FYP Presentation

24
Can Hong Kong Port Remain her Competitiveness?

Transcript of FYP Presentation

Page 1: FYP Presentation

Can Hong Kong Port Remain her Competitiveness?

Page 2: FYP Presentation

Introduction• was once the pride of Hong Kong people • Hong Kong attracts the flow of cargo with

its free port status, • efficient and transparent customs

procedures, • high frequency of sailings, • multimodal transport system,

This report is find out the influences that affected Hong Kong container throughput in the past

explore reasons and give advices predict whether Hong Kong container terminals as

whole remain the competitiveness

Hong Kong container terminals

Page 3: FYP Presentation

Methodology

• Case study – Singapore

• Literature Review

• Authorities Documents (Internet)

• Combination

• Data analysis

• Updated source

Page 4: FYP Presentation
Page 5: FYP Presentation

Source : Data collected from various data sources

Page 6: FYP Presentation

Source : Data collected from various data sources

Page 7: FYP Presentation

Recent Trends Source : Summary Statistics on Port Traffic of Hong Kong

Page 8: FYP Presentation

Source : Summary Statistics on Port Traffic of Hong Kong

Page 9: FYP Presentation

Reasons for the decline of container throughput of Hong Kong

1. Economic transformation

2. New terminals construction of “ YanTian” and “SheKou’

3. Port Competitiveness - High total through cost

Page 10: FYP Presentation

1. Economic transformation

• Since the fast pace of development of the 1970s, • financial, trade and services industries have been

catching up. • The financial economy success also means that

the decline of the import and export trade of Hong Kong,

• the government pays less attention and invested less in this sector.

Page 11: FYP Presentation

Hong Kong Port - Kwai Tsing Container Terminals

These terminals are operated by five companies, namely:• Modern Terminals Ltd. (MTL)• Hongkong International Terminals Ltd. (HIT)• COSCO Information & Technology (H.K.) Ltd. (COSCO)• Dubai Port International Terminals Ltd. (DPI)• Asia Container Terminals Ltd. (ACT)

Page 12: FYP Presentation

• with limited destinations and low service frequency• But Shenzhen competed at the lower end offering the

lowest port charges in the region • Yantian Port has the highest charges on the Mainland• But offered a more competitive turnaround time and

better global network integration.

2. Challenge - Port of Shekou and Yantian , Shenzhen

Page 13: FYP Presentation

3. Port Competitiveness - High Total Through Costs • High road haulage tariffs • High Terminal Handling Charges (THCs).

• it costs US$280 more per FEU for East PRD cargo moved inland by road via HKP to US West

• However, barging via the West Shenzhen ports of Shekou and Chiwan still offers a US$160 cost advantage versus HKP, the reason is that Hong Kong’s THC is about US$100 more expensive.

FEU: Forty-foot equivalent unit (a 40 foot ISO container).

Page 14: FYP Presentation

Case Study – Port of Singapore

• Currently the world's second-busiest port in terms of total shipping tonnage• it also transships a fifth of the world's shipping containers• half of the world's annual supply of crude oil• and is the world's busiest transshipment port.

Page 15: FYP Presentation

Port of Hong Kong

Port of Singapore

Port comparison

Page 16: FYP Presentation

• As a trading port for ships plying their trade between Europe and East Asia.

• “With the competition and technology that came with containerization and building of faster ships with a more economical use of fuel oil, shipping lines are using larger ships over greater distances”.

Case Study – Port of Singapore

Page 17: FYP Presentation

City Government Policy Support

Hong Kong RTE, DTA, CDTA

Singapore CDTA, LT, EIA

China FTZ, VAT, SEZ

Double tax agreement countries covered:

Hong Kong – 51Singapore – 74China – 96

Source: Data collect from state administration of taxation (2014)

Government Support - Taxation

Page 18: FYP Presentation

Other factors – Labour Strikes

Page 19: FYP Presentation

Source : Analyzed by Lam and Zhang, 2011

Page 20: FYP Presentation

Conclusion

• Shenzhen’s market share of cargo in the region will be drastically increase

• Shenzhen has been predicted to become the world’s largest container

port

• Hong Kong port lost her competitiveness unless transformation of

maritime cluster

• Regards to well-integrated finance, legal and other service sectors

• Framework Agreement on Hong Kong/Guangdong Cooperation which may

help the development between Mainland China and Shenzhen port

Page 21: FYP Presentation

Recommendation• HKG provides additional land for containers and related uses

• Port expansion, future container terminal

• Strengthen collaboration PRD (e.g. CEPA)

• HKG vigorously promote HK as the largest Port-service centre in Asia:

e.g. provide more incentives to SMEs ;

build a maritime service centre ;

provide more tax concession for owner to boost the maritime

cluster

Page 22: FYP Presentation

Limitation

• Shortage of study time

• Technical support

• Data collection

• Lack of Diversification

• Experience

• Resource

Page 23: FYP Presentation

Q & A

Page 24: FYP Presentation