Shortlisted Candidates for Written Examination Dental Surgeon
Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018. 9. 1. · Provincial Examination Results...
Transcript of Provincial Examination Results - New Brunswick · 2018. 9. 1. · Provincial Examination Results...
PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch
DDeecceemmbbeerr 22001100
To obtain additional copies of this report, or to forward your comments, please use the following address:
Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch Department of Education and Early Childhood Development
of New Brunswick P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, NB
E3B 5H1
Tel.: 506-453-2157 Fax: 506-462-2201
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1
December 2010 _____________________________________________________________
Une version française de ce document est également disponible.
Contact/Téléphonez aux Communications 506-444-4714
Fax/Télécopie: 506-457-4810
E-ail: [email protected] Internet : http://www.gnb.ca/0000/francophone-f.asp#1
PPrroovviinncciiaall EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
FFrraannccoopphhoonnee SScchhooooll DDiissttrriiccttss DDeecceemmbbeerr 22001100
ISBN : 978-1-55471-469-1
Francophone School Districts
IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn
i
IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn
he Department of Education and Early Childhood Development is pleased to present this provincial
statistical report to give school staff, parents, and the public a general idea of how students in New Brunswick’s Francophone school districts did on the provincial examinations administered in the 2009-2010 school year. This document has four chapters. The first is an overview of the learning evaluation program. The second chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the elementary level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 2 and Grade 4 Literacy, Grades 5 and 8 Sciences et technologies, Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques, and Grades 5 and 8 Français.
The third chapter provides details on the learning evaluation program at the high school level. It contains the results of the examinations in Grade 11 Mathématiques and Grade 11 Français, as well as the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment. The fourth chapter contains a brief description of pan-Canadian and international assessments in addition to results showing how New Brunswick matches up against the other Canadian provinces and the OECD member countries on these assessments. Any comments likely to make this report more informative and complete should be sent to the following address: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development Francophone Assessment and Evaluation Branch P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, N.B. E3B 5H1
T
ii
Table of Contents
iii
TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn......................................................................................................................... i
CChhaapptteerr 11 PPrroovviinncciiaall EEvvaalluuaattiioonn PPrrooggrraamm aatt tthhee EElleemmeennttaarryy aanndd HHiigghh SScchhooooll LLeevveellss
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?............. 1 What subjects were tested? ................................................................................... 1
How are the exams prepared? ............................................................................... 1
How are the exams administered? ......................................................................... 2
How is exam marking coordinated? ....................................................................... 2
How are the exams marked? ................................................................................. 2
Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results? .............. 2
How are the exams followed up? ........................................................................... 3
CChhaapptteerr 22 PPrroovviinncciiaall EElleemmeennttaarryy SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level...................... 5
What is the purpose of these exams? ........................................................ 5
What is tested? .......................................................................................... 5
CChhaapptteerr 33 PPrroovviinncciiaall HHiigghh SScchhooooll EExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReessuullttss
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level ............................... 67
What is the purpose of these exams? ...................................................... 67
What is the passing grade? ...................................................................... 67
Table of Contents
iv
CChhaapptteerr 44 RReessuullttss ooff PPaann--CCaannaaddiiaann aanndd IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall AAsssseessssmmeennttss
Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA)
Assessment Programs ................................................................................... 117
What are SAIP and PCAP? .................................................................... 117
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP? ............................................. 117
Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP? ............................................. 118
What is PISA?......................................................................................... 118
Who participates in PISA? ...................................................................... 118
How are students selected? (PISA) ........................................................ 119
How is the information used? (PISA) ...................................................... 119
CCoonncclluussiioonn ....................................................................................................................... 143
Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels
Chapter 1
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?
For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These are
What subjects were tested?
All the results presented in this document arefrom the 14 provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2009-2010 school year. The subjectstested were as follows:
- Grades 2 and 4 Literacy;- Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques;
1
Chapter 1
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels
Why is there a provincial evaluation program in New Brunswick schools?
For a number of years now, New Brunswickhas been looking more closely at theeducation system and its performance. Areschools preparing students to becomecommitted, productive, and responsiblecitizens? Will students be ready to meet thechallenges of the 21st century? These arequestions being asked by parents, othereducation stakeholders, and New Brunswicktaxpayers as a whole.
To answer these questions, a provincialevaluation program was set up to assessstudents’ skills in literacy, mathematics, andscience and technology at key stages in theeducation system.
The provincial evaluations are also used toassess studies for the purpose of awardingthe high school diploma.
What subjects were tested?
All the results presented in this document arefrom the 14 provincial examinationsadministered from kindergarten to Grade 12 inthe 2009-2010 school year. The subjectstested were as follows:
- Grades 2 and 4 Literacy;- Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques;- Grades 5 and 8 Français;- Grades 5 and 8 Sciences &
technologies;- Grade10 ESL;- Grade 11 Mathématiques (regularand modified; and
- Grade 11 Français (regular and modified).
How are the exams prepared?
The provincial examinations are developedtogether with teaching staff. Supervision isprovided by provincial evaluation consultantsin association with the provincial and districtcurriculum officers concerned. The theoreticalfoundations and nature of the exams aredefined in the assessment framework for eachsubject.
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels ‐ Chapter 1
How are the exams administered?
The rules and procedures to be followed inorder to ensure uniform administration of theexams are set out in an administration guide,which is updated and distributed to theschools for each exam session. TheFrancophone Assessment and EvaluationBranch is responsible for coordinating andadministering the exams .
How is exam marking coordinated?
For each subject tested, head markers aretrained beforehand to oversee the use of themarking grids and ensure uniform scoringprovince-wide. Marking is coordinated byprovincial evaluation consultants incooperation with provincial curriculum officers.
Are there any precautions to bear in mind when interpreting the results?
When comparing averages for a given subject,we must take into account the measurementerror associated with each score before wecan claim there is a difference between twoaverages. Using the standard error, a range(confidence interval) is established, withinwhich the true value of the average is locatedin 95% of cases. The 95% confidence intervalused in this report is calculated by adding twostandard errors on each side of the average.The difference between the averages of twoschools is said to be significant if theirconfidence intervals do not overlap.
In reviewing the provincial examination resultsat the high school level, it should be noted thatstudents enrolled in regular-level courses writeone set of exams, while those enrolled in
2
How are the exams marked?
Once the exams have been administered, thehigh school students’ booklets are sent tothree marking centres located in Shediac,Edmundston, and Bathurst. The elementaryschool students’ booklets are sent to a singlemarking centre at either the Moncton orEdmundston campus of the Université deMoncton. The constructed-response questionsare marked by teaching staff under thecoordination of the head markers (teachers ordistrict supervisors), who are trained by theprovincial evaluation consultants. Theselected-response questions are markedelectronically .
gone set of exams, while those enrolled inmodified-level courses write another.Interestingly, in schools having a largepercentage of students enrolled at the regularlevel, the results are often better than, or atleast comparable with, those of other schoolsfor both the regular- and modified-levelexams. This makes it very important toconsider the percentage of students enrolledat each level.
We must bear in mind as well that provincialexam marks and school marks are only two ofmany factors indicating a school’s overallsituation. Socioeconomic conditions,demographics, what is expected of students,and parental involvement also influencestudent performance. This report does nottake the latter factors into account.
Chapter 1 ‐ Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels
How are the exams followed up?
At the high school level, a statistical reportbreaking down the results by skill and contentis published after each exam session. Itcontains a description of the school resultsand the provincial average for each subject.This statistical report is available in PDFformat at the following Web address :
http://www.gnb.ca/education/francophone-f.asp#1
The school districts, together with the schooladministrators and teaching staff, areresponsible for interpreting the results anddeveloping an education plan. The statisticsare reviewed at the provincial level to aid indecision making regarding curricula.
3
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary and High School Levels ‐ Chapter 1
4
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chapter 2
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or not
What is tested?
The exams are developed on the basis of a list of topics drawn up by school district personnel and Department consultants. The topics are derived from the provincial curricula and identify the elements essential for further
5
Chapter 2
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the Elementary School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial evaluation program at theelementary school level has a very specificobjective: to use the information obtained fromthe exams to determine whether or notstudents have mastered the skills and abilitiesassociated with the curricula being evaluated.
Using the results, teaching staff and schooladministrators can develop and applyappropriate action strategies for correctingweaknesses noted among students, and canguide students in a review of what they havelearned.
The results are also analyzed by the schoolsand school districts and the Department ofEducation.
What is tested?
The exams are developed on the basis of a list of topics drawn up by school district personnel and Department consultants. The topics are derived from the provincial curricula and identify the elements essential for further development of skills in Grades 5 and 8 Sciences et technologies, in Grades 3, 5, and 8 Mathématiques, and in Grades 5 and 8 Français.
At the end of Grade 2, reading comprehensionis evaluated at the provincial level. This examconsists of a reading comprehension test andan oral reading test. Reading comprehensionis also evaluated at the beginning of Grade 4.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Grade 2 provincial literacy exam, percentage of students having achieved level 3 or 4
Description of performance levels for the Grade 2 literacy exam
Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.
Level 2 – The student will be able to:read and understand straightforward, illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read variousfamiliar words, e.g., cat, dog, happy, give; break down words into their constituent sounds,e.g., teach-er, pa-per; read various words made up of complex sounds, e.g., neighbour,bread; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; read while making mistakesthat do not change the meaning of a text; retell what he/she has read and give additionaldetails when asked questions; identify the main characters and events.
Level 3* – The student will be able to:d d d t d ill t t d t t d t hi /h l l d f f ili d
6
Level 3 – The student will be able to:read and understand illustrated texts geared to his/her level; read a range of familiar words,e.g., eyes, red, morning, reading; read words made up of complex sounds, e.g., friend, said,would; explain how he/she tackles new words when reading; find the meaning of a wordbased on the context; read fluently and observe punctuation marks; retell what he/she hasread and describe most of the events of the story; describe the characters, the centralproblem, and how the problem is solved; find answers to questions using clues contained inthe text.
Level 4 – The student will be able to:read and understand texts geared to his/her level, with or without picture support; explain the varioustechniques he/she uses to read words; find the meaning of a word based on the context; readfluently and observe punctuation marks so as to read expressively; retell what he/she has read anddescribe the main events of the story; describe the characters, the central problem, and how theproblem is solved; find answers to questions using clues given in the text or by drawing on personalexperiences or even by making generalizations extending beyond the content of the text.
* By the end of Grade 2, students are expected to have attained Level 3.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 1
District 01 n= 657
District 03 n= 412
District 05 n= 344
District 09 n= 429
District 11 n= 368
Province n= 2210
Chart 2
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy assessment at Grade 2 by District, Including the Province
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
Grade 2
Literacy
74 75 74 71 73 737579 81
7673
77
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Reading Comprehension Oral Reading
target
S l d
Des Bâtisseurs n= 100
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 22
Saint‐Henri n= 74
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 22
Amirault n= 172
Abbey‐Landry n= 42
Sainte‐Thérèse n= 68
Champlain n= 102
District 01 n= 657
Province n= 2210
7
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 55Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
73
74
75
71
79
82
41
61
73
75
76
77
75
76
78
74
85
41
51
73
75
85
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Sainte‐Thérèse
Abbey‐Landry
Amirault
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 3
Ernest‐Lang * n= 5
Sainte‐Anne n= 15
Saint‐Joseph n= 13
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Grade 2
Literacy
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 12
Centre d'appren‐
tissage du Haut‐
Madawaska
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 36
Régionale
Saint‐Basilen= 27
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03
n= 20
65
72
69
85
59
92
73
80
78
65
61
78
85
100
78
100
67
80
86
G d i iè
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang *
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 39
Notre‐Dame n= 46
Grande‐Rivière n= 27
Mgr‐Lang n= 19
Marie‐Immaculée n= 30
Echo Jeunesse n= 31
Mgr‐Martin n= 41
District 03 n= 412
Province n= 2210
8
n= 31
n= 20
Élémentaire
Sacré‐Coeur
Régional de
Saint‐André
73
75
93
71
80
84
70
70
65
77
79
80
77
90
74
75
65
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 4
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 64
n= 39
Le Tournesol n= 49
Séjour‐Jeunesse * n= 4
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Grade 2
Literacy
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveurn= 6
Carrefour‐
Étudiantn= 30
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 13
La Croisée
Académie
Assomptionn= 14
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 05
59
80
93
69
59
54
77
50
91
59
90
86
76
79
92
77
83
86
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse *
Le Tournesol
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
Apollo‐XI n= 40
Mgr‐Melanson n= 17
Versant‐Nord n= 17
Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 6
Arthur‐Pinet n= 7
District 05 n= 344
Province n= 2210
9
n= 20
n= 18Académie
Notre‐Dame
Domaine‐des‐
Copains
73
74
50
43
67
83
88
59
77
81
75
86
67
89
88
59
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 5
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 10
Centre la fontaine n= 23
René‐Chouinard n= 13
L'Amitié n= 21
La Source n= 34
La Ruche n= 64
La Passerelle n= 26
L'Envolée n= 47
L'Étincelle n= 15
La‐Rivière n= 12
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
Grade 2
Literacy
District 09
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐
Saint‐Isidoren= 23
50
87
79
61
69
67
76
52
38
65
70
75
87
89
83
81
67
91
38
62
65
60
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 22
Le Maillon n= 13
Ola‐léger n= 17
Province n= 2210
District 09 n= 429
10
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 33
n= 10
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 46
L'Escale‐des‐
Jeunes
73
71
59
60
77
89
77
82
50
77
76
53
60
100
83
73
88
75
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Le Maillon
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 6
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 44
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 16
Grande‐Digue n= 23
Donat‐Robichaud n= 24
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 2
La Marée‐
Montanten= 29
Régionale‐de‐
Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 17
Père‐Edgar‐
T.‐LeBlanc
Grade 2
Literacy
District 11
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 20
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 30
80
63
63
88
78
88
75
77
62
95
60
70
70
67
87
82
69
80
66
85
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 15
Camille‐Vautour n= 23
Saint‐Paul n= 6
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 12
Notre‐Dame n= 11
District 11 n= 368
Province n= 2210
Blanche‐
Bourgeoisn= 16
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 28
11
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 54
73
73
82
75
64
75
33
61
80
77
73
93
75
36
75
67
52
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont Carmel
Percentages
Oral Reading Reading Comprehension
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Percentage of students having passed the provincial Grade 3 Mathématiques exam
12
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 7
District 01 n= 586
District 03 n= 434
District 05 n= 333
District 09 n= 409
District 11 n= 374
Province n= 2136
Chart 8
Grade 3
Mathématiques
Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including the Province
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
7570 68
7267
71
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
Des Bâtisseurs n= 91
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 22
Anna Malenfant n= 105
Saint‐Henri n= 75
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 21
Amirault n= 39
Abbey‐Landry n= 37
Sainte‐Thérèse n= 57
Champlain n= 93
District 01 n= 586
Province n= 2136
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 46
13
71
75
48
63
76
72
95
83
87
68
80
87
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Sainte‐Thérèse
Abbey‐Landry
Amirault
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 9
Ernest‐Lang n= 9
Sainte‐Anne n= 13
Saint‐Joseph n= 22
Grade 3
Mathématiques
District 03 Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 42
Centre d'appren‐
tissage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 28
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 11
Régionale
Saint‐Basilen= 22
82
53
65
91
77
82
85
56
79
64
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 55
Notre‐Dame n= 51
Grande‐Rivière n= 20
Mgr‐Lang n= 23
Marie‐Immaculée n= 17
Echo Jeunesse n= 28
Mgr‐Martin n= 37
District 03 n= 434
Province n= 2136
Élémentaire
Sacré‐Coeurn= 38
Régional de
Saint‐Andrén= 18
14
71
70
76
79
94
61
44
50
82
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 10
n= 57
n= 28
n= 48
n= 1
Carrefour‐Étudiant n= 39
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 15
Académie
Assomptionn= 16
La Croisée
Le Tournesol
Séjour‐Jeunesse *
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveurn= 8
Grade 3
Mathématiques
District 05
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
79
67
100
54
50
93
54
88
75
M M l
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse *
Le Tournesol
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 36
n= 14
n= 16
n= 10
n= 6
District 05 n= 333
Province n= 2136
Mgr‐Melanson
Versant‐Nord
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 23
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Apollo‐XI
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 16
15
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
71
68
81
83
50
52
88
79
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 11
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 9
Centre la fontaine n= 24
René‐Chouinard n= 9
L'Amitié n= 22
La Source n= 36
La Ruche n= 54
La Passerelle n= 23
L'Envolée n= 45
L'Étincelle n= 18
La‐Rivière n= 12
n= 20La Relève‐de‐
Saint‐Isidore
Grade 3
Mathématiques
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
75
61
67
70
74
72
67
73
78
75
67
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 25
Le Maillon n= 13
Ola‐léger n= 13
District 09 n= 409
Province n= 2136
n= 41
L'Escale‐des‐
Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandre
16
n= 29
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoys
n= 16
71
72
69
88
100
88
68
55
75
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Le Maillon
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 12
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 30
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 15
Grande‐Digue n= 27
Donat‐Robichaud n= 38
Régionale‐de‐
Baie‐Sainte‐Annen= 19
Père‐Edgar‐
T.‐LeBlancn= 26
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 19
La Marée‐
Montanten= 48
Grade 3
Mathématiques
District 11 Percentage of Students Having Passed the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam
91
81
58
68
89
84
47
53
52
84
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 11
Camille‐Vautour n= 23
Saint‐Paul n= 6
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 6
Notre‐Dame n= 12
District 11 n= 374
Province n= 2136
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 57
Blanche‐
Bourgeoisn= 18
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 19
17
71
67
42
56
92
83
67
57
91
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Provincial Grade 4 Literacy exam,percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher, by school, including the districts and province
Description of performance levels for the Grade 4 literacy exam
Level 1 – The student has significant difficulty in reading.
Level 2 – The student will be able to:find the meaning of certain words or expressions from the context; retrieve certain explicitinformation and combine information according to a proposed structure; identify the subjectof the text and most of the important information; make certain predictions when theinformation is explicit; provide meaning for certain substitution words; identify the structuralelements of the text; reconstruct the chronological order of certain events of the story; makeconnections between the different parts of the text and relate some ideas to personalexperiences; make inferences clearly suggested by the text but will sometimes have troublejustifying them; respond to the text with personal experiences.
Level 3* – The student will be able to:find the meaning of most of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve most of theexplicit information select various relevant pieces of information and combine them
18
find the meaning of most of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve most of theexplicit information, select various relevant pieces of information and combine themaccording to a proposed structure; identify the important information and the main idea;make accurate predictions when the information is explicit and certain predictions when theinformation is implicit; provide meaning for various substitution words and some linkingwords; use indices to guide understanding and interpret certain elements of pictorialrepresentation; reconstruct the chronological order and most of the events of the story;make connections between the different parts of the text and relate most of the ideas topersonal experiences; make inferences and justify them most of the time; respond to thetext based on the content and personal experiences
Level 4 – The student will be able to:find the meaning of the words and expressions from the context; retrieve explicitinformation, select the relevant information and put it together according to a proposedstructure; identify certain secondary ideas; make accurate predictions when the informationis implicit and adjust them as needed; provide meaning for substitution words and manylinking words; interpret pictorial representations; reconstruct the chronological order of theevents of the story; make connections between the different parts of the text and relate theideas to situations in everyday life and other texts; make inferences and justify them with thetext while formulating opinions.
* At the beginning of Grade 4, students are expected to have attained Level 3.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
19
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 13
District 01 n= 586
District 03 n= 417
District 05 n= 374
District 09 n= 472
District 11 n= 370
Province n= 2219
Chart 14
District 01
Grade 4
Literacy
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4 by District, Including the Province
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
58 59 59 58
42
56
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
Des Bâtisseurs n= 101
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 22
Anna Malenfant n= 176
Saint‐Henri n= 77
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 19
Abbey‐Landry n= 43
Champlain n= 80
District 01 n= 586
Province n= 2219
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 68
20
56
58
65
44
53
58
66
27
57
50
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 15
Ernest‐Lang n= 14
Sainte‐Anne n= 17
Saint‐Joseph n= 17
n= 8
Régionale Saint‐
Basilen= 28
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 42
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 19
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerolle
District 03 Percentage of students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Grade 4
Literacy
60
66
62
76
75
75
53
64
53
52
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 47
Notre‐Dame n= 47
Grande‐Rivière n= 20
Mgr‐Lang n= 30
Marie‐Immaculée n= 26
Echo Jeunesse n= 22
Mgr‐Martin n= 35
District 03 n= 417
Province n= 2219
Régional de Saint‐
Andrén= 15
Élémentaire Sacré‐
Coeurn= 30
21
56
59
74
73
50
30
47
30
60
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 16
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié n= 57
n= 38
Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 7
Grade 4
Literacy
District 05
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveurn= 10
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 58
Carrefour‐Étudiant n= 35
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 17
La Croisée
Académie n= 13
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
68
76
54
71
47
47
60
45
80
49
M M l
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 38
Mgr‐Melanson n= 19
Versant‐Nord n= 20
n= 10
Arthur‐Pinet n= 11
District 05 n= 374
Province n= 2219
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 16
22
Apollo‐XI
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 25
Assomptionn= 13
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
56
59
81
55
50
72
70
68
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 17
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 16
Centre la fontaine n= 31
René‐Chouinard n= 17
L'Amitié n= 28
La Source n= 41
La Ruche n= 81
La Passerelle n= 24
L'Envolée n= 54
L'Étincelle n= 12
La‐Rivière n= 11
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 18
Grade 4
Literacy
64
75
48
50
63
59
46
54
76
29
25
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 28
Le Maillon n= 12
Ola‐léger n= 12
District 09 n= 472
Province n= 2219
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 13
23
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 33
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 41
56
58
75
54
83
73
75
70
64
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Le Maillon
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 18
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 32
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 26
Grande‐Digue n= 20
Donat‐Robichaud n= 36
n= 15
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
LeBlancn= 39
Grade 4
Literacy
District 11
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Anne
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Literacy Assessment at Grade 4
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 22
La Marée‐
Montanten= 34
46
44
54
42
60
20
38
25
35
41
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 13
Camille‐Vautour n= 19
Saint‐Paul* n= 3
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 8
Notre‐Dame n= 12
District 11 n= 370
Province n= 2219
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 36
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 15
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 40
24
56
42
50
40
42
63
42
46
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul*
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Sciences et technologies exam, by school, including the districts and province
25
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 19
District 01 n= 557
District 03 n= 453
District 05 n= 361
District 09 n= 475
District 11 n= 390
Province n= 2236
Chart 20
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam by School,
Including the Districts and Province
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
District 01
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
84
7378
72 7376
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
87Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Des Bâtisseurs n= 74
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 32
Anna‐Malenfant n= 196
Saint‐Henri n= 60
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 23
Abbey‐Landry n= 39
Champlain n= 95
District 01 n= 557
Province n= 2236
Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
26
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 38
76
84
79
77
96
80
88
84
81
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Champlain
Pourcentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 21
Ernest‐Lang n= 12
Sainte‐Anne n= 16
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
District 03
Carrefour de la
Jeunesse
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Centre d'apprentis‐
sage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 27
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 38
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 14
Régionale n= 24
68
59
57
75
57
94
75
59
87
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Joseph n= 14
Saint‐Jacques n= 41
Notre‐Dame n= 57
Grande‐Rivière n= 32
Mgr‐Lang n= 28
Marie‐Immaculée n= 25
Echo Jeunesse n= 27
Mgr‐Martin n= 43
District 03 n= 73
Province n= 76
27
Régional de
Saint‐Andrén= 17
Saint‐Basilen= 24
Élémentaire
Sacré‐Coeurn= 38
76
73
93
74
68
86
29
78
74
68
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 22
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 05
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveur
n= 70
Le Domaine‐
Étudiant
n= 6
Carrefour‐Étudiant
n= 58
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
n= 41
n= 1791
69
59
88
48
67
86
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 36
n= 4
n= 26
Mgr‐Melanson n= 11
n= 31
Le Coin‐des‐Amis n= 10
n= 6
N= 361
Province N= 2236
28
La Croisée
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 16
n= 18
Académie
Assomptionn= 11
Séjour‐Jeunesse *
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐
Dame
Apollo‐XI
Versant‐Nord
District 05
76
78
81
67
60
100
97
100
81
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 23
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 17
Centre la fontaine n= 43
René‐Chouinard n= 31
L'Amitié n= 24
La Source n= 44
La Ruche n= 51
La Passerelle n= 34
L'Envolée n= 35
É
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
District 09
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 16
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
83
81
62
71
80
63
61
70
65
'É ll
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
L'Étincelle n= 24
La‐Rivière n= 10
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 24
Ola‐léger n= 13
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 12
District 09 n= 475
Province n= 2236
29
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 33
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 48
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 16
76
72
100
69
81
81
75
70
40
71
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 24
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 45
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 24
Grande‐Digue n= 19
Donat‐Robichaud n= 31
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 21
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Sciences et technologies Exam
La Marée‐
Montanten= 30
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 18
86
73
74
95
56
71
67
83
100
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 11
n= 17
Saint‐Paul n= 10
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 10
Notre‐Dame n= 19
District n= 390
Province n= 2236
30
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
LeBlancn= 26
n= 19
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 32
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 58
Camille‐Vautour
76
73
31
63
74
90
70
59
82
86
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Mathématiques examby school, including the districts and province
31
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 25
District 01 n= 554
District 03 n= 452
District 05 n= 360
District 09 n= 468
District 11 n= 388
Province n= 2222
Chart 26
Percentage of Students Aaving Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including
the Province
Grade 5
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
83
74 74
65
74 74
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
79Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Des Bâtisseurs n= 72
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 31
Anna‐Malenfant n= 195
Saint‐Henri n= 60
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 23
Abbey‐Landry n= 39
Champlain n= 95
District 01 n= 554
Province n= 2222
32
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 39
74
83
76
69
96
82
88
74
86
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Champlain
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 27
Ernest‐Lang n= 12
Sainte‐Anne n= 15
Saint‐Joseph n= 12
Centre d'apprentis‐
sage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 27
Carrefour de la
Jeunesse
n= 14
Régionale Saint‐
Basilen= 24
Grade 5
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
n= 38
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerolle
76
74
69
67
79
64
73
75
52
84
Élémentaire Sacré Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 42
Notre‐Dame n= 57
Grande‐Rivière n= 32
Mgr‐Lang n= 29
Marie‐Immaculée n= 25
Echo Jeunesse n= 27
Mgr‐Martin n= 43
District 03 n= 452
Province n= 2222
33
Élémentaire Sacré‐
Coeurn= 38
Régional de Saint‐
Andrén= 17
74
74
95
85
72
76
65
59
76
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 28
n= 69
n= 35
n= 5
Le Domaine‐
Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveur
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
n= 39
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
n= 6
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐Étudiant
Grade 5
Mathématiques
District 05
n= 17
Séjour‐Jeunesse *
n= 11
n= 59
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
La Croisée
Académie 96
64
71
59
87
41
67
77
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 26
Mgr‐Melanson n= 12
n= 31
n= 10
Arthur‐Pinet n= 6
District 05 n= 360
Province n= 2222
Académie Notre‐
Dame
n= 11
n= 18
Apollo‐XI
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 16
Assomption
Versant‐Nord
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
34
74
74
81
67
100
83
90
100
96
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 29
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 17
Centre la fontaine n= 44
René‐Chouinard n= 31
L'Amitié n= 24
La Source n= 45
La Ruche n= 51
La Passerelle n= 33
L'Envolée n= 35
L'Étincelle n= 24
La‐Rivière n= 11
Grade 5
Mathématiques
District 09
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 15
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
71
74
73
39
65
69
50
68
80
59
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Ola‐léger n= 13
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 12
District 09 n= 468
Province n= 2222
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 32
35
n= 41
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 16
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 24
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoys
74
65
75
69
81
68
75
53
27
71
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L Étincelle
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 30
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 43
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 25
Donat‐Robichaud n= 30
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 19
Grande‐Digue n= 19
Mathématiques
5e année
District 11
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Anne
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 21
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 26
La Marée‐
Montanten= 30
82
84
69
73
95
58
60
70
83
100
Mont Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 11
Camille‐Vautour n= 17
Saint‐Paul n= 10
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 10
Notre‐Dame n= 19
District 11 n= 388
Province n= 2222
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 19
n= 32Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaud
36
LeBlancn= 26
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 57
74
74
38
74
74
90
90
65
82
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 5 Français exam by school, including the districts and province
37
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 31
District 01 n= 553
District 03 n= 453
District 05 n= 362
District 09 n= 469
District 11 n= 390
Province n= 2227
Chart 32
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
Grade 5
Français
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam by District, Including the
Province
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
76 74 73
62 6470
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
76Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Des Bâtisseurs n= 71
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 33
Anna‐Malenfant n= 196
Saint‐Henri n= 59
Sainte‐Bernadette n= 24
Abbey‐Landry n= 39
Champlain n= 94
District 01 n= 553
Province n= 2227
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 37
38
70
76
71
59
92
71
79
79
83
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Champlain
Abbey‐Landry
Sainte‐Bernadette
Saint‐Henri
Anna Malenfant
Arc‐en‐ciel
Des Bâtisseurs
Champlain
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 33
Ernest‐Lang n= 11
Sainte‐Anne n= 16
Saint‐Joseph n= 13
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 38
Centre d'apprentis‐
sage du Haut‐
Madawaska
n= 27
Grade 5
Français
District 03 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 14
Régionale Saint‐
Basilen= 24
63
74
73
69
92
71
69
100
63
68
Élémentaire Sacré Coeur
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Jacques n= 41
Notre‐Dame n= 58
Grande‐Rivière n= 31
Mgr‐Lang n= 30
Marie‐Immaculée n= 25
Echo Jeunesse n= 27
Mgr‐Martin n= 43
District 03 n= 453
Province n= 2227
Élémentaire Sacré‐
Coeurn= 38
Régional de Saint‐
Andrén= 17
39
70
74
91
67
56
70
88
87
63
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Mgr‐Martin
Echo Jeunesse
Marie‐Immaculée
Mgr‐Lang
Régional de Saint‐André
Grande‐Rivière
Élémentaire Sacré‐Coeur
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 34
n= 68
n= 36
n= 4
Académie n= 12
n= 18
Séjour‐Jeunesse*
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
District 05
Grade 5
Français
Carrefour‐Étudiant n= 42
François‐Xavier‐
Daigle
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
La Découverte‐de‐
Saint‐Sauveurn= 6
n= 57Le Domaine‐
Étudiant
La Croisée
92
67
72
56
81
61
67
66
Apollo‐XI
Académie Assomption
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
La Découverte‐de‐Saint‐Sauveur
Cité‐de‐l'Amitié
n= 25
Mgr‐Melanson n= 12
n= 31
n= 10
Arthur‐Pinet n= 6
District 05 n= 362
Province n= 2227
Apollo‐XI
Assomptionn= 12
40
Domaine‐des‐
Copains
Versant‐Nord
n= 17
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 18
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
70
73
88
33
90
100
77
100
92
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Le Coin‐des‐Amis
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Mgr‐Melanson
Apollo‐XI
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 35
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 17
Centre la fontaine n= 44
René‐Chouinard n= 31
L'Amitié n= 23
La Source n= 44
La Ruche n= 52
La Passerelle n= 33
L'Envolée n= 35
L'Étincelle n= 24
La‐Rivière n= 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 16
Grade 5
Français
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
71
63
75
42
54
70
57
52
55
47
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
La Ruche
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Ola‐léger n= 13
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 12
District 09 n= 469
Province n= 2227
n= 32
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 14
41
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandre
n= 23
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 45
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
70
62
92
69
71
71
83
63
45
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 36
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 43
W‐F‐Boisvert n= 25
Donat‐Robichaud n= 30
Number of students who
wrote the exam
n= 19
Grande‐Digue n= 19
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 26
Grade 5
Français
District 11
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Anne
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 5 Français Exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 21
La Marée‐
Montanten= 30
64
71
69
65
68
71
54
60
73
95
Mont Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
W‐F‐Boisvert
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 11
Camille‐Vautour n= 17
Saint‐Paul n= 10
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 10
Notre‐Dame n= 19
District 11 n= 388
Province n= 2222
42
n= 57
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 32
LeBlancn= 26
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeois
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 19
70
64
21
79
68
60
60
65
64
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Sciences et technologies exam by school, including the districts and province
43
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 37
District 01 n= 517
District 03 n= 416
District 05 n= 356
District 09 n= 454
District 11 n= 416
Province n= 2159
Chart 38
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam by District,
Including the Province
72
62
52
6155
61
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
78Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Sainte‐Anne n= 83
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 15
Le Mascaret n= 180
Abbey‐Landry n= 32
District 01 n= 517
Province n= 2159
Carrefour de
l'Acadien= 167
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 40
44
61
72
63
61
78
87
86
78
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Abbey‐Landry
Le Mascaret
Carrefour de l'Acadie
Arc‐en‐ciel
Sainte‐Anne
Champlain
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 39
Ernest‐Lang n= 7
Sainte‐Anne n= 22
Régionale Saint‐
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 38
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 19
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 13
n= 21
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
District 03
Number of students who
wrote the exam
40
71
46
50
71
100
79
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐Basile
Mgr‐Mathieu‐Mazerolle
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'apprentissage du Haut‐Madawaska
Carrefour de la Jeunesse
Saint‐Joseph n= 20
Saint‐Jacques n= 36
Notre‐Dame n= 49
Grande‐Rivière n= 19
Marie‐Gaétane n= 35
District 03 n= 416
Province n= 2159
Basile
A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 43
45
n= 21
Thomas‐Albert n= 94
61
62
66
79
47
51
63
50
40
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Marie‐Gaétane
A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grande‐Rivière
Thomas‐Albert
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 40
N= 73
N= 37
N= 6
N= 39Roland‐Pépin
District 05 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
Carrefour‐Étudiant N= 39
François‐Xavier‐
DaigleN= 16
Place‐des‐Jeunes
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Le Domaine‐
ÉtudiantN= 51
La Croisée
Séjour‐Jeunesse
83
38
69
44
37
68
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
Place‐des‐Jeunes
N= 35
Arthur‐Pinet N= 21
District 05 N= 356
N= 2159
Domaine‐des‐
CopainsN= 17
46
Province
Académie Notre‐
DameN= 22
Versant‐Nord
61
52
35
24
36
63
74
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Roland‐Pépin
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 41
n= 14
n= 24
n= 12
n= 23
n= 28
n= 54
n= 27
L'Envolée n= 56
É
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐
Saint‐Isidoren= 20
La Source
La Ruche
La Passerelle
L'Amitié
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Centre la fontaine
René‐Chouinard
50
56
80
68
52
25
42
57
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
Le Tremplin
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
L'Étincelle n= 24
La‐Rivière n= 6
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 32
Ola‐léger n= 21
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 14
District 09 n= 454
Province n= 2159
47
n= 24
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandre
n= 14
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 61
61
61
79
62
71
66
69
54
50
83
45
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 42
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 33
Secondaire Assompt n= 22
Grande‐Digue n= 23
Donat‐Robichaud n= 36
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Sciences et technologies Exam
La Marée‐
Montanten= 31
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 26
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 13
33
33
70
88
59
94
32
100
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 17
Saint‐Paul n= 11
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 13
Notre‐Dame n= 18
District 11 n= 416
Province n= 2159
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 34
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 16
48
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
LeBlancn= 33
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 70
Camille‐Vautour n= 20
61
55
18
56
39
69
91
40
59
56
33
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the provincial Grade 8 Mathématiques exam by school, including the districts and province
49
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 43
District 01 n= 515
District 03 n= 415
District 05 n= 363
District 09 n= 449
District 11 n= 412
Province n= 2154
Chart 44
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam by District, Including
the Province
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
7267
4653
47
58
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
54Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Sainte‐Anne n= 83
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 15
Le Mascaret n= 179
Abbey‐Landry n= 32
District 01 n= 515
Province n= 2154
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 39
Carrefour de
l'Acadie
50
n= 167
58
72
78
74
72
73
75
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Abbey‐Landry
Le Mascaret
Carrefour de l'Acadie
Arc‐en‐ciel
Sainte‐Anne
Champlain
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 45
Ernest‐Lang n= 7
Sainte‐Anne n= 22
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 38
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Régionale Saint‐
Basilen= 21
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 19
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 14
District 03
Number of students who
wrote the exam
39
45
86
43
36
43
95
82
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐…
Mgr‐Mathieu…
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'appren…
Carrefour de la …
Saint‐Joseph n= 20
Saint‐Jacques n= 36
Notre‐Dame n= 49
Thomas‐Albert n= 94
Grande‐Rivière n= 19
A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 41
Marie‐Gaétane n= 35
District 03 n= 415
Province n= 2154
51
58
67
77
76
68
67
73
39
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Marie‐Gaétane
A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grande‐Rivière
Thomas‐Albert
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 46
Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 74
Séjour‐Jeunesse n= 6
Roland‐Pépin n= 39
Versant‐Nord n= 36
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 54
Carrefour‐Étudiant n= 41
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 16
La Croisée n= 38
District 05
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
51
67
18
44
27
37
65
Roland‐Pépin
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
Place‐des‐Jeunes
Arthur‐Pinet n= 20
District 05 n= 363
Province n= 2154
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 17
Académie Notre‐
Damen= 22
52
58
46
41
20
68
64
51
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Roland‐Pépin
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 47
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 14
Centre la fontaine n= 21
René‐Chouinard n= 12
L'Amitié n= 23
La Source n= 28
Le Tremplin n= 53
La Passerelle n= 26
L'Envolée n= 57
L'Étincelle n= 24
La‐Rivière n= 7
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
District 09
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 20
71
51
45
38
64
68
52
33
48
50
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
Le Tremplin
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 32
Ola‐léger n= 21
Léandre‐LeGresley n= 14
District 09 n= 449
Province n= 2154
n= 14
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 59
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 24
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
53
58
53
86
62
36
53
56
29
29
71
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 48
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 33
Grande‐Digue n= 23
Donat‐Robichaud n= 35
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
La Marée‐
Montanten= 31
Secondaire
Assomptionn= 22
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 26
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 13
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐n= 33
40
45
31
65
31
55
91
23
92
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 17
Camille‐Vautour n= 20
Saint‐Paul n= 10
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 13
Notre‐Dame n= 18
District 11 n= 412
Province n= 2154
n= 14
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 34
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 70
Blanche‐Bourgeois
54
LeBlancn= 33
58
47
15
36
28
77
90
65
59
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Bourgeois
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable level or higher on the Grade 8 Français exam by school, including the districts and province
55
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 49
District 01 n= 511
District 03 n= 415
District 05 n= 359
District 09 n= 451
District 11 n= 411
Province n= 2147
Chart 50
Grade 8
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam by District, Including the
Province
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
7471 70
65 6369
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
target
68Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Sainte‐Anne n= 82
Arc‐en‐ciel n= 14
Le Mascaret n= 177
Abbey‐Landry n= 32
District 01 n= 511
Province n= 2147
56
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Samuel‐de‐
Champlainn= 41
Carrefour de
l'Acadien= 165
69
74
81
71
76
64
79
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 01
Abbey‐Landry
Le Mascaret
Carrefour de l'Acadie
Arc‐en‐ciel
Sainte‐Anne
p
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 51
Ernest‐Lang n= 7
Sainte‐Anne n= 22
Mgr‐Mathieu‐
Mazerollen= 14
Régionale Saint‐
Basile
Grade 8
Français
District 03
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour de la
Jeunessen= 38
Centre
d'apprentissage du
Haut‐Madawaska
n= 19
n= 21
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
65
65
86
71
59
57
95
71
Saint‐Jacques
Saint‐Joseph
Régionale Saint‐…
Mgr‐Mathieu…
Sainte‐Anne
Ernest‐Lang
Centre d'appren…
Carrefour de la …
Saint‐Joseph n= 20
Saint‐Jacques n= 37
Notre‐Dame n= 49
Thomas‐Albert n= 92
Grande‐Rivière n= 18
A.‐J.‐Savoie n= 43
Marie‐Gaétane n= 35
District 03 n= 415
Province n= 2147
57
69
71
69
81
61
59
86
65
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 03
Marie‐Gaétane
A.‐J.‐Savoie
Grande‐Rivière
Thomas‐Albert
Notre‐Dame
Saint‐Jacques
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 52
Place‐des‐Jeunes n= 74
n= 39
Séjour‐Jeunesse* n= 5
Roland‐Pépin n= 37
Versant‐Nord n= 36
Le Domaine‐
Étudiantn= 54
Carrefour‐Étudiant n= 39
François‐Xavier‐
Daiglen= 16
Académie Notre‐n= 21
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
District 05
La Croisée
Grade 8
Français
86
54
63
69
67
70
Roland‐Pépin
Séjour‐Jeunesse
La Croisée
François‐Xavier‐Daigle
Carrefour‐Étudiant
Le Domaine‐Étudiant
Place‐des‐Jeunes
Arthur‐Pinet n= 20
District 05 n= 359
Province n= 2147
58
Damen= 21
Domaine‐des‐
Copainsn= 18
69
70
89
45
57
86
86
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 05
Domaine‐des‐Copains
Arthur‐Pinet
Académie Notre‐Dame
Versant‐Nord
Roland‐Pépin
Percentages
target
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 53
La Villa‐des‐Amis n= 14
Centre la fontaine n= 22
René‐Chouinard n= 12
L'Amitié n= 23
La Source n= 28
Le Tremplin n= 54
La Passerelle n= 27
L'Envolée n= 57
L'Étincelle n= 24
La‐Rivière n= 7
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐
Isidoren= 20
District 09 Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 8
Français
67
74
50
56
72
75
57
42
36
43
L'Étincelle
L'Envolée
La Relève‐de‐Saint‐Isidore
La Passerelle
Le Tremplin
La Source
L'Amitié
René‐Chouinard
Centre la fontaine
La Villa‐des‐Amis
Terre‐des‐Jeunes n= 32
Ola‐léger n= 21
n= 14
District 09 n= 451
Province n= 2147
Soeur‐Saint‐
Alexandren= 22
Marguerite‐
Bourgeoysn= 60
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes n= 14
59
Léandre‐LeGresley
69
65
71
90
50
82
63
50
57
67
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 09
Léandre‐LeGresley
Ola‐léger
L'Escale‐des‐Jeunes
Marguerite‐Bourgeoys
Terre‐des‐Jeunes
Soeur‐Saint‐Alexandre
La‐Rivière
L'Étincelle
Percentages
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 54
Le Soleil‐Levant n= 33
Grande‐Digue n= 23
Donat‐Robichaud n= 36
n= 33
n= 31
Secondaire
Assomptionn= 22
Grade 8
Français
District 11
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Carrefour‐
Beausoleiln= 13
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level or Higher on the Grade 8 Français Exam
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐
Sainte‐Annen= 26
La Marée‐
Montante
70
64
67
57
65
55
88
45
92
Mgr‐François‐Bourgeois
Père‐Edgar‐T.‐LeBlanc
Donat‐Robichaud
Grande‐Digue
Régionale‐de‐Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Le Soleil‐Levant
La Marée‐Montante
Carrefour‐Beausoleil
Mont‐Carmel n= 17
Camille‐Vautour n= 20
Saint‐Paul * n= 11
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie n= 13
Notre‐Dame n= 18
District 11 n= 411
Province n= 2147
Dr.‐Marguerite‐
Michaudn= 32
Mgr‐François‐
Bourgeoisn= 67
Blanche‐Bourgeois n= 16
n= 33LeBlanc
60
69
63
47
63
39
69
82
50
65
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Dr.‐Marguerite‐Michaud
Blanche‐Bourgeois
Notre‐Dame
Calixte‐F.‐Savoie
Saint‐Paul *
Camille‐Vautour
Mont‐Carmel
Bourgeois
Percentages
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Elementary school results by sex, including the districts and province
61
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Reading comprehension
Chart 55
District Boys Girls
01 338 319
03 205 207
05 189 155
09 218 211
11 176 192
Province 1126 1084
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Silent Reading Test by Sex and by District, Including the Province
72 71 69 69 69 7076
80 7974
77 77
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Oral reading
Chart 56
District Boys Girls
01 338 319
03 204 207
05 188 155
09 217 211
11 176 192
Province 1123 1084
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Oral Reading Test by Sex and by District, Including the Province
Grade 2
Literacy
Number of students who
wrote the exam
62
7076 76
6865
71
81 8288
8480 83
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 57
District Boys Girls
01 299 287
03 209 225
05 170 163
09 202 207
11 177 197
Province 1057 1079
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 3 Mathématiques Exam by Sex and by District, Including
the Province
7267 68 71 68 70
7772
6874
6672
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Chart 58
District Boys Girls
01 226 313
03 181 215
05 172 176
09 261 198
11 184 186
Province 1024 1088
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 4
Literacy
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Level 3 or 4 on the Grade 4 Literacy Assessment by Sex and by District, Including the
Province
63
55
4651 48
40
48
60
70 67 70
45
62
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 59
District Boys Girls
01 277 286
03 241 217
05 183 187
09 237 244
11 201 193
Province 1139 1127
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Sciences & technologies Exam by Sex and by District,
Including the ProvinceNumber of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Sciences et
technologies
81
7380
7268
75
87
73 75 7378 78
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Chart 60
District Boys Girls
01 277 286
03 241 217
05 183 187
09 237 244
11 201 193
Province 1139 1127
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 5 Mathématiques Exam by Sex and by District, Including
the Province
64
Number of students who
wrote the examen
Grade 5
Mathématiques
7873 75
61
71 72
87
76 7469
76 77
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Chapter 2 ‐ Provincial Elementary School Examination Results
Chart 61
District Boys Girls
01 277 286
03 241 217
05 183 187
09 237 244
11 201 193
Province 1139 1127
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by District, Including the
ProvinceNumber of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 5
Français
6569
65
5358
62
8781 82
71 7179
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Chart 62
District Boys Girls
01 240 280
03 227 195
05 195 181
09 252 207
11 225 194
Province 1139 1057
Grade 8
Sciences et
technologies
Number of students who
wrote the examen
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Sciences & technologies Exam by Sex and by District,
Including the Province
65
72
57
47
62
5158
7367
58 60 5964
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Provincial Elementary School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 2
Chart 63
District Boys Girls
01 239 279
03 227 195
05 195 181
09 252 207
11 225 194
Province 1138 1056
Grade 8
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Mathématiques Exam by Sex and by District, Including
the Province
70
60
43
53
45
55
74 74
4953 51
61
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Chart 64
District Boys Girls
01 240 280
03 227 195
05 195 181
09 252 207
11 225 194
Province 1139 1057
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Acceptable Level on the Grade 8 Français Exam by Sex and by District, Including the
Province
66
Grade 8 Français
6158 58 56
5157
83 8375 74 75
78
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Percentages
Boys Girls
target
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chapter 3
Provincial High School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams and
Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.
The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2009-20101 school
67
Chapter 3
Provincial High School Examination Results
Provincial Evaluation Program at the High School Level
What is the purpose of these exams?
The provincial high school examinations areintended to provide provincial certification ofstudies done in Grade 11 Français andGrade 11 Mathématiques. Students enrolledin regular courses write one set of exams, andthose enrolled in modified courses writeanother.
The provincial exams also assess ESL OralProficiency in Grade 10.
What is the passing grade?
The final passing grade is 55% for Grade 11Français and Mathématiques. The final gradeconsists of 60% of the school mark and 40%of the provincial exam mark.
Grade 10 students’ ESL oral proficiency isreported using a five-level scale. The studentsreceive a certificate attesting to their level ofESL proficiency. Oral proficiency results donot affect Grade 10 ESL course marks.
The results reported in this chapter indicatethe situation for the entire 2009-20101 schoolyear by combining the results for bothsemesters, except in the case of Grade 11Français, which is a full-year course .
__________________1 January and June results are combined on the premise that the exams given in the two semesters are equivalent. The experts who help develop and correct the provincial examinations ensure that the exams given in the two semesters are as parallel as possible.
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 65Provincial exam enrolment rates by course and sex
Provincial exam enrolmentrates by course and sex
Chart 65 clearly shows that boys have atendency to enrol in modified courses. We alsosee that female enrolment rates areconsistently higher in all regular courses.
The gap is especially pronounced in themodified Grade 11 Français course, with boysaccounting for 54% of enrolments and girls for46%. The difference in enrolment rates showsgirls predominant in the following regularcourses: Grade 11 Français (by 8 percentagepoints) and Grade 11 Mathématiques (by 10percentage points)..
45%
54%
46%
55%
46%
54%
Mathématiques 11
Français 11 (mod.)
Français 11 (rég.)
68
55%
45%
45%
55%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Mathématiques 11 (mod.)
Mathématiques 11 (rég.)
Percentages
Boys Girls
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 66
Regular level
Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex - Regular Level
% of N.B. students enrolled in
regular courses
Grade 11 Mathématiques: 82%
Grade 11 Français: 89%
63
58
6360
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Ave
rag
e
Do the provincial exam results differ according to sex?
The provincial results (Charts 66 and 67)show that in the regular courses, girlsoutperformed boys in Mathématiques. Maleand female performance was significantlyequal in Français. In the modified courses,girls and boys obtained comparable results inFrançais, whereas the boys outperformed thegirls in Mathématiques.
This poor performance on the part of boys is asource of concern because it couldconsiderably affect their performance in othersubjects.
Chart 67
Modified level
Grade 11 Mathématiques: 18%
Provincial Exam Averages by Subject and Sex - Modified Level
Grade 11 Français: 11%
69
% of N.B. students enrolled in
modified courses 60 60
58 60
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Français 11 Mathématiques 11
Ave
rag
e
Boys Girls
40Français 11 Mathématiques 11
Boys Girls
The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 63% in Grade 11 Français and 59% in Grade 11 Mathématiques.
The provincial average (boys and girls combined) is 59% in Grade 11 Français and60% in Grade 11 Mathématiques .
N.B. .: Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 68
District Boys Girls
01 270 299
03 197 238
05 218 189
09 258 251
11 190 207
Province 1133 1184
Grade 10 English Second Language
Percentage of Students at Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by Sex and District, Including the
ProvinceNumber of students who
were interviewed
97
45
72
35
92
68
95
44
70
28
97
67
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
es
target
Chart 69
70
Percentage of Students at Each ESL Oral Proficiency Level , by Sex, for the Province
0 1 5
26
35
25
8
0 0 5
28 2830
9
0
10
20
30
40
Exempted Unratable Novice Basic Intermediate Advanced Superior
Per
cen
tag
es
Boys Girls
Boys Girls
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Difference between provincial exam average and school mark average
71
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Is there an appreciable difference between the exam marks and theschool marks?
Charts 70 to 81 show that there is often an appreciable difference between provincial exammarks and school marks. This difference is especially pronounced for the regular courses,with school marks being as much as 30 percentage points higher. For a district overall, thegap generally hovers around 8 percentage points. In the modified courses, the differencebetween provincial exam marks and school marks is smaller, hovering around 9 percentagepoints, although it may be as high as 20 percentage points, depending on the course andthe district.
72
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 70
Regular level
District 01 n= 435
District 03 n= 356
District 05 n= 125
District 09 n= 404
District 11 n= 287
Province n= 1607
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Français 11 Averages by District - Regular Level
Français 10331 and 10332 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks
The Français curricula are based on a communicative approach, whichexplains why the Français examination consists of two tests, a readingtest and a writing test, each worth 50%. The mark for the writing testincludes a “language” component (70%) and a “discourse andcommunication” component (30%).
71 74 76 73 70 73
64 62 61 6258
62
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
e
Chart 71
Modified level
District 01 n= 58
District 03 n= 54
District 05 n= 44
District 09 n= 54
District 11 n= 50
Province n= 260
73
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Français 11 averagesby District - Modified Level
N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
0District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
School mark Provincial exman
64 63 6559 60 62
57 55 57 55 53 56
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
e
School mark Provincial exman
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 72
Regular level
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10331
Grade 11
Français
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐10.6 percentage
points
-21,1
-18,3
-17,1
-16,6
-15,3
-12,0
-11,9
-11,6
-11,0
-10,8
-10,6
-10,3
-9,8
-8,4
-6,7
-6,6
-6,5
-6,1
-5,7
-5,5
-4,9
Secondaire Népisiguit**
Carrefour Beausoleil
Clément-Cormier
Thomas-Albert
Aux quatre vents
Louis-Mailloux
Cité-des-Jeunes
Sainte-Anne
W.-A.-Losier
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Secondaire Assomption
Province
Grande-Rivière
Roland-Pépin
Samuel-de-Champlain
L'Odyssée
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Marie-Esther
Marie-Gaétane
Mathieu-Martin
Centre La fontaine
A.-J.-Savoie
Chart 73
Regular level Difference, by District, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10331
74
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne*
Secondaire Népisiguit
Percentage points
-13,1
-12,4
-11,8
-10,7
-10,6
-7,4
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
District 05
District 11
District 03
District 09
Province
District 01
Percentage points
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** The results were not published for exceptional reasons.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 74
Modified level
Difference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Français 10332
Grade 11
Français
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐6.6 percentage
points
-13,2-11,0
-10,3-10,3
-8,9-8,4
-6,6-6,6-6,5
-5,6-5,5-5,4
-4,9-3,6
6,2
15 10 5 0 5 10
A.-J.-Savoie *Aux quatre vents *
Carrefour Beausoleil *Centre La fontaine *
Grande-Rivière *Marie-Gaétane *
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne *Samuel-de-Champlain **
Mgr-M.-F.-RichardThomas-AlbertLouis-MaillouxRoland-Pépin
Clément-CormierSecondaire Népisiguit
Sainte-AnneProvince
Mathieu-MartinW.-A.-Losier
L'OdysséeLouis-J.-Robichaud
Cité-des-JeunesSecondaire Assomption
Marie-Esther
Chart 75
Modified levelDifference, by School, between the School Provincial Exam
Average and School Mark Average in Français 10332
75
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Percentage points
-8,5
-7,7
-7,0
-6,6
-6,2
-3,9
-10 -5 0 5
District 05
District 03
District 11
Province
District 01
District 09
Percentage points
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.** This school had no students who wrote the modified-level exam
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 76
Regular level
District 01 n= 464
District 03 n= 355
District 05 n= 314
District 09 n= 360
District 11 n= 303
Province n= 1796
Mathématiques 11 Averagesby District - Regular Level
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam76 75 74 75 74 75
68
58 60 62 63 63
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
e
Mathématiques 30311 and 30312 averages by district -school marks and provincial exam marks
In Mathématiques, more than 80% of students write their exam in January, at the end of the first semester of Grade 11. Generally speaking, students display a satisfactory understanding of mathematical concepts and their decontextualized application. The main challenges lie with the problem-solving component, but students are increasingly demonstrating effective solving strategies.
Province n= 1796
Chart 77
Modified level
District 01 n= 62
District 03 n= 86
District 05 n= 90
District 09 n= 149
District 11 n= 62
Province n= 449
Mathématiques 11 Averages, by District, Modified Level
76
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
School mark Provincial exman
66 67 69 65 64 6659 61
5660 59 59
0
20
40
60
80
100
District 01 District 03 District 05 District 09 District 11 Province
Per
cen
tag
e
School mark Provincial exman
N.B. Differences in averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 78
Regular level
Difference, by School, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30311
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐12.4 percentage
points
-30,1
-21,7
-21,5
-21,1
-19,8
-19,7
-17,4
-15,4
-13,6
-13,2
-12,8
-12,4
-11,2
-10,4
-9,2
-8,7
-8,2
-7,7
-7,2
-7,2
-7,0
-6,4
-3,7
A.-J.-Savoie
Aux quatre vents
Centre La fontaine
Marie-Gaétane
Thomas-Albert
Marie-Esther
Clément-Cormier
Secondaire Assomption
Secondaire Népisiguit
Cité-des-Jeunes
L'Odyssée
Province
Louis-Mailloux
Sainte-Anne
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Grande-Rivière
Roland-Pépin
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Carrefour Beausoleil
Samuel-de-Champlain
W.-A.-Losier
Mathieu-Martin
Chart 79
Regular level
Difference, by District, between the Provincial Mark Average and the School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30311
77
30,
-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Percentage points
-17,3
-13,7
-12,7
-12,4
-11,5
-8,0
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
District 03
District 05
District 09
Province
District 11
District 01
Percentage points
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 80
Modified level
Difference, by School, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30312
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Province‐wide difference
between provincial exam
average and school mark
average: ‐7.8 percentage
points
-15,1
-14,9
-12,1
-11,7
-11,4
-11,3
-11,0
-9,8
-9,4
-8,7
-7,8
-6,4
-4,6
-2,7
-0,3
1,3
Marie-Gaétane *
A.-J.-Savoie *
Grande-Rivière *
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne *
Secondaire Assomption *
Samuel-de-Champlain *
Carrefour Beausoleil *
Roland-Pépin
Louis-Mailloux
Centre La fontaine
Marie-Esther
Aux quatre vents
Secondaire Népisiguit
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Sainte-Anne
Thomas-Albert
Mathieu-Martin
Province
Cité-des-Jeunes
Clément-Cormier
L'Odyssée
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
W.-A.-Losier
Chart 81
Modified level
78
Difference, by District, between the Provincial Exam Average and School Mark Average in Mathématiques 30312
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5
Marie-Gaétane *
Percentage points
-12,3
-7,8
-6,9
-6,9
-6,5
-6,4
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10
District 05
Province
District 01
District 09
District 03
District 11
Percentage points
* The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Performance indices for Français and Mathématiques by school, including the districts and province
79
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
What is the performance index?
The performance index gives the percentage of students in regular and modified courseswho earned a passing mark on the regular-level examinations. Since one objective of theeducation system is to prepare students for post-secondary studies, it is important that theybe able to pass the regular-level exams. This is an excellent indicator of their level ofpreparedness for post-secondary education.
Sample performance index calculation
Say that 75% of all students at school X are enrolled in the regular Mathématiques course.
Now say that 64% of the students who wrote the regular-level Mathématiques exam passed it .
The performance index is then calculated as follows:
(75 64)/100 = 48
Consequently, it can be said that 48% of all students at school X passed the regular-level Mathématiques exam. The performance index for school X is 48 for the Mathématiques
80
course.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 82Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Français
Grade 11
Français
51
52
58
61
46
63
69
59
61
74
62
58
61
Secondaire Népisiguit *
Roland-Pépin
Aux-Quatre-Vents
District 03
Cité-des-Jeunes
Thomas-Albert
Grande-Rivière
A.-J.-Savoie
Marie-Gaétane
District 01
Samuel-de-Champlain
Sainte-Anne
L'Odyssée
Mathieu-Martin
81
56
46
55
42
38
59
35
57
45
57
67
51
52
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Carrefour Beausoleil
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Secondaire Assomption
Rég. De Baie-Sainte-Anne**
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Clément-Cormier
District 09
La fontaine
W.-Arthur-Losier
Marie-Esther
Louis-Mailloux
District 05
Secondaire Népisiguit
Percentage points
target
* The results were not published for exceptional reasons.** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the results for the district and province.
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 83
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Performance Index by School for Grade 11 Mathématiques
42
38
35
37
38
36
50
21
46
61
81
70
53
60
Secondaire Népisiguit
Roland-Pépin
Aux-Quatre-Vents
District 03
Cité-des-Jeunes
Thomas-Albert
Grande-Rivière
A.-J.-Savoie
Marie-Gaétane
District 01
Samuel-de-Champlain
Sainte-Anne
L'Odyssée
Mathieu-Martin
82
46
48
75
54
50
46
52
40
43
39
36
42
52
40
42
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Carrefour Beausoleil
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Secondaire Assomption
Rég. De Baie-Sainte-Anne
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Clément-Cormier
District 09
Centre La fontaine
W.-Arthur-Losier
Marie-Esther
Louis-Mailloux
District 05
Secondaire Népisiguit
Percentage points
target
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Chart 84 District and Provincial Performance Indices for Grade 11 Français since 2006
Grade 11
Français
30
40
50
60
70
80
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Perform
ance indices
District 01 District 03 District 05
District 09 District 11 Province
Chart 85 District and Provincial Performance Indices for Grade 11 Mathématiques since 2006
Grade 11
Mathématiques
83
30
40
50
60
70
80
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Perform
ance indices
District 01 District 03 District 05
District 09 District 11 Province
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Percentage of students having achieved intermediate level or higher on the Grade 10 ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment, by school, including the districts and province
Second language oral proficiency scale
Novice Able to satisfy immediate needs using rehearsed phrases. No real autonomy of expression, flexibility, or spontaneity. Can ask questions or make statements with reasonable accuracy but only with memorized phrases. Vocabulary is very limited.
Basic Able to create with the language by combining and recombining learned elements. Can satisfy minimum courtesy requirements and maintain very simple face-to-face interaction with native speakers accustomed to dealing with second language learners. Almost every utterance contains fractured syntax and grammatical errors. Vocabulary is adequate to express most elementary needs.
Intermediate* Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in
84
Able to initiate and maintain routine conversations and satisfy predictable requirements in school/work settings. Able to provide autobiographical information in some detail and give explanations with some degree of accuracy, but language is awkward . Able to state facts and narrate, describe, report on and speak of current, past, and future activities. Can give directions from one place to another; can give accurate instructions in a field of personal expertise. Has a speaking vocabulary to converse simply, with some paraphrasing. Accent, though often quite faulty, is intelligible. Uses high-frequency language structures accurately, but does not have a thorough or confident control of grammar. In certain situations, diction would probably distract a native speaker.
* Intermediate is the level expected of students at the end of Grade 10.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
AdvancedAble to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy and vocabulary to participate effectively in most formal and in all informal conversations, on practical, social, and academic or work-related topics. Control of grammar is good and speech is fluent. Can describe in detail and narrate accurately. Can discuss abstract topics and ideas as well as events. Can support opinions and hypothesize. Accent may be obvious but never interferes with understanding. Sporadic errors still occur, but they would not distract a native speaker or interfere with communication.
SuperiorAble to use the language fluently and accurately on all levels normally pertinent to personal situation (academic, social, work-related).Can understand and participate in any conversation with a high degree of fluency and precision of vocabulary.Accent is good, but the speaker would not necessarily be taken for a native speaker.
85
Provincial High School Examination Results ‐ Chapter 3
Chart 86
Sainte‐Anne n=108
L'Odyssée n=177
Mathieu‐Martin n=235
District 01 n=569
Cité‐des‐Jeunes n=239
Thomas‐Albert n=91
Grande‐Rivière n=23
A.‐J.‐Savoie n=50
Marie‐Gaétane n=32
District 03 n=435
Percentage of Students Having Achieved Intermediate Level or Higher on ESL Proficiency Assessment , at Grade 10, by School
Number of students
interviewed:
Samuel‐de‐
Champlain
Grade 10 English
Second Language
n=49
65
74
44
19
68
48
64
35
96
97
94
95
96
Roland-Pépin
Secondaire Népisiguit
District 03
Marie-Gaétane
A.-J.-Savoie
Grande-Rivière
Thomas-Albert
Cité-des-Jeunes
District 01
Mathieu-Martin
L'Odyssée
Sainte-Anne
Samuel-de-Champlain
Secondaire Népisigu n=246
Aux quatre vents n=72
District 05 n=407
Centre La Fontaine n=37
W.‐A.‐Losier n=182
Marie‐Esther n=150
Louis‐Mailloux n=140
District 09 n=509
Carrefour Beausoleil n=12
Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard n=83
Rég. de Baie‐Sainte‐An=22
Clément‐Cormier n=127
District 11 n=397
Province n=2317
86
Roland‐Pépin
Secondaire
Assomption
Louis‐J.‐Robichaud
n=89
n=29
n=124
67
94
93
95
100
93
96
83
31
24
23
35
78
71
68
0 20 40 60 80 100
Province
District 11
Clément-Cormier
Louis-J.-Robichaud
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne
Secondaire Assomption
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard
Carrefour Beausoleil
District 09
Louis-Mailloux
Marie-Esther
W.-A.-Losier
Centre La Fontaine
District 05
Aux quatre vents
p
Percentages
target
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006
87
Percentage of students having achieved a provincial exam result of 55% or more (acceptable level) or 70% (competent level) by subject and school, including the districts and province, since 2006
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 87
2006 2007 2008
School 164 173 173
District 398 404 451
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 188 191
District 414 444
Province 1961 1639
District 01 École Mathieu‐Martin
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 01 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 88
2006 2007 2008
School 147 183 186
District 360 403 464
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 189 204
District 430 464
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
88
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 01 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 89
2006 2007 2008
School 144 151 147
District 398 404 451
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 137 137
District 414 444
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 01 École L'Odyssée
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 01 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 90
2006 2007 2008
School 121 137 160
District 360 403 464
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 137 146
District 430 464
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
89
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 01 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 91
2006 2007 2008
School 57 59 97
District 398 404 451
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 58 84
District 414 444
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 01 École Sainte‐Anne
Grade 11
Français
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 01 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Niveau régulier
Chart 92
2006 2007 2008
School 57 60 87
District 360 403 464
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 68 84
District 430 464
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
90
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 01 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 93
2006 2007 2008
School 33 21 34
District 398 404 451
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 31 32
District 414 444
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 01 École Samuel‐de‐Champlain
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 01 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 94
2006 2007 2008
School 35 23 31
District 360 403 464
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 36 30
District 430 464
Province 1956 1803
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
91
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 01 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 01 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 95
2006 2007 2008
School 19 28 41
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 30 32
District 418 359
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03 École Marie‐Gaétane
Grade 11
Français
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 96
2006 2007 2008
School 21 22 38
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 37 31
District 426 357
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
92
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 97
2006 2007 2008
School 51 51 43
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 49 40
District 418 359
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 03 Polyvalente A.‐J.‐Savoie
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 98
2006 2007 2008
School 42 45 52
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 53 40
District 426 357
Province 1956 1803
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
Grade 11
Mathématiques
93
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 99
2006 2007 2008
School 14 26 24
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 17 15
District 418 359
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 03 École Grande‐Rivière
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 100
2006 2007 2008
School 13 31 24
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 16 13
District 426 357
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
94
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 101
2006 2007 2008
School 74 98 106
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 98 86
District 418 359
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
Polyvalente Thomas‐Albert
Grade 11
Français
District 03
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 102
2006 2007 2008
School 63 99 93
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 95 90
District 426 357
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
95
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 103
2006 2007 2008
School 252 230 241
District 410 433 455
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 224 186
District 418 359
Province 1961 1639
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 03 Cité‐des‐Jeunes A.‐M.‐Sormany
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 104
2006 2007 2008
School 233 220 246
District 372 417 453
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 225 183
District 426 357
Province 1956 1803
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
Grade 11
Mathématiques
96
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 03 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 03 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 105
2006 2007 2008
School 89 66 72
District 414 375 348
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 49 63
District 348 128
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 05 École Aux quatre vents
Grade 11
Français
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 05 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 05 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 106
2006 2007 2008
School 108 78 74
District 423 395 218
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 55 65
District 372 318
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
97
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 05 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 05 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 107
2006 2007 2008
School 91 72 93
District 414 375 348
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 85 65
District 348 128
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
District 05 Polyvalente Roland‐Pépin
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 05 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 05 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 108
2006 2007 2008
School 76 83 109
District 423 395 218
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 99 88
District 372 318
Province 1956 1803
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
98
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 05 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 05 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 109
2006 2007 2008
School 234 237 183
District 414 375 348
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 214 0
District 348 128
Province 1961 1639
District 05 École Secondaire Népisiguit *
Grade 11
Français
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 05 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 05 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 110
2006 2007 2008
School 239 234 35
District 423 395 218
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 218 165
District 372 318
Province 1956 1803
* The exam was optional in January 2008 because of an exceptional situation.
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
99
Grade 11
Mathématiques
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 05 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 05 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 111
2006 2007 2008
School 126 124 110
District 439 468 460
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 120 114
District 435 411
Province 1961 1639
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 09 Polyvalente Louis‐Mailloux
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 09 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 09 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 112
2006 2007 2008
School 109 111 117
District 389 415 408
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 108 118
District 374 361
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
100
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 09 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 09 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 113
2006 2007 2008
School 101 122 120
District 439 468 460
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 114 115
District 435 411
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 09 École Marie‐Esther
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 09 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 09 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 114
2006 2007 2008
School 75 102 111
District 389 415 408
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 110 91
District 374 361
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
101
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 09 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 09 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 115
2006 2007 2008
School 171 179 196
District 439 468 460
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 165 148
District 435 411
Province 1961 1639
District 09 Polyvalente W.‐Arthur‐Losier
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 09 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 09 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 116
2006 2007 2008
School 152 158 149
District 389 415 408
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 116 119
District 374 361
Province 1956 1803
Number of students who
wrote the exam
102
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
Grade 11
Mathématiques
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 09 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 09 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 117
2006 2007 2008
School 41 43 34
District 439 468 460
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 36 34
District 435 411
Province 1961 1639
District 09 Centre scolaire‐communautaire La Fontaine
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 09 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 09 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 118
2006 2007 2008
School 53 44 31
District 389 415 408
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 40 33
District 374 361
Province 1956 1803
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
103
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 09 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 09 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 119
2006 2007 2008
School 124 115 96
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 105 107
District 346 297
Province 1961 1639
Number of studens who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
District 11 École Clément‐Cormier
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 120
2006 2007 2008
School 138 117 99
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 112 109
District 354 303
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
104
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 121
2006 2007 2008
School 120 137 120
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 134 106
District 346 297
Province 1961 1639
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 11 École Louis‐J.‐Robichaud
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 122
2006 2007 2008
School 138 141 127
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 134 109
District 354 303
Province 1956 1803
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
Grade 11
Mathématiques
105
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 123
2006 2007 2008
School 13 9 12
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 9 5
District 346 297
Province 1961 1639
District 11 École Régionale de Baie‐Sainte‐Anne
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 124
2006 2007 2008
School 15 11 10
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 9 11
District 354 303
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
106
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 125
2006 2007 2008
School 17 21 23
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 23 16
District 346 297
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 11 École Secondaire Assomption
Grade 11
Français
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 126
2006 2007 2008
School 29 24 26
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 28 18
District 354 303
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
107
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Regular level
Chart 127
2006 2007 2008
School 65 57 51
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 65 55
District 346 297
Province 1961 1639
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Grade 11
Français
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
District 11 École Mgr‐M.‐F.‐Richard
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 128
2006 2007 2008
School 92 65 57
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 61 49
District 354 303
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
108
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Regular level
Chart 129
2006 2007 2008
School 11 8 10
District 350 347 312
Province 2011 2027 2026
2009 2010 2011
School 10 7
District 346 297
Province 1961 1639
District 11 École Carrefour Beausoleil
Grade 11
Français
Number of students who
wrote the exam
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Français 10331 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Regular level
Chart 130
2006 2007 2008
School 13 11 12
District 425 369 331
Province 1969 1999 1874
2009 2010 2011
School 10 7
District 354 303
Province 1956 1803
Grade 11
Mathématiques
Number of students who
wrote the exam
109
Percentage of students having achieved acceptable or competent level in Mathématiques 30311 since 2006
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Percentages
School (55% +) District 11 (55% +) Province (55% +)
School (70% +) District 11 (70% +) Province (70% +)
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
Tables by subject, level, and school at the high school level
110
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 18 191 83 70 64 75 67 95 61 20 178 87 70 65 76 68 94 64
L'Odyssée 2 137 81 71 64 73 68 93 58 6 136 89 66 60 67 64 86 58
Sainte-Anne 1 84 92 74 62 68 69 98 62 3 57 93 78 63 72 72 97 67
Samuel-de-Champlain 1 32 97 72 64 78 69 97 74 1 31 94 71 66 84 69 94 79
District 01 22 444 85 71 64 73 68 95 61 30 402 89 70 63 73 67 92 63
Marie-Gaétane 3 32 89 69 65 69 68 88 59 2 30 100 75 64 73 70 100 69
A.-J.-Savoie 1 40 98 68 63 73 66 85 69 0 49 92 75 65 78 71 94 72
Grande-Rivière 0 15 94 69 59 67 65 87 63 0 17 85 64 54 35 60 77 30
Thomas-Albert 3 86 83 74 57 56 68 91 46 3 97 88 75 55 50 67 94 44
Cité-des-Jeunes 7 186 85 76 64 73 71 97 61 11 222 92 76 62 73 71 97 66
District 03 14 359 87 74 62 68 69 93 58 16 415 91 75 61 67 69 96 60
Aux quatre vents 2 63 85 77 61 62 71 98 52 0 49 79 78 60 61 71 98 48
Roland-Pépin 7 65 88 70 61 63 67 87 51 4 85 88 75 64 75 71 94 66
Secondaire Népisiguit ** 0 - - 77 - - - - - 8 214 89 71 62 71 67 91 62
Final Mark*
% Pass Final Mark
Perfor-mance Index
No. of Absentees
% of Students in This Level
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
No. of Attendees
No. of Absentees
No. of Attendees
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
% PassFinal Mark
Perfor-mance Index
% of Students in This Level
SchoolMark
Prov. Exam Mark
Français Grade 11 (regular level)2009-2010
Français Grade 11 (regular level)2008-2009
District 05 9 128 69 76 61 63 72 96 52 12 348 87 73 62 70 69 93 61
Louis-Mailloux 5 114 81 76 61 65 71 97 51 4 117 87 74 60 62 68 98 52
Marie-Esther 7 115 89 70 65 77 68 96 67 6 110 87 70 64 76 68 94 65
W.-A.-Losier 4 148 85 74 62 68 69 89 57 8 162 91 69 60 65 65 84 56
Centre La Fontaine 1 34 87 63 58 56 61 77 45 0 36 92 69 60 61 66 86 56
District 09 17 411 85 73 62 69 69 92 57 18 425 89 71 61 67 67 90 57
Clément-Cormier 9 107 86 71 54 42 65 89 35 8 105 87 70 55 45 64 81 39
Louis-J.-Robichaud 1 106 80 69 62 75 66 95 59 2 134 89 69 62 72 66 92 64
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 0 6 86 79 62 67 72 100 57 0 9 100 74 62 67 69 100 55
Secondaire Assomption 1 16 73 70 60 56 66 94 38 0 22 88 67 54 36 61 77 32
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 55 95 66 56 45 62 73 42 3 64 97 71 57 58 65 94 48
Carrefour Beausoleil 0 7 64 83 62 86 74 100 55 1 9 100 80 65 89 74 100 89
District 11 11 297 84 70 58 57 65 89 46 14 343 90 70 58 59 65 89 51
Province 73 1639 84 73 62 67 69 93 56 90 1933 89 72 61 67 68 92 59
* Passing grade: 55 %** Results were not published for exceptional reasons.
111
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
SchoolsMathieu-Martin 2 39 17 64 57 46 62 92 7 27 13 63 54 41 59 85
L'Odyssée 1 32 19 65 59 41 63 94 4 17 11 63 56 59 60 95
Sainte-Anne 1 7 8 58 52 43 56 71 0 4 - - - - - -
Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 2 - - - - - -
District 01 4 79 15 64 57 43 62 91 11 50 11 63 55 46 60 89
Marie-Gaétane ** 1 4 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - - -
A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 4 - - - - - -
Grande-Rivière ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 3 - - - - - -
Thomas-Albert 1 17 17 63 52 29 58 88 0 13 12 63 53 39 59 100
Cité-des-Jeunes 1 32 15 62 58 69 61 97 0 20 8 64 58 65 62 95
District 03 3 55 13 63 55 53 60 91 0 40 9 62 57 58 60 95
Aux quatre vents 0 11 15 62 59 27 61 82 0 13 21 68 55 46 63 92
Roland-Pépin 4 9 12 67 58 67 64 100 0 12 12 61 62 83 62 100
Secondaire Népisiguit 2 37 17 66 57 59 63 97 2 27 11 62 58 59 60 93
% Pass Final Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
% of Students in This Level
No. of Attendees
Final Mark*
School Mark
No. of Absentees
No. of Attendees
% of Students in This Level
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
% Pass Final Mark
No. of Absentees
Français Grade 11 (modified level)2008-2009
Français Grade 11 (modified level)2009-2010
District 05 6 57 31 65 57 54 63 95 2 52 13 63 58 62 61 94
Louis-Mailloux 4 26 19 65 57 38 64 96 6 18 13 68 60 72 65 100
Marie-Esther 1 14 11 55 61 64 57 67 2 16 13 53 59 63 55 69
W.-A.-Losier 2 26 15 57 52 27 55 56 5 17 9 56 54 47 54 65
Centre La Fontaine ** 0 5 - - - - - - 0 3 - - - - - -
District 09 7 71 15 59 55 39 59 72 13 54 11 60 57 59 58 79
Clément-Cormier 3 17 14 60 52 12 59 84 1 16 13 59 50 31 56 75
Louis-J.-Robichaud 0 27 20 59 53 41 57 85 1 16 11 60 55 56 58 88
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 1 - - - - - - 2 0 - - ‐ - - -
Secondaire Assomption ** 0 6 - 61 58 67 60 83 0 3 - - - - - -
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard ** 0 3 - - - - - - 11 2 - - - - - -
Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 4 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - - -
District 11 3 58 16 60 53 34 58 83 15 37 10 60 53 49 58 86
Province 23 320 16 62 56 44 60 86 41 233 11 61 56 55 59 88
* Passing grade: 55 %
112
** The results for schools with five enrolments or less are not published but are included in the restuls for the district and province.
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 3 204 84 72 68 74 71 91 60 5 189 83 75 72 86 74 97 71
L'Odyssée 6 146 89 76 64 60 71 95 53 3 137 93 77 63 64 72 93 59
Sainte-Anne 2 84 93 80 70 77 76 99 70 1 68 97 80 72 81 77 99 78
Samuel-de-Champlain 1 30 97 83 76 83 80 100 81 0 36 88 80 71 75 78 94 66
District 01 12 464 88 76 68 70 73 94 61 9 430 88 77 69 77 74 96 68
Marie-Gaétane 0 31 91 78 57 52 69 90 46 0 37 88 78 56 54 69 92 48
A.-J.-Savoie 1 40 93 77 48 23 66 95 21 0 53 96 78 62 74 72 96 71
Grande-Rivière 0 13 81 70 61 62 66 92 50 1 16 80 68 59 56 65 94 43
Thomas-Albert 2 90 86 75 56 43 67 92 36 0 95 82 75 61 56 69 95 45
Cité-des-Jeunes 8 183 74 74 62 53 70 86 38 6 225 83 75 60 54 69 88 45
District 03 11 357 80 75 58 47 69 89 37 7 426 84 75 60 57 69 91 48
Aux quatre vents 6 65 80 78 59 45 71 93 35 1 55 71 81 63 69 75 98 48
Roland-Pépin 5 88 79 67 59 49 64 81 38 4 99 80 68 62 64 66 77 51
Secondaire Népisiguit ** 4 165 76 75 62 56 70 95 42 5 218 82 78 60 60 72 94 47
% PassFinal Mark
Perfor-mance Index
No. of Attendees
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
% of Students in This Level
No. of Absentees
No. of Attendees
% of Students in This Level
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% Pass Exam
Perfor-mance Index
Mathématiques Grade 11 (regular level)2009-2010
Mathématiques Grade 11 (regular level)2008-2009
No. of Absentees
Final Mark*
Final Mark*
% Pass Final Mark
District 05 15 318 78 74 60 52 69 90 40 10 372 79 76 61 62 71 90 49
Louis-Mailloux 3 118 72 76 65 74 72 93 52 7 108 81 73 62 64 70 92 50
Marie-Esther 5 91 76 78 59 55 71 93 42 2 110 74 74 55 46 68 87 33
W.-A.-Losier 8 119 62 70 64 62 68 91 36 4 116 63 71 57 63 66 83 39
Centre La Fontaine 1 33 80 78 56 48 69 97 39 0 40 89 75 57 50 70 85 44
District 09 17 361 70 75 62 63 70 93 43 13 374 73 73 58 57 68 87 40
Clément-Cormier 9 109 89 74 58 47 68 91 40 3 112 89 73 65 68 70 89 60
Louis-J.-Robichaud 4 109 77 75 68 69 72 95 52 4 134 88 78 74 84 76 96 73
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 1 10 83 73 63 60 69 100 46 1 9 90 75 65 78 72 89 71
Secondaire Assomption 0 18 95 75 60 56 69 78 50 0 28 93 74 63 79 71 100 73
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 2 49 80 72 64 67 69 96 54 0 61 80 75 61 66 70 84 51
Carrefour Beausoleil 0 7 88 82 75 86 79 100 75 0 10 100 80 75 90 78 100 90
District 11 16 302 83 74 63 60 70 93 48 8 354 88 75 68 75 73 92 65
Province 71 1802 80 75 63 59 70 92 46 47 1956 82 75 63 66 71 91 53
* Passing grade: 55 %
113
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
SchoolsMathieu-Martin 6 40 16 68 60 60 65 86 2 38 17 70 59 66 67 87
L'Odyssée 0 18 11 61 59 56 60 83 0 11 7 60 61 82 60 73
Sainte-Anne ** 1 6 7 65 55 67 61 100 1 2 - - - - - -
Samuel-de-Champlain ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - -
District 01 7 65 12 66 59 60 63 87 3 56 12 68 59 68 65 86
Marie-Gaétane ** 1 3 - - - - - - 0 5 - - - - - -
A.-J.-Savoie ** 0 3 - - - - - - 0 2 - - - - - -
Grande-Rivière ** 0 3 - - - - - - 1 4 - - - - - -
Thomas-Albert 3 15 14 71 60 53 67 100 3 21 18 59 55 48 58 81
Cité-des-Jeunes 6 63 26 67 62 73 65 94 0 47 17 62 60 64 61 81
District 03 10 87 20 67 61 68 65 94 4 79 16 61 59 61 60 82
Aux quatre vents 0 16 20 65 55 38 61 81 1 23 29 72 63 74 69 96
Roland-Pépin 1 23 21 73 57 57 67 92 0 25 20 66 51 44 62 68
Secondaire Népisiguit 1 53 24 68 57 53 64 91 7 48 18 69 55 54 65 83
Final Mark*
% Pass Final Mark
No. of Absentees
% Pass Exam
No. of Absentees
No. of Attendees
% of Students in This Level
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
% PassFinal Mark
School Mark
Prov. Exam Mark
No. of Attendees
% of Studentsin This Level
% Pass Exam
Final Mark*
Mathématiques Grade 11 (modified level)2008-2009
Mathématiques Grade 11 (modified level)2009-2010
District 05 2 92 22 69 56 51 64 89 8 96 21 69 56 56 65 82
Louis-Mailloux 3 47 28 75 61 70 70 98 6 25 19 72 52 28 65 89
Marie-Esther 2 29 24 69 57 69 64 86 5 38 26 70 54 40 65 92
W.-A.-Losier 11 72 38 58 62 69 61 81 4 68 37 63 57 57 61 83
Centre La Fontaine ** 0 8 20 65 53 38 60 88 0 5 - - - - - -
District 09 16 156 30 65 60 68 64 88 15 136 27 66 55 47 63 86
Clément-Cormier 1 14 11 61 57 50 60 86 1 14 11 68 71 93 69 100
Louis-J.-Robichaud 2 32 23 68 57 50 64 84 2 18 12 67 58 56 64 95
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne ** 0 2 - - - - - - 0 1 - - - - - -
Secondaire Assomption ** 1 1 - - - - - - 0 2 - - - - - -
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 0 12 20 61 60 83 61 100 2 15 20 62 53 47 59 87
Carrefour Beausoleil ** 0 1 - - - - - - 0 0 - - - - -
District 11 4 62 17 64 59 60 62 89 5 50 12 66 61 66 64 94
Province 39 462 20 66 59 62 64 89 35 417 18 66 57 57 63 86* Passing grade: 55 %
114
Chapter 3 ‐ Provincial High School Examination Results
Schools
Mathieu-Martin 14 248 0,0 0,9 0,0 2,1 20,4 55,3 21,3 8 227 0,4 0,0 0,0 1,8 35,7 48,5 13,7
L'Odyssée 5 178 0,0 0,0 0,6 5,6 13,6 60,5 19,8 2 182 0,0 0,5 1,6 0,0 15,9 55,5 26,4
Sainte-Anne 4 112 0,0 1,9 0,0 2,8 16,7 38,0 40,7 6 98 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,1 10,2 45,9 36,7
Samuel-de-Champlain 0 49 4,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,1 26,5 63,3 0 37 5,4 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,7 43,2 48,6
District 01 23 587 0,4 0,7 0,2 3,2 16,3 51,1 28,1 16 544 0,6 0,2 0,6 2,0 22,2 50,0 24,4
Marie-Gaétane 2 32 0,0 3,1 18,8 59,4 18,8 0,0 0,0 1 34 0,0 0,0 20,6 67,6 8,8 2,9 0,0
A.-J.-Savoie 1 51 0,0 0,0 0,0 32,0 64,0 4,0 0,0 1 49 4,1 0,0 26,5 53,1 16,3 0,0 0,0
Grande-Rivière 0 23 0,0 0,0 0,0 52,2 34,8 13,0 0,0 0 17 0,0 0,0 0,0 23,5 47,1 29,4 0,0
Thomas-Albert 4 92 0,0 0,0 2,2 34,1 44,0 18,7 1,1 10 109 0,0 0,0 0,0 27,5 49,5 19,3 3,7
Cité-des-Jeunes 14 248 0,4 0,0 11,3 53,1 25,1 9,6 0,4 4 273 0,0 1,1 13,6 53,1 22,0 10,3 0,0
District 03 21 446 0,2 0,2 8,0 47,1 33,6 10,3 0,5 16 482 0,4 0,6 11,8 47,3 27,6 11,4 0,8
Aux quatre vents 2 72 0,0 0,0 4,2 27,8 31,9 27,8 8,3 1 81 0,0 0,0 7,4 14,8 39,5 30,9 7,4
Roland-Pépin 3 91 1,1 0,0 0,0 33,7 48,3 14,6 2,2 5 96 0,0 1,0 6,3 28,1 46,9 15,6 2,1
Secondaire Népisiguit 12 252 0,0 0,8 3,3 22,0 46,7 24,4 2,8 10 227 0,0 0,9 4,0 22,0 41,9 27,3 4,0
District 05 17 415 0,2 0,5 2,7 25,6 44,5 22,9 3,7 16 404 0,0 0,7 5,2 22,0 42,6 25,2 4,2
Louis-Mailloux 9 148 0,0 0,0 13,6 62,1 19,3 5,0 0,0 3 149 0,7 0,7 17,4 48,3 26,8 6,0 0,0
Exempted UnratableNo. of
AbsenteesAdvanced SuperiorNovice BasicInter-
mediateNo. of
AttendeesNo. of
Absentees
ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) 2009-2010
BasicNoviceUnratableExempted SuperiorAdvancedInter-
mediate
ESL Oral Proficiency Assessment Grade 10 (all levels) 2008-2009
No. of Attendees
Marie-Esther 7 154 0,0 2,0 22,7 52,7 16,7 6,0 0,0 10 163 1,2 3,1 16,6 53,4 15,3 9,8 0,6
W.-A.-Losier 10 187 0,0 2,2 9,3 53,8 29,1 5,5 0,0 7 199 1,0 3,0 10,6 53,8 26,1 5,5 0,0
Centre La Fontaine 1 38 0,0 0,0 2,7 18,9 48,6 27,0 2,7 0 41 0,0 0,0 0,0 12,2 43,9 34,1 9,8
District 09 27 527 0,0 1,4 13,9 53,2 24,2 7,1 0,2 20 552 0,9 2,2 13,4 49,1 24,5 9,1 0,9
Clément-Cormier 10 130 0,8 0,0 0,0 6,3 55,9 34,6 2,4 3 125 0,0 0,0 0,8 7,2 51,2 40,0 0,8
Louis-J.-Robichaud 6 128 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,8 43,5 46,8 4,8 5 150 0,0 0,0 1,3 2,0 48,7 41,3 6,7
Rég. de Baie-Sainte-Anne 1 23 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 18,2 81,8 0,0 0 13 7,7 0,0 0,0 0,0 46,2 46,2 0,0
Secondaire Assomption 3 31 3,4 0,0 0,0 3,4 27,6 58,6 6,9 1 19 5,3 0,0 0,0 0,0 47,4 42,1 5,3
Mgr-M.-F.-Richard 5 86 0,0 0,0 0,0 3,6 48,2 44,6 3,6 1 58 3,4 0,0 0,0 8,6 48,3 39,7 0,0
Carrefour Beausoleil 0 12 0,0 0,0 0,0 16,7 25,0 33,3 25,0 0 13 0,0 0,0 0,0 15,4 23,1 46,2 15,4
District 11 25 410 0,5 0,0 0,0 5,0 45,3 44,8 4,3 10 378 1,1 0,0 0,8 5,0 48,4 41,0 3,7
0 0
Province 113 2385 0,3 0,6 5,1 26,7 31,2 27,8 8,4 78 2360 0,6 0,8 6,7 26,2 31,5 26,9 7,3
115
Provincial High School Examination Results‐ Chapter 3
116
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
Chapter 4
Results of Pan-Canadian and International Assessments
Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs
What are SAIP and PCAP?1
The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education Canada
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?
Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories through CMEC developed SAIP
117
Chapter 4
Results of Pan-Canadian and International Assessments
Pan-Canadian (PCAP/SAIP) and International (PISA) Assessment Programs
What are SAIP and PCAP?1
The School Achievement Indicators Program(SAIP) was a cyclical program of pan-Canadian assessments of studentachievement in mathematics, reading andwriting, and science that was conducted bythe Council of Ministers of Education, Canada(CMEC) between 1993 and 2004. The Pan-Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) hassince then replaced SAIP. The first PCAPassessment took place in the spring of 2007.PCAP will continue to assess performance inthe same three core subjects as SAIP but willhave room for other subjects to be added asthe need arises.
_______________1 CMEC (2006). The Pan-Canadian AssessmentProgram (PCAP) and the School AchievementIndicators Program (SAIP). Taken on December 11,2006 from http://www.cmec.ca/pcap/indexe.stm .
Why did CMEC develop SAIP and PCAP?
Canadians have long been interested in howwell their education systems are meeting theneeds of students and society. To provideinformation on this issue, the provinces andterritories, through CMEC, developed SAIPand then PCAP to assess the performance ofstudents in mathematics, reading, andscience. Three cycles of pan-Canadianassessments have been conducted since1993. The information revealed in eachassessment, together with the reviewmechanisms of individual jurisdictions, hasgiven ministers of education a basis forexamining their curriculum and other aspectsof their school system.
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Why did CMEC replace SAIP with PCAP?
At its 83rd meeting (held on April 2, 2003, inLondon, Ontario), CMEC approved thedevelopment of PCAP to replace SAIP. Theneed for a new pan-Canadian program thatwould reflect changes made in jurisdictionalcurricula within the past decade had becomeapparent in Canadian provinces andterritories. PCAP also recognizes theincreased jurisdictional emphasis now placedon international assessments. It assessesperformance in reading, science, andmathematics, and will have room for othersubjects as the need arises. PCAP assesses13-year-old students and enables provincesand territories to improve their ownassessments and validate their resultsagainst national and international results.
What is PISA?2
The Program for International Student
The assessment covers three domains:reading, mathematics, and science. Althougheach assessment has questions from all threedomains, the focus shifts with eachassessment. In 2000 the focus was onreading, in 2003 on mathematics, and in 2006on science. In 2003, an assessment ofproblem-solving skills was also conducted.
In Canada, the first PISA assessment tookplace in April and May 2000 at the same timeas the Youth in Transition Survey (YITS) foryouth aged 15. The second assessment wasconducted in 2003.
Who participates in PISA?
Although the samples in most countries arebetween 4,000 and 10,000 students, inCanada, over 22,000 students are tested,which allows results to be produced at theprovincial level.
The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading
118
The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA) is an internationalassessment of the skills and knowledge of15-year-olds. The study is being directed bythe Organization for Economic Co-operationand Development (OECD) and involves over69 countries. As the study will be repeated inother years, it will continue to produce resultsthat can be compared internationally .
_______________2CMEC (2006). The Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA). Taken on December 11, 2006 fromhttp://www.cmec.ca/pisa/indexe.stm .
The survey includes a two-hour written test tomeasure students’ knowledge in reading,mathematics, and science, as well as variousquestionnaires to gather general informationabout the students and their schools.
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
How are students selected? (PISA)
About 1,000 schools across Canada arerandomly selected to participate in PISA andYITS. In these schools, a random selection ismade of 15-year-old students to determinewho will participate.
How is the information used? (PISA)
Because PISA is an international studyinvolving over 69 countries, it provides aunique examination of the levels ofachievement of 15-year-olds around theworld. It gives a clear indication of thepreparedness of these students as theycontinue in their studies and enter the workforce. It is able to address questions such as :
How well are young adults prepared tomeet the challenges of the future?
Results from PISA are invaluable toeducators, social policy analysts, and humanrights advocacy groups. These researchersand analysts have access to importantinformation that can be used in developingprograms to deal with both short-term andlong-term problems or barriers that youngadults may face in their pursuit of highereducation or in gaining work experience.Information from the survey helps to evaluatethe effectiveness of existing programs andpractices, to determine the most appropriateage at which to introduce new programs, andto better target programs to those most inneed .
Young adults themselves are able to see howtheir own experiences compare with those ofother young adults.
119
meet the challenges of the future?
Are they able to analyze, reasonand communicate their ideaseffectively?
Are some kinds of school policiesand practices more effective thanothers?
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PCAP 2007 domain
Reading as primary domain
Curricula across Canada identify comprehension, interpretation, and response andreflection as major organizing aspects of reading literacy. In this assessment, threesubdomains of the integrated process of reading are assessed: comprehension,interpretation, and response to the text (which includes response and reflection).
Comprehension
Students understand the explicit and implicit information provided by the text. In particular,they understand the vocabulary, parts, elements, and events of the text.
Interpretation
Students make meaning by analyzing and synthesizing the parts/elements/events todevelop a broader perspective and/or meaning for the text. They may identify thetheme/thesis and support that with references to details, events, symbols, patterns, and/ortext features.
Response to text
120
p
In responding, the readers engage with the text in a number of possible ways :
making personal connections between aspects of the text and their own real/vicariousprior experiences, knowledge, values and/or point of view;
responding emotionally to central ideas or aspects of the text; taking an evaluative stance about the quality or value of the text,
possibly in relation to other texts or social or cultural factors.
The curricula across Canada in reading generally distinguish between personal and criticalresponses.
Performance descriptors for scores at each level of the general scale
Level 1 scores (379 and below)The student demonstrates a partial understanding of some fiction and non-fiction texts. Thestudent understands directly stated information, relying on familiar vocabulary, concretedetails, and explicit statements. In interpreting texts, the student provides a simplified orgeneral perspective, often relying on directly stated conclusions or connecting someaspects of the text to one another. The student demonstrates understanding of how somecontent and text features are used to accomplish particular purposes. In respondingpersonally a.d critically to texts, the student’s responses are often vague or general
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
Level 2 scores (380 to 575)The student comprehends, interprets, and responds to a variety of texts in a clear andreasonable manner. The student understands both directly stated information andinformation implied by the text. The student connects general statements and supportingdetails, draws conclusions about the broader meaning and intent of the text, and interpretsspecific parts of the text based on inferences and figurative language. The studentdemonstrates knowledge of how texts are structured and organized to accomplish a varietyof purposes. The student’s personal and critical responses are supported with references tothe text and other sources.
Level 3 scores (576 and above)The student comprehends, interprets, and responds to a variety of texts in a thoughtful andelaborated manner. The student understands directly stated information and informationimplied by the text, including implications arising from subtle aspects of style and tone. Thestudent demonstrates insightful interpretation of the text by synthesizing several elements orby making a thoughtful analysis of one or more significant elements, often relying on subtlerelationships among elements and ideas. The student demonstrates knowledge and insightof how writers structure texts and use other elements of style to accomplish a variety ofpurposes. The student provides extended personal and critical responses, sometimesincluding social and cultural implications or literary evaluation.
Mathematics assessment
The mathematics component in PCAP 2007 is aligned with the jurisdictions’ own curriculaas well as the standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). The
121
The mathematics component in PCAP 2007 is aligned with the jurisdictions own curriculaas well as the standards of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Theoverriding principle of the assessment is that the application of mathematics is an integratedact in which the skills and concepts of various content areas are inherently linked.
Organization of the domain
For the purposes of PCAP, the domain of mathematics was divided into four subdomainsand three processes. The four subdomains are :
numbers and operations (percentages, equivalent representations, rates, ratio and proportionality);
geometry and measurement (properties of 2-D figures and 3-D shapes,relative position, transformations and measurement);
patterns and relationships (patterns and algebraic expressions, linear relations and equations);
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
data management and probability (data collection and analysis, experimental andtheoretical probability. The three processes are:
problem solving; communication and representation; reasoning connections.
The subdomains are traditional groupings of skills and knowledge, while the processes areused in the application of all subdomains. The PCAP 2007 mathematics componentincluded test items drawing from the specifications of all four subdomains and related to thecompetencies (processes) of problem solving, communication/representations, andreasoning/connections. In addition, an attempt was made to ensure that the contexts of thevarious scenarios were drawn from situations that were relevant, appropriate, and sensiblefor Canadian 13-year-olds.
The scope of this assessment was limited to those concepts and skills encountered andused by most 13-year-olds in their courses of study in Canada. However, it was not acomprehensive assessment of all the concepts and skills that a particular system expects13-year-olds to master.
Science assessment
The PCAP science assessment is founded on a definition of scientific literacy thatadvocates that students’ evolving competencies in using science-related attitudes, skills,and knowledge as well as an understanding of the nature of science enable them to conductinquiries, solve problems, and make evidence-based decisions about science-relatedissues Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy is the supposition that students have
122
issues. Embedded in this definition of scientific literacy is the supposition that students haveknowledge of the life sciences, physical sciences (chemistry and physics), and earth andspace sciences, as well as an understanding of the nature of science as a humanendeavour.
Like the mathematics assessment, the science assessment comprises items associatedwith the competencies and subdomains that provide opportunities for students todemonstrate their use of science-related attitudes, skills, and knowledge. Thecompetencies and the combination of the five interrelated subdomains as defined bycurricula across Canada, as well as the statements in the CMEC's Common Framework ofScience Learning Outcomes , provided the foundation for the development of test items.
Reporting scales for the minor domains
As was the case for reading, one mean scale score for each of the minor domains has beenused for reporting the achievement results. The pan-Canadian mean score was set at 500with a standard deviation of 100.
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by LanguageChart 131
PCAP (2007)Reading
476
477
478
479
486
486
491
492
503
505
524
532
Manitoba (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Ontario (F)
Quebec (A)
British Columbia (A)
Yukon (A)
Alberta (A)
Canada (A)
Ontario (A)
Alberta (F)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Ranking of jurisdictions on PCAP (2007) ReadingAssessment
123
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
436
458
459
464
466
471
471
473
476
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Manitoba (F)
New Brunswick (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
New Brunswick (A)
Nova Scotia (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
British Columbia (F)
Manitoba (A)
Scores
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Distribution (%) of Performance Levels in Reading by LanguageChart 132
PCAP (2007)Reading
17
17
17
16
16
15
14
14
13
12
11
11
10
9
72
67
65
72
70
72
77
58
71
70
73
55
67
54
11
16
18
12
14
13
9
28
16
18
16
34
23
37
New Brunswick (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Yukon (A)
Nova Scotia (A)
Quebec (A)
Manitoba (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
Alberta (F)
British Columbia (A)
Canada (A)
Alberta (A)
Canada (F)
Ontario (A)
Quebec (F)
Percentage of Students by Performance Level on PCAP
124
31
24
22
19
19
19
17
58
62
55
70
69
62
72
11
14
23
11
12
19
11
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Manitoba (F)
New Brunswick (F)
British Columbia (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
Ontario (F)
New Brunswick (A)
Level 1 (%) Level 2 (%) Level 3 (%)
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
PCAP (2007)Reading
Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Comprehension
Chart 133
480
480
482
483
483
489
492
493
499
503
524
531
Saskatchewan (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Nova Scotia (A)
Manitoba (A)
Quebec (A)
British Columbia (A)
Canada (A)
Alberta (A)
Ontario (A)
Alberta (F)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Ranking in Reading (comprehension) on PCAP (2007)Reading
125
445
466
472
473
475
477
479
479
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Manitoba (F)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
New Brunswick (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
New Brunswick (A)
Ontario (F)
Yukon (A)
British Columbia (F)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
PCAP (2007)Reading
Chart 134 Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Interpretation
477
482
482
483
486
489
491
492
503
509
525
532
Quebec (A)
Ontario (F)
Nova Scotia (F)
British Columbia (F)
British Columbia (A)
Yukon (A)
Alberta (A)
Canada (A)
Ontario (A)
Alberta (F)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Ranking in Reading (interpretation) on PCAP 2007
126
444
457
459
463
467
469
469
475
477
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Manitoba (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
New Brunswick (F)
New Brunswick (A)
Nova Scotia (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
Manitoba (A)
Quebec (A)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
PCAP (2007)Reading
Chart 135 Pan-Canadian Results in Reading by Subdomain and Language — Response to Text
476
480
482
484
489
493
494
495
499
506
516
522
Manitoba (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Quebec (A)
Ontario (F)
British Columbia (A)
Alberta (A)
Yukon (A)
Canada (A)
Alberta (F)
Ontario (A)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Ranking in Reading (response to text) on PCAP (2007)
127
445
458
462
467
469
470
470
471
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Manitoba (F)
Princ Edward Island (A)
New Brunswick (F)
New Brunswick (A)
British Columbia (F)
Nova Scotia (A)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Chart 136Pan-Canadian Results in Mathematics by Language
PCAP (2007)Mathematics
471
474
478
478
479
484
496
500
508
510
512
518
Ontario (F)
Manitoba (F)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
Alberta (F)
Manitoba (A)
British Columbia (A)
Canada (A)
Alberta (A)
Ontario (A)
Quebec (A)
Canada (F)
Quebec (F)
Ranking of Jurisdictions in Mathematics on PCAP (2007)
128
448
449
457
460
461
462
464
467
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Yukon (A)
Prince Edward Island (A)
Nova Scotia (A)
New Brunswick (F)
Saskatchewan (A)
New Brunswick (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
British Columbia (F)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence levels do not overlap.
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
Pan-Canadian Results in Science by Language
PCAP (2007)Science
Chart 137
479
480
485
485
488
496
499
503
512
514
516
524
Nova Scotia (A)
Saskatchewan (A)
Ontario (F)
Newfoundland and Labrador (A)
British Columbia (A)
Canada (A)
Ontario (A)
Nova Scotia (F)
Canada (F)
Alberta (F)
Quebec (F)
Alberta (A)
Ranking of Jurisdictions in Science on PCAP 2007
129
458
460
464
467
468
470
475
477
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Yukon (A)
New Brunswick (F)
Prince Edward Island (A)
Quebec (A)
New Brunswick (A)
Manitoba (F)
British Columbia (F)
Manitoba (A)
Scores
N.B. Averages are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province and country, for each PISA domain
130
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
PISA 2000Reading
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
Chart 138 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING
507
516
517
517
521
522
523
525
527
528
529
529
529
533
534
536
538
546
550
AustriaSweden
Newfoundland and Lab.Prince Edward Island
Nova ScotiaJapan
United KingdomKorea
IrelandAustralia
New ZealandSaskatchewan
ManitobaOntario
CANADAQuebec
British ColumbiaFinlandAlberta
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 reading assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
131
396
422
441
458
462
470
474
479
480
483
484
487
492
493
494
497
500
501
504
505
505
507
507
507
375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgLatvia
Russian FederationPortugalGreecePoland
HungaryLichtenstein
GemanyItaly
Czech RepublicSpain
SwitzerlandDenmark
OECD AverageNew BrunswickUnited States
FranceNorwayIceland
BelgiumAustria
Scores
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS
Chart 139
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
PISA 2000Mathematics
514
514
515
517
520
524
525
529
529
533
533
533
534
536
537
547
547
550
557
IcelandDenmark
AustriaFrance
BelgiumOntario
SaskatchewanUnited Kingdom
SwitzerlandCANADAManitobaAustralia
British ColumbiaFinland
New ZealandKorea
AlbertaQuebec
Japan
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 mathematics assessment
132
334
387
446
447
454
457
463
470
476
478
488
490
493
498
499
500
503
506
509
510
512
513
514
514
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgGreece
PortugalItaly
LatviaPolandSpain
Russian FederationHungary
GermanyUnited States
Czech RepublicNorway
OECD AverageIreland
New BrunswickNewfoundland and Lab.
SwedenPrince Edward Island
Nova ScotiaLichtenstein
Iceland
Scores
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
PISA 2000Science
Chart 140 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : SCIENCE
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
511
512
513
516
516
519
522
522
527
528
528
529
532
533
538
541
546
550
552
Czech RepublicSwedenIreland
Nova ScotiaNewfoundland and Lab.
AustriaSaskatchewan
OntarioManitobaAustralia
New ZealandCANADA
United KingdomBritish Columbia
FinlandQuebecAlbertaJapanKorea
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2000 science assessment
133
375
422
443
459
460
460
461
476
478
481
483
487
491
496
496
496
496
497
499
500
500
500
508
511
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilMexico
LuxembourgPortugal
LatviaRussian Federation
GreeceLichtenstein
ItalyDenmark
PolandGermany
SpainSwitzerland
BelgiumIceland
HungaryNew Brunswick
United StatesOECD Average
NorwayFrance
Prince Edward IslandCzech Republic
Scores
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Chart 141
PISA 2003Reading
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING
499500500503507510512513513514515520521522525525525528530534535543543
SwitzerlandOECD Average
NorwayNew Brunswick
BelgiumHong Kong-China
SaskatchewanNetherlandsNova Scotia
SwedenIreland
ManitobaNewfoundland and Lab.
New ZealandLichtenstein
AustraliaQuebec
CANADAOntario
KoreaBritish Columbia
AlbertaFinland
N.B. Differences in scores ares statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2003 reading assessment
134
375
382400403
412420
434441442
469472476478479481482489491491491492492495495496497498498499
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
TunisiaIndonesia
MexicoBrazil
Serbia and MontenegroThailandUruguay
TurkeyRussian Federation
SlovakiaGreece
ItalyPortugal
LuxembourgSpain
HungaryCzech Republic
LatviaAustria
GermanyIceland
DenmarkPrince Edward Island
United StatesFrancePoland
Macao-ChinaJapan
Switzerland
Scores
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
PISA 2003Mathematics
Chart 142
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100.
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS
515515516516517523524527527528529530532534536537538538542544549550
IcelandNova Scotia
Czech RepublicSaskatchewan
Newfoundland and Lab.New Zealand
AustraliaSwitzerland
Macao-ChinaManitobaBelgiumOntario
CANADAJapan
LichtensteinQuebec
NetherlandsBritish Columbia
KoreaFinlandAlberta
Hong Kong-China
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2003 mathematics assessment
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
135
356
359360
385417422423
437445
466466468
483483485490490493495498500500503503506509511512514
325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
BrazilTunisia
IndonesiaMexico
ThailandUruguay
TurkeySerbia and Montenegro
GreeceItaly
PortugalRussian Federation
United StatesLatviaSpain
HungaryPoland
LuxembourgNorway
SlovakiaOECD Average
Prince Edward IslandIreland
GermanyAustria
SwedenFrance
New BrunswickDenmark
Scores
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
PISA 2003Science
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE
Chart 143
505506506509511512513514515519520521523524525525525527
538539539
548548
Nova ScotiaSaskatchewan
SwedenBelgiumFrance
ManitobaSwitzerland
Newfoundland and Lab.Ontario
CANADAQuebec
New ZealandCzech Republic
NetherlandsMacao-China
AustraliaLichtenstein
British ColumbiaCorée
AlbertaHong Kong-China
JapanFinland
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2003 science assessment
136
385
390395
405429434436438
468475481483484486487489489489491491494495495498498502503505505
350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
TunisiaBrazil
IndonesiaMexico
ThailandTurkey
Serbia and MontenegroUruguayPortugal
DenmarkGreece
LuxembourgNorway
ItalySpain
Prince Edward IslandLatvia
Russian FederationAustria
United StatesOECD Average
IcelandSlovakia
New BrunswickPoland
GermanyHungary
IrelandNova Scotia
Scores
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
PISA 2006Reading
Chart 144 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING
508
510
513
514
516
517
521
522
527
528
534
535
536
547
556
Poland
Lichtenstein
Australia
Newfoundland and Labrador
Manitoba
Ireland
New Zealand
Quebec
Canada
British Columbia
Ontario
Alberta
China-Hong Kong
Finland
Korea
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 reading assessment
137
488
490
491
492
494
494
495
495
496
497
497
498
499
501
501
505
507
507
507
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
Austria
OECD Average
China-Macao
Slovenia
Denmark
United Kingdom
Germany
Chinese Taipei
Prince Edward Island
New Brunswick
Japan
Switzerland
Estonia
Belgium
Nova Scotia
Sweden
Saskatchewan
Netherlands
Scores
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
PISA 2006Reading
Chart 145 (continued)
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: READING (continued)
447
460
461
466
469
470
472
477
479
479
482
483
484
484
Turkey
Greece
Spain
Slovakia
Italy
Lithuania
Portugal
Croatia
Luxemburg
Latvia
Hungary
Czech Republic
Norway
Iceland
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 reading assessment
138
285
312
353
374
380
385
392
393
393
396
401
401
402
410
413
417
439
440
442
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzstan
Qatar
Azerbaijan
Argentina
Tunisia
Colombia
Montenegro
Indonesia
Brazil
Romania
Serbia
Jordan
Bulgaria
Mexico
Uruguay
Thailand
Israel
Russian Federation
Chile
Scores
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
PISA 2006Mathematics
Chart 146 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country : MATHEMATICS
522
523
523
525
525
526
527
530
530
531
540
547
547
548
549
New Zealand
Japan
British Columbia
Lichtenstein
China-Macao
Ontario
Canada
Switzerland
Alberta
Netherlands
Quebec
Korea
China-Hong Kong
Finland
Chinese Taipei
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 mathematics assessment
139
496
498
501
501
502
504
504
505
506
506
506
507
507
510
513
515
520
520
521
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
OECD Average
Prince Edward Island
Ireland
Sweden
Slovenia
Germany
Austria
Nova Scotia
New Brunswick
Iceland
Saskatchewan
Newfoundland and Labrador
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Australia
Belgium
Manitoba
Scores
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: MATHEMATICS (continued)
Chart 146 (continued)
PISA 2006Mathematics
462
466
467
474
476
476
480
486
486
490
490
491
492
495
495
Italy
Portugal
Croatia
United States
Russian Federation
Azerbaijan
Spain
Lithuania
Latvia
Norway
Luxemburg
Hongrie
Slovakia
United Kingdom
Poland
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 mathematics assessment
140
311
318
365
370
370
381
384
391
399
406
411
413
415
417
424
427
435
442
459
275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzistan
Qatar
Tunisia
Colombia
Brazil
Argentina
Jordan
Indonesia
Montenegro
Mexico
Chile
Bulgaria
Romania
Thailand
Turkey
Uruguay
Serbia
Israel
Greece
Scores
Chapter 4 ‐ Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments
Chart 147 Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE
PISA 2006Science
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100
522
523
525
526
527
530
531
531
531
532
534
537
539
542
550
563
Corée
Manitoba
Pays-Bas
Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador
Australie
Nouvelle-Zélande
Québec
Japon
Estonie
Taipei chinois
Canada
Ontario
Colombie-Britannique
Chine-Hong Kong
Alberta
Finlande
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant only if their confidence intervals do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 science assessment
141
495
496
498
500
503
504
506
508
509
510
511
511
512
513
515
516
517
519
520
522
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
France
Danemark
Pologne
Moyenne OCDE
Suède
Hongrie
Nouveau-Brunswick
Irlande
Île-du-Prince-Édouard
Belgique
Chine-Macao
Autriche
Suisse
République tchèque
Royaume-Uni
Allemagne
Saskatchewan
Slovénie
Nouvelle-Écosse
Liechtenstein
Scores
Results of Pan‐Canadian Internation Assessments ‐ Chapter 4
Average Scores and Confidence Intervals by Province and Country: SCIENCE (continued)
PISA 2006Science
Chart 147 (continued)
The average for OECD countries is 500 with a standard deviation of 100 454
473
474
475
479
486
487
488
488
488
489
490
491
493
Israël
Grèce
Portugal
Italie
Fédération de Russie
Luxembourg
Norvège
Espagne
Slovaquie
Lituanie
États-Unis
Lettonie
Islande
Croatie
N.B. Differences in scores are statistically significant if their confidence levels do not overlap.
Average scores and confidence intervals, by province andcountry, for the PISA 2006 science assessment
142
322
349
382
386
388
390
391
393
410
412
418
421
422
424
428
434
436
438
300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575
Kyrgyzstan
Qatar
Azerbaijan
Tunisia
Colombia
Brazil
Argentina
Indonesia
Mexico
Montenegro
Romania
Thailand
Jordan
Turkey
Uruguay
Bulgaria
Serbia
Chile
Scores
Conclusion
Conclusion
This marks the sixteenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.
The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2009-2010 school year. This year, an effort was made to reduce the size of the report while maintaining the level of information presented. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.
These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .
143
Conclusion
This marks the sixteenth year of publication of New Brunswick’s provincial examination results by school and district. The Department of Education releases these results to meet the requirements of accountability and transparency.
The production of this report is the outcome of a lengthy process of preparation and then compilation of the data gathered from the provincial examinations administered in the 2009-2010 school year. This year, an effort was made to reduce the size of the report while maintaining the level of information presented. The Department chose the most relevant data so as to produce a report accessible to everyone.
These results show all education partners and decision makers how New Brunswick students are doing in the subjects that make up the compulsory portion of the curriculum .
We would appreciate receiving your comments by mail or e-mail once you have read this report. Please send them to the addresses indicated at the beginning. The Department will examine your questionnaire responses and comments with great care.
Note, too, that school principals and district superintendents, as well as appropriate departmental staff, are available to answer any further questions you may have.
144