Post on 03-Oct-2020
AGINTZARI SOCIAL COOPERATIVE
LANDALAB Pilot model for cost-efficient, data-driven and community-empowered social intervention in rural areas.
EGEFaren (Eskualde Garapenerako Europako Funtsa) Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundiak, Gipuzkoa Etorkizuna Kolaboratzaile: Kolaboratzaileak:%50eko kofinantzaketa komunitarioa Eraikiz GipuzkoaLab programaren laguntzarekin. Villabonako Udala Zerain, Leintz-Gatzaga, Angiozar-Bergara
Angiozar
WHY LANDALAB-TEKNOADINEKO? BASQUE COUNTRY DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL REALITY
Rural Areas (OCDE – EUROSTAT Standards)
< 10.000 < 150 hab/km2
Population Municipalities Population Municipalities
N % N % N % N %
Gipuzkoa 165.080 23,0% 69 78,4% 52.319 7,3% 43 48,9%
Hego Euskal Herria 722.152 25,5% 471 90,1% 391.785 13,8% 398 76,1% Itu
rria
: Zah
artz
ep
rosp
ekti
ba,
Gip
uzk
oa
20
25
. Gai
nd
egia
/ G
FA (2
01
5)
01
02
03
04
05
EXTREME AGEINGThe Basque Country is one of the most aged societiesin the world. [<65] [2015 - 20,4% [2025 – 25,6%].
CONCENTRATION ON RURAL AREASMost of the Basque elderly population lives in rural andsometimes isolated areas. Projection +75 y.o. >30% (2025).
SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM IS URBANSocial protection system (Laws, Decrees, Portfolios) are focused on(and designed for) urban areas. Tacit dynamics not incorporated.
RURAL AREAS ARE NOT PROPERLY PROTECTEDTherefore, Social services are not reaching adequately rural areas.Not financing schemes. Even 3.000 inhabitant/area is too large.
NEED TO INNOVATE. SOCIAL CHALLENGEAs a consequence of the previous, there is an urgent need to innovate…As a social agent, there must be something we can do…
OVER-AGEING PROJECTION
[% <75 y.o – 2025]
DESIGNING THE MODEL. INSPIRATIONAL VECTORS
• Experiences: Catalunya, UK, Hungary,Finland + France, Sweden, Norway, USA,Canada, Australia.
• Shared Challenge across the world. No clearintegral models.
• Urgent need to innovate.
.
COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT
Innovation by Adoption/ Partial Adaptation
SOCIAL TECHNOLOGY
Basque Traditional Asset
New Diagnosis Possibilities
Need to design an specific integralmodel for Basque Society (tokian,tokiko) combining:
• Success models (coming frominternational experiences)
• New possibilities (coming fromsocial technology)
• Community Empowerment (basedon intangible/tacit knowledge).
INSPIRING MODELS / REFERENCES
WORKFLOW
QUANTITATIVE ANALAYSISGIS Geo-referred data
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS Social-Anthropological
SOCIAL DYNAMICSEmpowered-community
CAPACITY BUILDINGCommunity “Social Glasses” Training
EARLY DETECTION / SOCIAL INTERVENTIONCost-efficient and community-activated detection
GIS DATAANALYSIS
SOCIALDIAGNOSIS
CAPACITYBUILDING
SOCIALDYNAMICS
EARLYDETECTION
Icons: Credits. Flaticon.com
OUR MODEL
ANTENNAPOPULATION
COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES
DETECTION/ INTERVENTION
AGENTS ANALYSIS
SOCIAL SERVICES
SOME RESULTS AND INITIAL LEARNINGS
WORK IN PROGRESS. Testing the model in 4 local rural areas...
1. Zerain.2. Angiozar-Bergara.3. Leintz-Gatzaga.4. Amasa-Villabona.
WHAT WE KNOW UP TO NOW…
• Not a universal model. Does not work anywhere.
• Initial positive results (new technical/technological detectiontools, activated-community for early intervention, tacit to explicitknowledge transformation, cost-efficient project).
INCOMING DEVELOPMENTS…
• New employment possibilities (rural-area based).
• Maybe appropriate for post-industrial urban areas.
For further information please contact:
Eduardo DíazEuropean Affairs
eduardodiaz@agintzari.com
24
31