Tort

11
1 T H E L A W O F TORT W rong fu l Act W ron g fu l Om issio n D E FIN ITIO N m oral w ron g tre sp a ss to person tre sp a ss to lan d n eg lig en ce n u isa n ce c ivil crim in al legal w ron g SCOPE
  • date post

    19-Oct-2014
  • Category

    Education

  • view

    276
  • download

    0

description

 

Transcript of Tort

Page 1: Tort

1

TH E L A W O F TO R T

W ron g fu lA c t

W ron g fu lO m iss ion

D E F IN ITIO N

m ora lw ron g

tresp assto p erson

tresp assto lan d

n eg lig en ce n u isan ce

c ivil c rim in a l

leg a lw ron g

S C O P E

Page 2: Tort

2

IN TE N TIO N A L TO R T : TR E S P A S S TO P E R S O N

m en ta l s ta teo f th e D

TU B E R V IL L E

effec t onth e P

B L A K E

cap ab ility tocarry ou tth e th rea t

S TE P H E N S

b od ilym ovem en ts

IN N E S

elem en ts can w ord scon s titu teassau lt?

R v W IL S O N

A S S A U L T

Page 3: Tort

3

IN TE N TIO N A L TO R T : TR E S P A S S TO P E R S O N

m en ta l s ta teo f D

S C O TT

D 's ac t u n d erh is con tro lG IB B O N S

C on tac tC O L E

W ith ou tP 's con sen tTIO N G P H

e lem en ts o f b a tte ry

issu e o fcon sen t

con tac t p ro tec tion

d iffe ren ce b e tw eenassau lt &

b a tte ry

B A TTE R Y

Page 4: Tort

4

IN TE N TIO N A L TO R T : TR E S P A S S TO L A N D

m en ta l s ta teB A S E L Y

en te rin gth e lan dTA N W C

rem a in in gon th e lan d

TA Y TK

P lac in gO b jec ts

O S M O N D

in te rfe ren ce to a irsp aceK E L S E N

in te rfe ren ceG R E G O R Y

elem en ts o f trep assto lan d

TR E S P A S S TO L A N DA rt. 1 3 (1 ) F CS ec . 5 N L C

S ec . 4 4 (1 )(a ) N L C

Page 5: Tort

5

IN TE N TIO N A L TO R T

se lf-d e fen ce d efen cean oth er

d e fen cep rop erty

con trib u t.n eg lig en ce

n ecess ity m is take in evitab leacc id en t

con sen t d isc ip lin e

D E F E N S E S TO IN TE N TIO N A L TO R TS ec .2 6

Page 6: Tort

6

U N IN TE N TIO N A L TO R T : N E G L IG E N C E

D u ty O f C areD O N O G H U E

reason ab lem an

reason ab lefo reseeab le

B reach O fD u ty o f care

vo len ti con trib u tn eg lig en ce

m ech an ica l d e fec t/in evitab le acc id en t

D efen ses

N E G L IG E N C E

Page 7: Tort

7

U N IN TE N TIO N A L TO R T : N U IS A N C E

p rosecu tedc rim e

P u b licN u isan ce

su b s tan tia l con tin u ou s

loca lity b en e fit if an y extra -sen s it ive tem p orary/iso la ted

u n reason ab le

P riva teN u isan ce

N U IS A N C E

Page 8: Tort

8

TY P E S O F L IA B IL ITY

resp on d en tsu p erio r

m as te rn eg lec t/fa ilto con tro lem p loyee

m as te rb en e fits

m as te rh as d eep er

p ocke t

R ation a leIM P E R IA L C H E M

offen d eris th e em p loyee

(sp ec ia lre la tion sh ip )

em p loyeecom m itted

to rt(to rt iou s ac t)

to rt com m ittedin th e cou rse

o f em p loym en t

c la im an t m u s t p rove

V IC A R IO U S L IA B IL ITY

Page 9: Tort

9

V IC A R IO U S L IA B IL ITY

con tro l tes t in te rg ra tion tes t h irin g o f se rvan tscon trac t

h osp ita l s ta ff&

p o lice o ffice r

W h o is em p loyee /servan t?

Page 10: Tort

10

TY P E S O F L IA B IL ITY

L iab ility w ith ou t fau ltR Y L A N D

d an g erou s ob jec tsH O C K TA I

in ten tion a ls to rag eM IL E S

escap eM ID W O O D

n on -n a tu ra lu se o f lan dR IC K A R D S

e lem en ts o f liab ilityc la im an t m u s t

es tab lish ed

S TR IC T L IA B IL ITY

Page 11: Tort

11

S TR IC T L IA B IL ITY

P con sen tS H E IK H A M IN

C om m onb en efit

D U N N E

ac t o f th irdp arty

R IC K A R D S

A c t o f G odN IC H O L S

P d e fau lt

D E F E N C E S