSantos 45.3% 855.864Mockus 20.89% 394.592Vargas 13.48% 254.554Sanín 9.21% 174.136En Blanco 2.3% 43.724Voto Nulo 1.51% 28.427
![Page 3: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF ATLÁNTICO
porcentage number of votesSantos 37.29% 189.702Mockus 23.27% 118.411Vargas 15.06% 76.638Sanín 13.03% 66.276En Blanco 0.95% 4.816Voto Nulo 0.78% 4.029
![Page 4: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF BOLÍVAR
porcentage number of votesSantos 56.24% 276.710Mockus 16.67% 82.008Vargas 13.96% 68.699Sanín 7.11% 34.972En Blanco 1.06% 5.205Voto Nulo 0.87% 4.280
![Page 5: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF BOYACA porcentage number of votesSantos 51.69% 244.853 Mockus 22.39% 106.058Vargas 8.61% 40.799Sanín 5.94% 28.161En Blanco 1.29% 6.130Voto Nulo 1.12% 5.319
![Page 6: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF CALDAS porcentage number of votesSantos 43.95% 172.459Mockus 19.41% 76.214Vargas 12.61% 49.467Sanín 12.13% 47.601En Blanco 1.96% 7.700Voto Nulo 2.36% 9.278
![Page 7: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF CAUCA
porcentage number of votesSantos 35.9% 123.661Mockus 28.44% 97.984Vargas 11.25% 38.766Sanín 9.66% 33.274En Blanco 2.14% 7.359Voto Nulo 1.86% 6.415
![Page 8: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF CESAR
porcentage number of votesSantos 56.24% 148.920Mockus 19.89% 52.669Vargas 10.66% 28.229Sanín 5.24% 13.874En Blanco 1.17% 3.090Voto Nulo 0.87% 2.294
![Page 9: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF CÓRDOBA
porcentage number of votesSantos 48.36% 216.106Mockus 17.02% 76.033Vargas 14.87% 66.460Sanín 11.11% 49.628En Blanco 0.97% 4.340Voto Nulo 0.89% 3.988
![Page 10: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF CUNDINAMARCA
porcentage number of votesSantos 57.13% 507.746Mockus 16.61% 147.659Vargas 9.11% 81.003Sanín 6.5% 57.775En Blanco 1.35% 12.006Voto Nulo 1.29% 11.429
![Page 11: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF CHOCO
porcentage number of votesSantos 52.48% 45.274Mockus 27.07% 23.358Vargas 6.43% 5.653Sanín 5.34% 4.610En Blanco 2.04% 1.755Voto Nulo 2.06% 1.778
![Page 12: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF HUILA
porcentage number of votesSantos 60.6% 202.594Mockus 16.84% 56.297Vargas 5.97% 19.958Sanín 5.81% 19.448En Blanco 1.19% 4.976Voto Nulo 0.94% 3.142
![Page 13: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF NARIÑO
porcentage number of votesSantos 48.36% 216.106Mockus 17.02% 76.033Vargas 14.87% 66.460Sanín 11.11% 49.628En Blanco 0.97% 4.340Voto Nulo 0.89% 3.988
![Page 14: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
DEPÀRTMENT OF PUTUMAYO
porcentage number of votesSantos 23.35% 19.224Mockus 28.9% 20.838Vargas 9.05% 16.840Sanín 11.03% 6.525En Blanco 1.87% 11.350Voto Nulo 0.65% 781
![Page 15: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF RISARALDA
porcentage number of votesSantos 48.33% 171.411Mockus 23.36% 79.313Vargas 10.11% 35.872Sanín 8.68% 30.785En Blanco 2% 7.136Voto Nulo 1.8% 6.395
![Page 16: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF NORTE DE SANTANDER
porcentage number of votesSantos 54.09% 246.355Mockus 14.41% 88.451Vargas 9.49% 43.231Sanín 6.07% 27.658En Blanco 1.23% 5.622Voto Nulo 1.14% 5.202
![Page 17: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
DEPARMENT OF QUINDIO
porcentage number of votesSantos 48.57% 103.866Mockus 22.5% 48.126Vargas 10.87% 23.243Sanín 6.9% 13.890En Blanco 1.99% 4.258Voto Nulo 1.95% 4.164
![Page 18: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF SANTANDER
porcentage number of votesSantos 43.48% 334.265Mockus 23.77% 182.754Vargas 11.73% 90.259Sanín 7.18% 55.172En Blanco 1.36% 10.462Voto Nulo 1.05% 8.063
![Page 19: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF SUCRE
porcentage number of votesSantos 54.58% 145.967Mockus 24.66% 65.934Vargas 8.7% 23.286Sanín 4.92% 13.148En Blanco 0.74% 1.980Voto Nulo 0.88% 2.341
![Page 20: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF TOLIMA
porcentage number of votesSantos 58.47% 283.376Mockus 16.55% 80.251Vargas 7.19% 34.832Sanín 5.39% 26.131En Blanco 1.6% 7.742Voto Nulo 1.25% 6.071
![Page 21: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF VALLE DEL CAUCA
porcentage number of votesSantos 37.78% 513.083Mockus 27.82% 377.891Vargas 9.68% 131.582Sanín 9.68% 131.525En Blanco 2.06% 28.110Voto Nulo 1.36% 18.425
![Page 22: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF VICHADA
porcentage number of votesSantos 58.97% 5.925Mockus 20.63% 2.039Vargas 6.01% 594Sanín 5.35% 529En Blanco 1.02% 101Voto Nulo 0.61% 60
![Page 23: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF VAUPEZ
porcentage number of votesSantos 38.99% 1.853Mockus 25.67% 1.220Vargas 14.26% 678Sanín 7.7% 366En Blanco 0.84% 40Voto Nulo 0.65% 31
![Page 24: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF AMAZONAS
porcentage number of votesSantos 38.6% 5.753Mockus 27.39% 4.083Vargas 9.45% 1.408Sanín 8.98% 1.339En Blanco 1.47% 219Voto Nulo 1.14% 170
![Page 25: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF SAN ANDRES
porcentage number of votesSantos 51.56% 6.314Mockus 28.27% 3.463Vargas 5.14% 630Sanín 4.6 % 564En Blanco 1.61% 197Voto Nulo 0.6% 74
![Page 26: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF GUAVIARE
porcentage number of votesSantos 56.17% 9.501Mockus 23.33% 4.361Vargas 7.38% 1.379Sanín 4.26 % 797En Blanco 1.92% 359Voto Nulo 1.39% 259
![Page 27: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF META
porcentage number of votesSantos 61.78% 183.224Mockus 17.89% 53.066Vargas 8.89% 26.382Sanín 4.38% 12.984En Blanco 1.23% 3.637Voto Nulo 0.95% 2.826
![Page 28: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF GUAINIA
porcentage number of votesSantos 49.28% 3.203Mockus 23.25% 1.511Vargas 14.05% 913Sanín 4.45% 289En Blanco 1.6% 104Voto Nulo 1.06% 69
![Page 29: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF MAGDALENA
porcentage number of votesSantos 56.5% 183.757Mockus 18.85% 61.306Vargas 11.5% 37.394Sanín 4.68% 15.233En Blanco 1.01% 3.300Voto Nulo 0.84% 2.731
![Page 30: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF CASANARE
porcentage number of votesSantos 75.23% 96.270Mockus 12.41% 15.887Vargas 5.42% 6.938Sanín 2.68% 3.425En Blanco 1.2% 1.540Voto Nulo 0.83% 1.60
![Page 31: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF CAQUETÁ
porcentage number of votesSantos 59.01% 53.120Mockus 17.45% 15.708Vargas 7.37% 6.630Sanín 4.59% 4.142En Blanco 2.58% 2.324Voto Nulo 0.78% 713
![Page 32: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
DEPARTMENT OF ARAUCA
porcentage number of votesSantos 59.05% 33.257Mockus 17.67% 9.953Vargas 7.67% 4.318Sanín 7 % 3.943En Blanco 2.23% 1.256Voto Nulo 1.38% 778
![Page 33: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
TOTALES
Santos = 5,599.719 Mockus = 2,423.471 Vargas = 1,283.095 Sanin = 927.828 En Blanco = 195.178 Voto Nulo = 143.680
![Page 34: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
ESTADISTICAS
![Page 35: C:\fakepath\votos precidenciales](https://reader035.fdocuments.ec/reader035/viewer/2022062303/557fff74d8b42a693c8b472f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Conclutions My conclutions were that with all the votes that
joined santos of th partido cambio radical,the partido conservador,and partido liberal Mockus only with the people that goes with him he can not win.If he want towin he has to propose for his campain things that people like to do :for example santos said that he dont want to raise the impuestos because the economy is good and people dont like to pay impuestos so thats a check for santos.Mockus proposed to raise up the impuestos because economy is Good.but dont apologise that propose because people dont like to pay impuestos so he has to do something to attract cambio radical,partido conservador and partido Liberal.witha that votes he can win.